大学对合作研究的吸收能力:研究组织学习与社区合作伙伴参与研究的挑战和机遇

IF 1.5 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Community Practice Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1080/10705422.2023.2273912
Moonhawk Kim, Valerie B. Shapiro, Emily J. Ozer, Susan Stone, Brian Villa, Marieka Schotland, Colleen Kohashi
{"title":"大学对合作研究的吸收能力:研究组织学习与社区合作伙伴参与研究的挑战和机遇","authors":"Moonhawk Kim, Valerie B. Shapiro, Emily J. Ozer, Susan Stone, Brian Villa, Marieka Schotland, Colleen Kohashi","doi":"10.1080/10705422.2023.2273912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe study and the practice of collaborative research between university researchers and community entities of various types have generally focused on the organizational conditions that facilitate community partners to make use of research knowledge. In this article, we propose a conceptual innovation that absorptive capacity – the ability to identify helpful new information and to absorb and apply it in new ways – is important not only for community entities but also for universities. Using our experience of collaborating at the University of California Berkeley between scholars engaged in collaborative research and Institutional Review Board (IRB) analysts, we examine the dimensions of absorptive capacity – prior knowledge, communication pathways, strategic knowledge leadership, and resources – in the university context. The analysis generates insights that recommend 1) further research into the conditions and the processes of organizational learning for collaborative research in universities and 2) strategies for practitioners of collaborative research to strengthen and improve universities’ capacity to engage in it.KEYWORDS: Community-engaged scholarshipinstitutional review board AcknowledgmentsThis project was made possible by the generous support of the W.T. Grant Institutional Challenge Grant, supported by the W.T. Grant and Doris Duke Charitable Foundations. The authors wish to acknowledge the many community partners with whom we have collaborated with over the years to conduct community-engaged scholarship, including San Francisco Peer Resources, SF Unified School District, EOYDC (the East Oakland Youth Development Center), and the RYSE Youth Center. The authors also thank colleagues at Innovations for Youth (i4Y), particularly the i4Y Steering Committee, who played essential roles in the completion of this work. The authors appreciate the support and consultation of many Berkeley Senate faculty and administrative leaders who have engaged with this institutional change effort, and the support of the UC-Berkeley Vice Chancellor for Research Office, Dean Michael Lu (Public Health), Dean Linda Burton (Social Welfare), Dean Emeriti Prudence Carter (Education), and Interim Dean Christopher Edley (Education). The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of any funding agency, community partner, university leader, or consultant. Valerie Shapiro would like to acknowledge the W.T. Grant Foundation Scholars Award for supporting her research and career development in thinking about how to promote the use of research evidence to improve the lives of young people.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. We use “collaborative education research” or CER instead of collaborative research, when referring to specific efforts, scholars or literature about collaborative research in the field of education.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (#71748), William T. Grant Foundation's Institutional Challenge Grant (#71698), and William T. Grant Scholars Award (#190407).","PeriodicalId":46385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Practice","volume":"50 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University’s absorptive capacity for collaborative research: examining challenges and opportunities for organizational learning to engage in research with community partners\",\"authors\":\"Moonhawk Kim, Valerie B. Shapiro, Emily J. Ozer, Susan Stone, Brian Villa, Marieka Schotland, Colleen Kohashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10705422.2023.2273912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe study and the practice of collaborative research between university researchers and community entities of various types have generally focused on the organizational conditions that facilitate community partners to make use of research knowledge. In this article, we propose a conceptual innovation that absorptive capacity – the ability to identify helpful new information and to absorb and apply it in new ways – is important not only for community entities but also for universities. Using our experience of collaborating at the University of California Berkeley between scholars engaged in collaborative research and Institutional Review Board (IRB) analysts, we examine the dimensions of absorptive capacity – prior knowledge, communication pathways, strategic knowledge leadership, and resources – in the university context. The analysis generates insights that recommend 1) further research into the conditions and the processes of organizational learning for collaborative research in universities and 2) strategies for practitioners of collaborative research to strengthen and improve universities’ capacity to engage in it.KEYWORDS: Community-engaged scholarshipinstitutional review board AcknowledgmentsThis project was made possible by the generous support of the W.T. Grant Institutional Challenge Grant, supported by the W.T. Grant and Doris Duke Charitable Foundations. The authors wish to acknowledge the many community partners with whom we have collaborated with over the years to conduct community-engaged scholarship, including San Francisco Peer Resources, SF Unified School District, EOYDC (the East Oakland Youth Development Center), and the RYSE Youth Center. The authors also thank colleagues at Innovations for Youth (i4Y), particularly the i4Y Steering Committee, who played essential roles in the completion of this work. The authors appreciate the support and consultation of many Berkeley Senate faculty and administrative leaders who have engaged with this institutional change effort, and the support of the UC-Berkeley Vice Chancellor for Research Office, Dean Michael Lu (Public Health), Dean Linda Burton (Social Welfare), Dean Emeriti Prudence Carter (Education), and Interim Dean Christopher Edley (Education). The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of any funding agency, community partner, university leader, or consultant. Valerie Shapiro would like to acknowledge the W.T. Grant Foundation Scholars Award for supporting her research and career development in thinking about how to promote the use of research evidence to improve the lives of young people.