衡量英国高收入人群占比

Arun Advani, Andy Summers, Hannah Tarrant
{"title":"衡量英国高收入人群占比","authors":"Arun Advani, Andy Summers, Hannah Tarrant","doi":"10.1093/jrsssa/qnac008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Information about the share of total income held by the richest 1%, or other top income groups, is increasingly used to discuss inequality levels and trends within and between nations. A top income share is the ratio of the total income held by the top income group divided by total personal income (the ‘income control total’). We compare two approaches to estimating income control totals: the ‘external’ approach used by the World Inequality Database, and an augmented ‘internal’ approach. We argue in favour of the latter, with reference to five desirable properties that a top share series would ideally possess. The choice matters: our augmented ‘internal’ approach yields estimates of the UK top 1% share that are around 2% points higher than the ‘external’ approach.","PeriodicalId":49985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring top income shares in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Arun Advani, Andy Summers, Hannah Tarrant\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrsssa/qnac008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Information about the share of total income held by the richest 1%, or other top income groups, is increasingly used to discuss inequality levels and trends within and between nations. A top income share is the ratio of the total income held by the top income group divided by total personal income (the ‘income control total’). We compare two approaches to estimating income control totals: the ‘external’ approach used by the World Inequality Database, and an augmented ‘internal’ approach. We argue in favour of the latter, with reference to five desirable properties that a top share series would ideally possess. The choice matters: our augmented ‘internal’ approach yields estimates of the UK top 1% share that are around 2% points higher than the ‘external’ approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnac008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnac008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于最富有的1%或其他最高收入群体所持有的总收入份额的信息,越来越多地用于讨论国家内部和国家之间的不平等水平和趋势。最高收入份额是最高收入群体持有的总收入除以个人总收入(“收入控制总额”)的比率。我们比较了估算收入控制总量的两种方法:世界不平等数据库使用的“外部”方法和增强的“内部”方法。我们支持后者,参考了顶级股票系列理想拥有的五个理想属性。选择很重要:我们扩大了“内部”方法对英国前1%份额的收益率估计,比“外部”方法高出约2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring top income shares in the UK
Abstract Information about the share of total income held by the richest 1%, or other top income groups, is increasingly used to discuss inequality levels and trends within and between nations. A top income share is the ratio of the total income held by the top income group divided by total personal income (the ‘income control total’). We compare two approaches to estimating income control totals: the ‘external’ approach used by the World Inequality Database, and an augmented ‘internal’ approach. We argue in favour of the latter, with reference to five desirable properties that a top share series would ideally possess. The choice matters: our augmented ‘internal’ approach yields estimates of the UK top 1% share that are around 2% points higher than the ‘external’ approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian approach to estimate annual bilateral migration flows for South America using census data Exploring Modeling with Data and Differential Equations Using R Calyampudi Radhakrishna (CR) Rao 1920–2023 Representative pure risk estimation by using data from epidemiologic studies, surveys, and registries: estimating risks for minority subgroups Where the bee sucks: a dynamic Bayesian network approach to decision support for pollinator abundance strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1