全球变暖和大气碳:碳封存是神话还是现实?

Stephen Obinozie Ogwu, Afamefuna A. Eze, Joshua C. Uzoigwe, Anthony Orji, Anne Chinonye Maduka, Joshua Chukwuma Onwe
{"title":"全球变暖和大气碳:碳封存是神话还是现实?","authors":"Stephen Obinozie Ogwu, Afamefuna A. Eze, Joshua C. Uzoigwe, Anthony Orji, Anne Chinonye Maduka, Joshua Chukwuma Onwe","doi":"10.2478/sues-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Biotic and abiotic carbon sequestration currently seems to be the only viable tools at the disposal of mankind for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and thus a remedy for tackling global warming challenges. This study accesses the global carbon capture and storage (CCS) programme: the level of success in its implementation and its impact using panel data from eight countries, the majority of which have begun one or more operational CCS facilities. To achieve this objective, fifteen years period time series data was sourced for the eight selected countries based on data availability, namely the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, China, Australia, Norway, South Africa, and Nigeria; ranging from 1990 to 2015. The panel ARDL results show that the explanatory variables, global industrial production (LIP), Electricity production (LEP), Agricultural production (LAP), transportation (LTR), and energy supply (LES) have a long-run relationship with the dependent variable (LGHG emissions). While the short-run results show that none of the variables have a significant contribution to LGHG emissions. In the long-run results, LIP and LTR significantly contribute to the reduction of LGHG courtesy of the CCS programme while LEP, LAP, and LES contribute to a rise in the LGHG emission. The cross-sectional results show that all the variables have significant impacts on LGHG in all the sampled countries except Australia. Suggesting that, the CCS programme is viable for mitigating global warming and climate change and therefore should be considered by the various countries of the world.","PeriodicalId":40730,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldis Arad Seria Stiinte Economice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Warming and Atmospheric Carbon: Is Carbon Sequestration a Myth or Reality?\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Obinozie Ogwu, Afamefuna A. Eze, Joshua C. Uzoigwe, Anthony Orji, Anne Chinonye Maduka, Joshua Chukwuma Onwe\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sues-2023-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Biotic and abiotic carbon sequestration currently seems to be the only viable tools at the disposal of mankind for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and thus a remedy for tackling global warming challenges. This study accesses the global carbon capture and storage (CCS) programme: the level of success in its implementation and its impact using panel data from eight countries, the majority of which have begun one or more operational CCS facilities. To achieve this objective, fifteen years period time series data was sourced for the eight selected countries based on data availability, namely the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, China, Australia, Norway, South Africa, and Nigeria; ranging from 1990 to 2015. The panel ARDL results show that the explanatory variables, global industrial production (LIP), Electricity production (LEP), Agricultural production (LAP), transportation (LTR), and energy supply (LES) have a long-run relationship with the dependent variable (LGHG emissions). While the short-run results show that none of the variables have a significant contribution to LGHG emissions. In the long-run results, LIP and LTR significantly contribute to the reduction of LGHG courtesy of the CCS programme while LEP, LAP, and LES contribute to a rise in the LGHG emission. The cross-sectional results show that all the variables have significant impacts on LGHG in all the sampled countries except Australia. Suggesting that, the CCS programme is viable for mitigating global warming and climate change and therefore should be considered by the various countries of the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldis Arad Seria Stiinte Economice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldis Arad Seria Stiinte Economice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2023-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldis Arad Seria Stiinte Economice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物和非生物碳封存目前似乎是人类减少温室气体(GHG)排放的唯一可行工具,因此是应对全球变暖挑战的补救措施。本研究利用来自八个国家的面板数据访问了全球碳捕集与封存(CCS)计划:其实施的成功程度及其影响,其中大多数国家已经开始运营一个或多个CCS设施。为了实现这一目标,根据数据的可用性,为八个选定的国家提供了15年期间的时间序列数据,即美国、英国、加拿大、中国、澳大利亚、挪威、南非和尼日利亚;从1990年到2015年。面板ARDL结果表明,解释变量全球工业生产(LIP)、电力生产(LEP)、农业生产(LAP)、交通运输(LTR)和能源供应(LES)与因变量(LGHG排放)之间存在长期关系。而短期结果表明,没有一个变量对LGHG排放有显著贡献。在长期结果中,由于CCS计划,LIP和LTR显著有助于减少LGHG,而LEP、LAP和LES则有助于增加LGHG排放。横截面结果表明,除澳大利亚外,所有变量对LGHG均有显著影响。这表明CCS计划对于减缓全球变暖和气候变化是可行的,因此应该被世界各国考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global Warming and Atmospheric Carbon: Is Carbon Sequestration a Myth or Reality?
Abstract Biotic and abiotic carbon sequestration currently seems to be the only viable tools at the disposal of mankind for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and thus a remedy for tackling global warming challenges. This study accesses the global carbon capture and storage (CCS) programme: the level of success in its implementation and its impact using panel data from eight countries, the majority of which have begun one or more operational CCS facilities. To achieve this objective, fifteen years period time series data was sourced for the eight selected countries based on data availability, namely the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, China, Australia, Norway, South Africa, and Nigeria; ranging from 1990 to 2015. The panel ARDL results show that the explanatory variables, global industrial production (LIP), Electricity production (LEP), Agricultural production (LAP), transportation (LTR), and energy supply (LES) have a long-run relationship with the dependent variable (LGHG emissions). While the short-run results show that none of the variables have a significant contribution to LGHG emissions. In the long-run results, LIP and LTR significantly contribute to the reduction of LGHG courtesy of the CCS programme while LEP, LAP, and LES contribute to a rise in the LGHG emission. The cross-sectional results show that all the variables have significant impacts on LGHG in all the sampled countries except Australia. Suggesting that, the CCS programme is viable for mitigating global warming and climate change and therefore should be considered by the various countries of the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
42.90%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Various Convexities and Some Relevant Properties of Consumer Preference Relations Domestic Investment and Economic Growth Nexus: Does Absorptive Capacity Matter in The African Countries? The Examination of the Relationship Between Foreign Direct Investment and Trade in Turkey: ARDL Approach Indian Government Schemes Based Analysis on Women Empowerment In Financial Inclusion Analysis of Labor Market Transformation in the Context of Industry 4.0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1