绘制英格兰专业体育俱乐部提供的地方社区健康和福利方案的提供和评价做法:基于实践的目标审查

IF 2.1 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1080/19406940.2023.2271904
Jack Brazier, Charlie Foster, Nick Townsend, Joey Murphy, Matthew Northcote, Andy Smith
{"title":"绘制英格兰专业体育俱乐部提供的地方社区健康和福利方案的提供和评价做法:基于实践的目标审查","authors":"Jack Brazier, Charlie Foster, Nick Townsend, Joey Murphy, Matthew Northcote, Andy Smith","doi":"10.1080/19406940.2023.2271904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional sports clubs (PSCs) are potentially effective settings for health promotion; however, their role within policy is unclear. Potential reasons include lack of awareness about existing provision of health and wellbeing (H&W) programmes and adequacy of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) practices. This review aimed to: (i) map the provision of H&W programmes delivered by PSCs in the United Kingdom (UK), and (ii) explore current M&E practices of PSCs and consider the policy implications of this. Websites from eight professional sport leagues were hand-searched for programmes and impact reports. Suitable programmes were quantified, whilst impact reports were analysed via inductive documentary content analysis. Results identified 176 H&W programmes and 36 impact reports, as well as 43 H&W impact statements, but only 14 of these were aligned to specific H&W outcomes. The H&W aims of programmes were typically vague, measurement tools were rarely used, and evaluations were usually anecdotal case studies and based on engagement figures, which may not only limit the potential uptake of these programmes but also the relevance of PSCs to public policy. Further research is thus needed to build a stronger evidence base for the use of PSCs as vehicles of public health promotion and policy, and to better address the challenges faced when seeking to monitor and evaluate PSC programmes effectively.","PeriodicalId":47174,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics","volume":"13 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the provision and evaluation practices of local community health and wellbeing programmes delivered by professional sports clubs in England: a practice-based targeted review\",\"authors\":\"Jack Brazier, Charlie Foster, Nick Townsend, Joey Murphy, Matthew Northcote, Andy Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19406940.2023.2271904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professional sports clubs (PSCs) are potentially effective settings for health promotion; however, their role within policy is unclear. Potential reasons include lack of awareness about existing provision of health and wellbeing (H&W) programmes and adequacy of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) practices. This review aimed to: (i) map the provision of H&W programmes delivered by PSCs in the United Kingdom (UK), and (ii) explore current M&E practices of PSCs and consider the policy implications of this. Websites from eight professional sport leagues were hand-searched for programmes and impact reports. Suitable programmes were quantified, whilst impact reports were analysed via inductive documentary content analysis. Results identified 176 H&W programmes and 36 impact reports, as well as 43 H&W impact statements, but only 14 of these were aligned to specific H&W outcomes. The H&W aims of programmes were typically vague, measurement tools were rarely used, and evaluations were usually anecdotal case studies and based on engagement figures, which may not only limit the potential uptake of these programmes but also the relevance of PSCs to public policy. Further research is thus needed to build a stronger evidence base for the use of PSCs as vehicles of public health promotion and policy, and to better address the challenges faced when seeking to monitor and evaluate PSC programmes effectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2271904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2023.2271904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业体育俱乐部是促进健康的潜在有效场所;然而,它们在政策中的作用尚不清楚。潜在的原因包括缺乏对现有保健和福利方案的认识以及监测和评价做法的充足性。本次审查的目的是:(i)绘制由英国公共服务公司提供的卫生与健康项目的地图,以及(ii)探索公共服务公司目前的卫生与健康实践,并考虑其政策影响。来自八个职业体育联盟的网站手工搜索节目和影响报告。适当的方案是量化的,而影响报告是通过归纳纪录片内容分析分析。结果确定了176个卫生与健康项目和36个影响报告,以及43个卫生与健康影响报告,但其中只有14个与具体的卫生与健康结果相一致。方案的卫生和卫生目标通常含糊不清,很少使用衡量工具,评估通常是轶事案例研究和基于参与数字,这不仅可能限制这些方案的潜在吸收,而且也限制了公共服务和服务中心与公共政策的相关性。因此,需要进一步的研究,以建立一个更有力的证据基础,以利用公共卫生服务提供者作为促进公共卫生和制定政策的工具,并更好地应对在寻求有效监测和评价公共卫生服务提供者规划时所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mapping the provision and evaluation practices of local community health and wellbeing programmes delivered by professional sports clubs in England: a practice-based targeted review
Professional sports clubs (PSCs) are potentially effective settings for health promotion; however, their role within policy is unclear. Potential reasons include lack of awareness about existing provision of health and wellbeing (H&W) programmes and adequacy of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) practices. This review aimed to: (i) map the provision of H&W programmes delivered by PSCs in the United Kingdom (UK), and (ii) explore current M&E practices of PSCs and consider the policy implications of this. Websites from eight professional sport leagues were hand-searched for programmes and impact reports. Suitable programmes were quantified, whilst impact reports were analysed via inductive documentary content analysis. Results identified 176 H&W programmes and 36 impact reports, as well as 43 H&W impact statements, but only 14 of these were aligned to specific H&W outcomes. The H&W aims of programmes were typically vague, measurement tools were rarely used, and evaluations were usually anecdotal case studies and based on engagement figures, which may not only limit the potential uptake of these programmes but also the relevance of PSCs to public policy. Further research is thus needed to build a stronger evidence base for the use of PSCs as vehicles of public health promotion and policy, and to better address the challenges faced when seeking to monitor and evaluate PSC programmes effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Unlocking the power of sports: an exploration of the nexus between shared place, community competence, and sense of community Constraints and facilitators of elite athletes’ dual careers: a systematic literature review The arsenal of democracy? An examination of political regime types’ success in the global sporting arms race following the collapse of the iron curtain ‘Fog on the tyne’? The ‘common-sense’ focus on ‘sportswashing’ and the 2021 takeover of Newcastle United Power in mixed martial arts (MMA): a case study of the ultimate fighting championship (UFC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1