开放式研发项目中创新建设性偏差的知识代理行为

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS R&D Management Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1111/radm.12651
Sana Larif, Moez Essid, Sylvaine Castellano, Insaf Khelladi
{"title":"开放式研发项目中创新建设性偏差的知识代理行为","authors":"Sana Larif, Moez Essid, Sylvaine Castellano, Insaf Khelladi","doi":"10.1111/radm.12651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the two sides of deviant behaviors and the fact that knowledge brokers are sometimes presented in a negative light due to their unique position, this article unveils from an innovation perspective how these two intricate individual‐level concepts bring positive outcomes in complex environments. While previous work has highlighted the positive impact of constructive workplace deviance on organizations and their members, research on the antecedents of such deviance is scarce. We use knowledge brokers as an unexplored and pertinent means of enacting innovative constructive deviance. Indeed, knowledge brokering supports innovation by connecting, recombining, and transferring disconnected pools of ideas. A case study of a high‐tech company was conducted. We focused on three B2C and B2B co‐creation projects as one of the main open innovation strategies. The results suggest that knowledge‐brokering activities with customers or partner firms enact innovative constructive deviance in different ways and accelerate creativity and innovation within the organization. This paper contributes to the debate on deviant behaviors and brokering activities within the open innovation paradigm. We enrich the microfoundational perspective of the open innovation literature, shed light on the determinants of innovative constructive deviance, and provide empirical evidence of the relationship between brokering activities and deviant behavior. On a managerial level, the findings suggest that knowledge‐brokering activities among multiple stakeholders foster innovative behaviors within co‐creation projects.","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge‐brokering activities as enactors of innovative constructive deviance in open R&D projects\",\"authors\":\"Sana Larif, Moez Essid, Sylvaine Castellano, Insaf Khelladi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/radm.12651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the two sides of deviant behaviors and the fact that knowledge brokers are sometimes presented in a negative light due to their unique position, this article unveils from an innovation perspective how these two intricate individual‐level concepts bring positive outcomes in complex environments. While previous work has highlighted the positive impact of constructive workplace deviance on organizations and their members, research on the antecedents of such deviance is scarce. We use knowledge brokers as an unexplored and pertinent means of enacting innovative constructive deviance. Indeed, knowledge brokering supports innovation by connecting, recombining, and transferring disconnected pools of ideas. A case study of a high‐tech company was conducted. We focused on three B2C and B2B co‐creation projects as one of the main open innovation strategies. The results suggest that knowledge‐brokering activities with customers or partner firms enact innovative constructive deviance in different ways and accelerate creativity and innovation within the organization. This paper contributes to the debate on deviant behaviors and brokering activities within the open innovation paradigm. We enrich the microfoundational perspective of the open innovation literature, shed light on the determinants of innovative constructive deviance, and provide empirical evidence of the relationship between brokering activities and deviant behavior. On a managerial level, the findings suggest that knowledge‐brokering activities among multiple stakeholders foster innovative behaviors within co‐creation projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"R&D Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"R&D Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12651\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"R&D Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管越轨行为有两个方面,而且知识经纪人由于其独特的地位有时被认为是消极的,但本文从创新的角度揭示了这两个复杂的个人层面的概念如何在复杂的环境中带来积极的结果。虽然以前的工作强调了建设性工作场所偏差对组织及其成员的积极影响,但对这种偏差的前因的研究却很少。我们使用知识经纪人作为制定创新的建设性偏差的一种未经探索和相关的手段。事实上,知识中介通过连接、重组和转移不相关的思想池来支持创新。以某高新技术企业为例进行了研究。我们专注于三个B2C和B2B共同创造项目,作为主要的开放式创新战略之一。结果表明,与客户或合作伙伴公司的知识代理活动以不同的方式实施了创新的建设性偏差,并加速了组织内部的创造力和创新。本文对开放式创新范式下的越轨行为和中介行为进行了探讨。我们丰富了开放创新文献的微观基础视角,揭示了创新建设性越轨行为的决定因素,并提供了中介活动与越轨行为之间关系的实证证据。在管理层面上,研究结果表明,多个利益相关者之间的知识中介活动促进了共同创造项目中的创新行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge‐brokering activities as enactors of innovative constructive deviance in open R&D projects
Despite the two sides of deviant behaviors and the fact that knowledge brokers are sometimes presented in a negative light due to their unique position, this article unveils from an innovation perspective how these two intricate individual‐level concepts bring positive outcomes in complex environments. While previous work has highlighted the positive impact of constructive workplace deviance on organizations and their members, research on the antecedents of such deviance is scarce. We use knowledge brokers as an unexplored and pertinent means of enacting innovative constructive deviance. Indeed, knowledge brokering supports innovation by connecting, recombining, and transferring disconnected pools of ideas. A case study of a high‐tech company was conducted. We focused on three B2C and B2B co‐creation projects as one of the main open innovation strategies. The results suggest that knowledge‐brokering activities with customers or partner firms enact innovative constructive deviance in different ways and accelerate creativity and innovation within the organization. This paper contributes to the debate on deviant behaviors and brokering activities within the open innovation paradigm. We enrich the microfoundational perspective of the open innovation literature, shed light on the determinants of innovative constructive deviance, and provide empirical evidence of the relationship between brokering activities and deviant behavior. On a managerial level, the findings suggest that knowledge‐brokering activities among multiple stakeholders foster innovative behaviors within co‐creation projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
R&D Management
R&D Management Multiple-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: R&D Management journal publishes articles which address the interests of both practising managers and academic researchers in research and development and innovation management. Covering the full range of topics in research, development, design and innovation, and related strategic and human resource issues - from exploratory science to commercial exploitation - articles also examine social, economic and environmental implications.
期刊最新文献
Roles of big data analytics and organizational culture in developing innovation capabilities: a hybrid PLS‐fsQCA approach Research, patents, and IPO valuation under the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 A Research Agenda for Workplace Innovation: The Challenge of Disruptive Transitions. Edited by Peter R. A.Oeij, StevenDhondt, Adela J.McMurray, Edgar Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2023, 978‐1‐80088‐193‐8, hardback, £115.49, pp. 304. The relationship between digital technologies and the circular economy: a systematic literature review and a research agenda Evolutionary Ideas: Unlocking Ancient Innovation to Solve Tomorrow's Challenges. By SamTatam, Harriman House Publishing: Hampshire, 2022, ISBN 978‐0‐85719‐787‐0, paperback, £9.99, pp. 240.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1