使用非连续伽勒金方法的欧拉方程线性低强度稳定方法

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1002/fld.5243
Michel Bänsch, Jörn Behrens, Stefan Vater
{"title":"使用非连续伽勒金方法的欧拉方程线性低强度稳定方法","authors":"Michel Bänsch,&nbsp;Jörn Behrens,&nbsp;Stefan Vater","doi":"10.1002/fld.5243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present a novel and simple yet intuitive approach to the stabilization problem for the numerically solved Euler equations with gravity source term relying on a low-order nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Method (DGM). Instead of assuming isothermal or polytropic solutions, we only take a hydrostatic balance as a given property of the flow and use the hydrostatic equation to calculate a hydrostatic pressure reconstruction that replaces the gravity source term. We compare two environments that both solve the Euler equations using the DGM: deal.II and StormFlash. We utilize StormFlash as it allows for the use of the novel stabilization method. Without stabilization, StormFlash does not yield results that resemble correct physical behavior while the results with stabilization for StormFlash, as well as deal.II model the fluid flow more accurately. Convergence rates for deal.II do not match the expected order while the convergence rates for StormFlash with the stabilization scheme (with the exceptions for the L<math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mrow></mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {}_2 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> errors for momentum) meet the expectation. The results from StormFlash with stabilization also fit reference solutions from the literature much better than those from deal.II. We conclude that this novel scheme is a low cost approach to stabilize the Euler equations while not limiting the flow in any way other than it being in hydrostatic balance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fld.5243","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A linear low effort stabilization method for the Euler equations using discontinuous Galerkin methods\",\"authors\":\"Michel Bänsch,&nbsp;Jörn Behrens,&nbsp;Stefan Vater\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fld.5243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We present a novel and simple yet intuitive approach to the stabilization problem for the numerically solved Euler equations with gravity source term relying on a low-order nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Method (DGM). Instead of assuming isothermal or polytropic solutions, we only take a hydrostatic balance as a given property of the flow and use the hydrostatic equation to calculate a hydrostatic pressure reconstruction that replaces the gravity source term. We compare two environments that both solve the Euler equations using the DGM: deal.II and StormFlash. We utilize StormFlash as it allows for the use of the novel stabilization method. Without stabilization, StormFlash does not yield results that resemble correct physical behavior while the results with stabilization for StormFlash, as well as deal.II model the fluid flow more accurately. Convergence rates for deal.II do not match the expected order while the convergence rates for StormFlash with the stabilization scheme (with the exceptions for the L<math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mrow></mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {}_2 $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> errors for momentum) meet the expectation. The results from StormFlash with stabilization also fit reference solutions from the literature much better than those from deal.II. We conclude that this novel scheme is a low cost approach to stabilize the Euler equations while not limiting the flow in any way other than it being in hydrostatic balance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fld.5243\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5243\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于带有重力源项的欧拉方程数值求解,我们提出了一种新颖、简单而直观的方法,即依靠低阶节点非连续伽勒金方法(DGM)来解决稳定问题。我们不假设等温或多向解,只将静水平衡作为流动的给定属性,并使用静水方程计算静水压力重构,以取代重力源项。我们比较了两种均使用 DGM 求解欧拉方程的环境:deal.II 和 StormFlash。我们使用 StormFlash,因为它允许使用新颖的稳定方法。在没有稳定方法的情况下,StormFlash 得出的结果与正确的物理行为并不相似,而 StormFlash 和 deal.II 使用稳定方法得出的结果则能更准确地模拟流体流动。deal.II 的收敛速率与预期阶数不符,而采用稳定方案的 StormFlash 的收敛速率(动量的 L 2 $$ {}_2 $$ 误差除外)符合预期。采用稳定方案的 StormFlash 的结果也比 deal.II 的结果更符合文献中的参考解。我们的结论是,这种新方案是稳定欧拉方程的低成本方法,同时除了流体静力学平衡外,不会以任何方式限制流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A linear low effort stabilization method for the Euler equations using discontinuous Galerkin methods

We present a novel and simple yet intuitive approach to the stabilization problem for the numerically solved Euler equations with gravity source term relying on a low-order nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Method (DGM). Instead of assuming isothermal or polytropic solutions, we only take a hydrostatic balance as a given property of the flow and use the hydrostatic equation to calculate a hydrostatic pressure reconstruction that replaces the gravity source term. We compare two environments that both solve the Euler equations using the DGM: deal.II and StormFlash. We utilize StormFlash as it allows for the use of the novel stabilization method. Without stabilization, StormFlash does not yield results that resemble correct physical behavior while the results with stabilization for StormFlash, as well as deal.II model the fluid flow more accurately. Convergence rates for deal.II do not match the expected order while the convergence rates for StormFlash with the stabilization scheme (with the exceptions for the L 2 $$ {}_2 $$ errors for momentum) meet the expectation. The results from StormFlash with stabilization also fit reference solutions from the literature much better than those from deal.II. We conclude that this novel scheme is a low cost approach to stabilize the Euler equations while not limiting the flow in any way other than it being in hydrostatic balance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction. Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review. The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.
期刊最新文献
Semi‐implicit Lagrangian Voronoi approximation for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations A new non‐equilibrium modification of the k−ω$$ k-\omega $$ turbulence model for supersonic turbulent flows with transverse jet Response surface method‐based hydraulic performance optimization of a single‐stage centrifugal pump Development of a new solver for homogenous mixture based on regularized gas dynamic equation system Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1