住房利基:住房和城市政策的新方向

IF 2.4 2区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES International Journal of Housing Policy Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1080/19491247.2023.2254466
Laura James, Lyrian Daniel, Rebecca Bentley, Emma Baker
{"title":"住房利基:住房和城市政策的新方向","authors":"Laura James, Lyrian Daniel, Rebecca Bentley, Emma Baker","doi":"10.1080/19491247.2023.2254466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractHousing influences life chances and trajectories through many roles, differently and in relation to the socioeconomic characteristics of people and population groups. This article uses the concept – ‘housing niches’ to present an alternative, bottom-up, plural and bundled view of housing and advantage . Using a large, representative sample of an Australian rental population (the Australian Rental Housing Conditions Dataset [ARHCD]), our analysis describes housing as multidimensional, bound across other aspects of people’s lives. Understanding advantage requires methodologies that capture risk as cumulative, mediated by multilevel social processes that expose and select particular populations to particular residential environments that contribute to people’s multiple disadvantage. Housing niches compel research and debate on comprehensive housing policy as not only necessary, but to have an imperative of cumulative risk and more broadly, inequality and poverty reduction.KEYWORDS: : Housinghousing nichespolicyAustralian rental housing conditions dataset (ARHCD) AcknowledgementWe convey sincere thanks to the reviewers whose many useful comments and considered suggestions greatly improved our manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Australian Research Council.","PeriodicalId":47119,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Housing Policy","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Housing niches: new directions for housing and urban policy\",\"authors\":\"Laura James, Lyrian Daniel, Rebecca Bentley, Emma Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19491247.2023.2254466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractHousing influences life chances and trajectories through many roles, differently and in relation to the socioeconomic characteristics of people and population groups. This article uses the concept – ‘housing niches’ to present an alternative, bottom-up, plural and bundled view of housing and advantage . Using a large, representative sample of an Australian rental population (the Australian Rental Housing Conditions Dataset [ARHCD]), our analysis describes housing as multidimensional, bound across other aspects of people’s lives. Understanding advantage requires methodologies that capture risk as cumulative, mediated by multilevel social processes that expose and select particular populations to particular residential environments that contribute to people’s multiple disadvantage. Housing niches compel research and debate on comprehensive housing policy as not only necessary, but to have an imperative of cumulative risk and more broadly, inequality and poverty reduction.KEYWORDS: : Housinghousing nichespolicyAustralian rental housing conditions dataset (ARHCD) AcknowledgementWe convey sincere thanks to the reviewers whose many useful comments and considered suggestions greatly improved our manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Australian Research Council.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Housing Policy\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Housing Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2023.2254466\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Housing Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2023.2254466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住房通过许多角色影响生活机会和轨迹,这些角色与人们和人口群体的社会经济特征不同且相关。本文使用“住房利基”的概念来呈现一种另类的、自下而上的、多元的、捆绑的住房和优势观点。使用澳大利亚出租人口的大型代表性样本(澳大利亚出租住房条件数据集[ARHCD]),我们的分析将住房描述为多维的,跨越人们生活的其他方面。理解优势需要的方法是将风险作为累积的,由多层次的社会过程介导,这些社会过程将特定人群暴露和选择到特定的居住环境中,从而导致人们的多重劣势。住房利基迫使对综合住房政策进行研究和辩论,这不仅是必要的,而且具有累积风险和更广泛的不平等和减贫的必要性。我们向审稿人表示衷心的感谢,他们的许多有用的意见和周到的建议极大地改进了我们的稿件。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究得到了澳大利亚研究委员会的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Housing niches: new directions for housing and urban policy
AbstractHousing influences life chances and trajectories through many roles, differently and in relation to the socioeconomic characteristics of people and population groups. This article uses the concept – ‘housing niches’ to present an alternative, bottom-up, plural and bundled view of housing and advantage . Using a large, representative sample of an Australian rental population (the Australian Rental Housing Conditions Dataset [ARHCD]), our analysis describes housing as multidimensional, bound across other aspects of people’s lives. Understanding advantage requires methodologies that capture risk as cumulative, mediated by multilevel social processes that expose and select particular populations to particular residential environments that contribute to people’s multiple disadvantage. Housing niches compel research and debate on comprehensive housing policy as not only necessary, but to have an imperative of cumulative risk and more broadly, inequality and poverty reduction.KEYWORDS: : Housinghousing nichespolicyAustralian rental housing conditions dataset (ARHCD) AcknowledgementWe convey sincere thanks to the reviewers whose many useful comments and considered suggestions greatly improved our manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Australian Research Council.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Housing Policy aims to be the leading forum for the critical analysis of housing policy, systems and practice from a social science perspective. It is published quartely. We welcome articles based on policy-relevant research and analysis focused on all parts of the world. We especially encourage papers that contribute to comparative housing analysis, but articles on national or sub-national housing systems are also welcome if they contain data, arguments or policy implications that are relevant to an international audience.
期刊最新文献
Analysis and Evaluation of Public Social Housing: tools for a Sustainable Regeneration A New Model for Housing Finance—Public and Private Sectors Working Together to Build Affordability Real estate for social purpose: varieties of entrepreneurialism in Toronto’s non-profit housing sector The Environments of Ageing: Space, Place and Materiality ‘The rent is too damn high’ meets ‘pay the rent’: practising solidarity with the dispossessed*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1