使用一种新型皮肤刺痛自动测试装置评估前臂皮肤刺痛位置

IF 3.3 Q2 ALLERGY Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2023.1289031
Sven F. Seys, Senne Gorris, Saartje Uyttebroek, Wout Backaert, Mark Jorissen, Rik Schrijvers, Rembert Daems, Dirk Loeckx, Laura Van Gerven, Peter W. Hellings
{"title":"使用一种新型皮肤刺痛自动测试装置评估前臂皮肤刺痛位置","authors":"Sven F. Seys, Senne Gorris, Saartje Uyttebroek, Wout Backaert, Mark Jorissen, Rik Schrijvers, Rembert Daems, Dirk Loeckx, Laura Van Gerven, Peter W. Hellings","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2023.1289031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The skin prick test (SPT) is the gold standard for identifying allergic sensitization in individuals suspected of having an inhalant allergy. Recently, it was demonstrated that SPT using a novel skin prick automated test (SPAT) device showed increased reproducibility and tolerability compared to the conventional SPT, among other benefits. Objective This study aimed to evaluate prick location bias using the novel SPAT device. Methods A total of 118 volunteers were enrolled in this study and underwent SPATs with histamine (nine pricks) and glycerol control (one prick) solutions on the volar side of their forearms. Imaging of the skin reactions was performed using the SPAT device, and the physician determined the longest wheal diameter by visually inspecting the images using a web interface. Prick location bias was assessed along the medial vs. lateral and proximal vs. distal axes of the forearm. Results In total, 944 histamine pricks were analyzed. Four medial and four lateral histamine pricks were grouped, and wheal sizes were compared. The longest wheal diameters were not significantly different between the medial and lateral prick locations ( p = 0.41). Furthermore, the pricks were grouped by two based on their position on the proximal–distal axis of the forearm. No significant difference was observed among the four groups of analyzed prick locations ( p = 0.73). Conclusion The prick location on the volar side of the forearm did not influence wheal size in SPAT-pricked individuals.","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":"33 1-2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of skin prick location on the forearm using a novel skin prick automated test device\",\"authors\":\"Sven F. Seys, Senne Gorris, Saartje Uyttebroek, Wout Backaert, Mark Jorissen, Rik Schrijvers, Rembert Daems, Dirk Loeckx, Laura Van Gerven, Peter W. Hellings\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/falgy.2023.1289031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The skin prick test (SPT) is the gold standard for identifying allergic sensitization in individuals suspected of having an inhalant allergy. Recently, it was demonstrated that SPT using a novel skin prick automated test (SPAT) device showed increased reproducibility and tolerability compared to the conventional SPT, among other benefits. Objective This study aimed to evaluate prick location bias using the novel SPAT device. Methods A total of 118 volunteers were enrolled in this study and underwent SPATs with histamine (nine pricks) and glycerol control (one prick) solutions on the volar side of their forearms. Imaging of the skin reactions was performed using the SPAT device, and the physician determined the longest wheal diameter by visually inspecting the images using a web interface. Prick location bias was assessed along the medial vs. lateral and proximal vs. distal axes of the forearm. Results In total, 944 histamine pricks were analyzed. Four medial and four lateral histamine pricks were grouped, and wheal sizes were compared. The longest wheal diameters were not significantly different between the medial and lateral prick locations ( p = 0.41). Furthermore, the pricks were grouped by two based on their position on the proximal–distal axis of the forearm. No significant difference was observed among the four groups of analyzed prick locations ( p = 0.73). Conclusion The prick location on the volar side of the forearm did not influence wheal size in SPAT-pricked individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in allergy\",\"volume\":\"33 1-2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1289031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1289031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:皮肤点刺试验(SPT)是鉴别疑似吸入性过敏患者的过敏致敏性的金标准。最近,研究表明,与传统的SPT相比,使用新型皮肤点刺自动测试(SPAT)设备的SPT具有更高的重复性和耐受性,以及其他优点。目的评价新型SPAT装置的点刺定位偏差。方法118名志愿者分别用组胺(9针)和甘油对照(1针)溶液在前臂掌侧进行SPATs。使用SPAT设备对皮肤反应进行成像,医生使用网络界面通过视觉检查图像来确定最长的轮径。沿前臂内侧轴与外侧轴、近端轴与远端轴评估针刺位置偏差。结果共检出944个组胺刺。4个内侧和4个外侧组胺刺被分组,并比较车轮大小。内侧和外侧刺点的最大轮径差异无统计学意义(p = 0.41)。此外,根据其在前臂近端和远端轴上的位置,将针刺分为两组。四组间针刺部位分析差异无统计学意义(p = 0.73)。结论spat刺痛个体的前臂掌侧刺痛位置对车轮大小没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of skin prick location on the forearm using a novel skin prick automated test device
Background The skin prick test (SPT) is the gold standard for identifying allergic sensitization in individuals suspected of having an inhalant allergy. Recently, it was demonstrated that SPT using a novel skin prick automated test (SPAT) device showed increased reproducibility and tolerability compared to the conventional SPT, among other benefits. Objective This study aimed to evaluate prick location bias using the novel SPAT device. Methods A total of 118 volunteers were enrolled in this study and underwent SPATs with histamine (nine pricks) and glycerol control (one prick) solutions on the volar side of their forearms. Imaging of the skin reactions was performed using the SPAT device, and the physician determined the longest wheal diameter by visually inspecting the images using a web interface. Prick location bias was assessed along the medial vs. lateral and proximal vs. distal axes of the forearm. Results In total, 944 histamine pricks were analyzed. Four medial and four lateral histamine pricks were grouped, and wheal sizes were compared. The longest wheal diameters were not significantly different between the medial and lateral prick locations ( p = 0.41). Furthermore, the pricks were grouped by two based on their position on the proximal–distal axis of the forearm. No significant difference was observed among the four groups of analyzed prick locations ( p = 0.73). Conclusion The prick location on the volar side of the forearm did not influence wheal size in SPAT-pricked individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing the predictive potential of ADAM8 for disease control in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. The future of food allergy diagnosis. Unraveling heterogeneity and treatment of asthma through integrating multi-omics data. Case Report: Anaphylaxis caused by traditional Chinese medicine in a patient with pollinosis. Case Report: Dual monoclonal antibody therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and severe eosinophilic asthma-a proteome analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1