{"title":"听觉分心的心理生理标记:范围回顾","authors":"Alexandre Marois, François Vachon","doi":"10.1080/25742442.2023.2274270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Short-term memory can be disrupted by task-irrelevant sound. Auditory distraction has been globally studied under the lens of two main phenomena: the deviation effect and the changing-state effect. Yet, it remains unclear whether they rely on common cerebral mechanisms and, concomitantly, what psychophysiological responses they can trigger. This scoping review provides a state of knowledge regarding psychophysiological indices of auditory distraction. Records published between 2001 and 2021 on the deviation effect and the changing-state effect with psychophysiological measures were extracted from PubMed, ERIC, PsycNet, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. Records investigating task-relevant sounds, as well as those that failed to observe performance disruption, or to include a control condition or a concurrent cognitive task, were excluded from the review. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used for bias evaluation. Fifteen records were reviewed, mainly characterized by randomization, measurement and selection of results biases. Some markers were specific to the distraction type, but nonspecific responses were also found. Overall, we outline the main markers used to index auditory distraction, present their meaning for understanding underpinning mechanisms, and discuss implications and knowledge gaps that need to be filled to fully exploit psychophysiology for auditory distraction research.","PeriodicalId":72332,"journal":{"name":"Auditory perception & cognition","volume":" 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychophysiological Markers of Auditory Distraction: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Marois, François Vachon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25742442.2023.2274270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Short-term memory can be disrupted by task-irrelevant sound. Auditory distraction has been globally studied under the lens of two main phenomena: the deviation effect and the changing-state effect. Yet, it remains unclear whether they rely on common cerebral mechanisms and, concomitantly, what psychophysiological responses they can trigger. This scoping review provides a state of knowledge regarding psychophysiological indices of auditory distraction. Records published between 2001 and 2021 on the deviation effect and the changing-state effect with psychophysiological measures were extracted from PubMed, ERIC, PsycNet, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. Records investigating task-relevant sounds, as well as those that failed to observe performance disruption, or to include a control condition or a concurrent cognitive task, were excluded from the review. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used for bias evaluation. Fifteen records were reviewed, mainly characterized by randomization, measurement and selection of results biases. Some markers were specific to the distraction type, but nonspecific responses were also found. Overall, we outline the main markers used to index auditory distraction, present their meaning for understanding underpinning mechanisms, and discuss implications and knowledge gaps that need to be filled to fully exploit psychophysiology for auditory distraction research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory perception & cognition\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory perception & cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2023.2274270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory perception & cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2023.2274270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
短期记忆会被与任务无关的声音打断。全球范围内对听觉分心的研究主要有两种现象:偏离效应和状态变化效应。然而,目前尚不清楚它们是否依赖于共同的大脑机制,以及它们能引发什么样的心理生理反应。本综述提供了一个关于听觉分心的心理生理指标的知识状态。从PubMed、ERIC、PsycNet、Web of Science和ScienceDirect中提取2001 - 2021年间发表的关于心理生理测量的偏差效应和状态变化效应的记录。调查任务相关声音的记录,以及那些未能观察到表现中断,或包括控制条件或并发认知任务的记录,都被排除在审查之外。采用Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚评估工具进行偏倚评估。回顾了15条记录,主要特点是随机化、测量和结果偏差选择。一些标记是特定于分心类型的,但也发现了非特异性反应。总体而言,我们概述了用于索引听觉分心的主要标记,提出了它们对理解基础机制的意义,并讨论了充分利用听觉分心研究的心理生理学需要填补的含义和知识空白。
Psychophysiological Markers of Auditory Distraction: A Scoping Review
Short-term memory can be disrupted by task-irrelevant sound. Auditory distraction has been globally studied under the lens of two main phenomena: the deviation effect and the changing-state effect. Yet, it remains unclear whether they rely on common cerebral mechanisms and, concomitantly, what psychophysiological responses they can trigger. This scoping review provides a state of knowledge regarding psychophysiological indices of auditory distraction. Records published between 2001 and 2021 on the deviation effect and the changing-state effect with psychophysiological measures were extracted from PubMed, ERIC, PsycNet, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. Records investigating task-relevant sounds, as well as those that failed to observe performance disruption, or to include a control condition or a concurrent cognitive task, were excluded from the review. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used for bias evaluation. Fifteen records were reviewed, mainly characterized by randomization, measurement and selection of results biases. Some markers were specific to the distraction type, but nonspecific responses were also found. Overall, we outline the main markers used to index auditory distraction, present their meaning for understanding underpinning mechanisms, and discuss implications and knowledge gaps that need to be filled to fully exploit psychophysiology for auditory distraction research.