用机器学习方法预测Twitter上的情绪强度值

Q3 Computer Science CommIT Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.21512/commit.v17i2.8503
Rindy Claudia Setiawan, Andry Chowanda
{"title":"用机器学习方法预测Twitter上的情绪强度值","authors":"Rindy Claudia Setiawan, Andry Chowanda","doi":"10.21512/commit.v17i2.8503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recognizing the intensity of the emotions is a paramount task for an affective system. By recognizing the intensity of the emotions, the system can have better human-computer interaction. The research explores several machine learning approaches with several different feature extraction method combinations to solve the emotion intensity prediction task while also analyzing and comparing it with several previous related papers. The research uses the dataset provided through theWASSA 2017 and SemEval 2018 competition. The dataset utilizes four of the eight basic emotions that Plutchik defines (anger, fear, joy, and sadness). The total data result in 19,736 rows of entry, with a total of 10,715 (54.3%) for training, 1,811 (9.17%) for validation, and 7,210 (36.53%) for testing. Three feature extraction methods are used and compared: N-gram, TFIDF, and Bag-of-Words. Meanwhile, machine learning algorithms are Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, KNearest Neighbor for Regression, Regression Tree, and Support Vector Regression (SVR). The results show that SVR with TF-IDF features has the best result of all attempted experiments, with a Pearson correlation score of 0.755 for all data and 0.647 for gold labels data. The final model also accepts newly seen data and displays the corresponding emotion label and intensity.","PeriodicalId":31276,"journal":{"name":"CommIT Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotion Intensity Value Prediction with Machine Learning Approach on Twitter\",\"authors\":\"Rindy Claudia Setiawan, Andry Chowanda\",\"doi\":\"10.21512/commit.v17i2.8503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recognizing the intensity of the emotions is a paramount task for an affective system. By recognizing the intensity of the emotions, the system can have better human-computer interaction. The research explores several machine learning approaches with several different feature extraction method combinations to solve the emotion intensity prediction task while also analyzing and comparing it with several previous related papers. The research uses the dataset provided through theWASSA 2017 and SemEval 2018 competition. The dataset utilizes four of the eight basic emotions that Plutchik defines (anger, fear, joy, and sadness). The total data result in 19,736 rows of entry, with a total of 10,715 (54.3%) for training, 1,811 (9.17%) for validation, and 7,210 (36.53%) for testing. Three feature extraction methods are used and compared: N-gram, TFIDF, and Bag-of-Words. Meanwhile, machine learning algorithms are Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, KNearest Neighbor for Regression, Regression Tree, and Support Vector Regression (SVR). The results show that SVR with TF-IDF features has the best result of all attempted experiments, with a Pearson correlation score of 0.755 for all data and 0.647 for gold labels data. The final model also accepts newly seen data and displays the corresponding emotion label and intensity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CommIT Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CommIT Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v17i2.8503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CommIT Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v17i2.8503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

识别情绪的强度是情感系统的首要任务。通过识别情绪的强度,系统可以有更好的人机交互。本研究探索了几种机器学习方法和几种不同的特征提取方法组合来解决情绪强度预测任务,并与之前的几篇相关论文进行了分析和比较。该研究使用了2017年wassa和2018年SemEval竞赛提供的数据集。该数据集利用了Plutchik定义的八种基本情绪中的四种(愤怒、恐惧、喜悦和悲伤)。总共有19,736行数据,其中10,715行(54.3%)用于训练,1,811行(9.17%)用于验证,7,210行(36.53%)用于测试。对比了N-gram、TFIDF和Bag-of-Words三种特征提取方法。同时,机器学习算法有线性回归、岭回归、最近邻回归、回归树和支持向量回归(SVR)。结果表明,具有TF-IDF特征的SVR在所有尝试的实验中效果最好,所有数据的Pearson相关评分为0.755,金标数据的Pearson相关评分为0.647。最后的模型也接受新看到的数据,并显示相应的情绪标签和强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emotion Intensity Value Prediction with Machine Learning Approach on Twitter
Recognizing the intensity of the emotions is a paramount task for an affective system. By recognizing the intensity of the emotions, the system can have better human-computer interaction. The research explores several machine learning approaches with several different feature extraction method combinations to solve the emotion intensity prediction task while also analyzing and comparing it with several previous related papers. The research uses the dataset provided through theWASSA 2017 and SemEval 2018 competition. The dataset utilizes four of the eight basic emotions that Plutchik defines (anger, fear, joy, and sadness). The total data result in 19,736 rows of entry, with a total of 10,715 (54.3%) for training, 1,811 (9.17%) for validation, and 7,210 (36.53%) for testing. Three feature extraction methods are used and compared: N-gram, TFIDF, and Bag-of-Words. Meanwhile, machine learning algorithms are Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, KNearest Neighbor for Regression, Regression Tree, and Support Vector Regression (SVR). The results show that SVR with TF-IDF features has the best result of all attempted experiments, with a Pearson correlation score of 0.755 for all data and 0.647 for gold labels data. The final model also accepts newly seen data and displays the corresponding emotion label and intensity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CommIT Journal
CommIT Journal Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emotion Intensity Value Prediction with Machine Learning Approach on Twitter End-to-End Steering Angle Prediction for Autonomous Car Using Vision Transformer Web Server Load Balancing Mechanism with Least Connection Algorithm and Multi-Agent System Factors on Mobile Application User Satisfaction in the Largest Indonesian Internet Service Provider (ISP) Effect of Students’ Activities on Academic Performance Using Clustering Evolution Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1