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. We use “collaborative education research” or CER instead of collaborative research, when referring to specific efforts, scholars or literature about collaborative research in the field of education.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (#71748), William T. Grant Foundation's Institutional Challenge Grant (#71698), and William T. Grant Scholars Award (#190407).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Practice\",\"volume\":\"50 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2023.2273912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2023.2273912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要大学研究人员与各类社区实体之间的合作研究与实践,一般关注于促进社区伙伴利用研究知识的组织条件。在本文中,我们提出了一种概念上的创新,即吸收能力——识别有用的新信息并以新的方式吸收和应用它的能力——不仅对社区实体很重要,对大学也很重要。利用我们在加州大学伯克利分校从事合作研究的学者和机构审查委员会(IRB)分析师之间的合作经验,我们研究了大学背景下吸收能力的维度——先验知识、沟通途径、战略知识领导和资源。该分析产生的见解建议:1)进一步研究大学合作研究的组织学习条件和过程;2)合作研究的实践者加强和提高大学参与合作研究的能力的策略。本项目得到了W.T.格兰特机构挑战基金的慷慨支持,并得到了W.T.格兰特和多丽丝·杜克慈善基金会的支持。作者希望感谢多年来与我们合作开展社区参与奖学金的许多社区合作伙伴,包括旧金山同伴资源,SF联合学区,EOYDC(东奥克兰青年发展中心)和RYSE青年中心。作者还感谢青年创新(i4Y)的同事,特别是i4Y指导委员会,他们在完成这项工作中发挥了重要作用。作者感谢许多伯克利参议院教师和行政领导的支持和咨询,他们参与了这一制度变革的努力,以及加州大学伯克利分校研究办公室副校长,院长Michael Lu(公共卫生),院长Linda Burton(社会福利),院长Prudence Carter(教育)和临时院长Christopher Edley(教育)的支持。本文表达的观点不一定反映任何资助机构、社区合作伙伴、大学领导或顾问的观点。瓦莱丽·夏皮罗要感谢W.T.格兰特基金会学者奖对她的研究和职业发展的支持,她思考如何促进使用研究证据来改善年轻人的生活。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。在提到教育领域的合作研究的具体努力、学者或文献时,我们使用“合作教育研究”(CER)来代替合作研究。这项工作得到了多丽丝·杜克慈善基金会(#71748)、威廉·t·格兰特基金会的机构挑战基金(#71698)和威廉·t·格兰特学者奖(#190407)的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
University’s absorptive capacity for collaborative research: examining challenges and opportunities for organizational learning to engage in research with community partners
ABSTRACTThe study and the practice of collaborative research between university researchers and community entities of various types have generally focused on the organizational conditions that facilitate community partners to make use of research knowledge. In this article, we propose a conceptual innovation that absorptive capacity – the ability to identify helpful new information and to absorb and apply it in new ways – is important not only for community entities but also for universities. Using our experience of collaborating at the University of California Berkeley between scholars engaged in collaborative research and Institutional Review Board (IRB) analysts, we examine the dimensions of absorptive capacity – prior knowledge, communication pathways, strategic knowledge leadership, and resources – in the university context. The analysis generates insights that recommend 1) further research into the conditions and the processes of organizational learning for collaborative research in universities and 2) strategies for practitioners of collaborative research to strengthen and improve universities’ capacity to engage in it.KEYWORDS: Community-engaged scholarshipinstitutional review board AcknowledgmentsThis project was made possible by the generous support of the W.T. Grant Institutional Challenge Grant, supported by the W.T. Grant and Doris Duke Charitable Foundations. The authors wish to acknowledge the many community partners with whom we have collaborated with over the years to conduct community-engaged scholarship, including San Francisco Peer Resources, SF Unified School District, EOYDC (the East Oakland Youth Development Center), and the RYSE Youth Center. The authors also thank colleagues at Innovations for Youth (i4Y), particularly the i4Y Steering Committee, who played essential roles in the completion of this work. The authors appreciate the support and consultation of many Berkeley Senate faculty and administrative leaders who have engaged with this institutional change effort, and the support of the UC-Berkeley Vice Chancellor for Research Office, Dean Michael Lu (Public Health), Dean Linda Burton (Social Welfare), Dean Emeriti Prudence Carter (Education), and Interim Dean Christopher Edley (Education). The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of any funding agency, community partner, university leader, or consultant. Valerie Shapiro would like to acknowledge the W.T. Grant Foundation Scholars Award for supporting her research and career development in thinking about how to promote the use of research evidence to improve the lives of young people.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. We use “collaborative education research” or CER instead of collaborative research, when referring to specific efforts, scholars or literature about collaborative research in the field of education.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (#71748), William T. Grant Foundation's Institutional Challenge Grant (#71698), and William T. Grant Scholars Award (#190407).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Practice is an interdisciplinary journal grounded in social work. It is designed to provide a forum for community practice, including community organizing, planning, social administration, organizational development, community development, and social change. The journal contributes to the advancement of knowledge related to numerous disciplines, including social work and the social sciences, urban planning, social and economic development, community organizing, policy analysis, urban and rural sociology, community health, public administration, and nonprofit management. As a forum for authors and a resource for readers, this journal makes an invaluable contribution to the community"s conceptualization, applications, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Community organizing and engagement for social change Training community organizers in the austerity state: lessons from the field Remembering and storytelling: community engagement through a service-learning partnership Cultivating community-engaged pedagogy: a case study exploring student choices with community-based organizations in a volunteer management course Facing power: navigating power dynamics in a youth participatory action research project situated within a healthcare setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1