论真实信义刑事案件中的公证员保护

Mokhamad Hussain Adillah
{"title":"论真实信义刑事案件中的公证员保护","authors":"Mokhamad Hussain Adillah","doi":"10.26532/ijlss.v3i1.33408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to find out and analyze the position of notaries in criminal cases related to the fiduciary deed they made and their legal protection. This study uses a sociological juridical approach. Data collection was carried out through interviews and literature study. Data analysis was carried out in a qualitative descriptive manner. This research shows that a notary in a criminal case related to a fiduciary deed he made can serve as a witness or perpetrator of a crime as stipulated in Article 35 of Act No. 42/1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees.participating in criminal acts (Article 55 of the Criminal Code), assisting perpetrators in committing crimes (Article 231 of the Criminal Code), making fake letters (Article 263 of the Criminal Code), providing false statements in authentic deeds (Article 266 of the Criminal Code), embezzlement (Article 372 of the Criminal Code), and fraud (Article 378 of the Criminal Code) which causes harm to other parties, the notary can be held criminally responsible.Legal protection for notaries in criminal cases related to the fiduciary deed he made namelyafter the issuance of the Constitutional Court decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012 namely the summons of a notary through the Notary Honorary Council according to Article 66 UUJN. In addition, notaries still receive protection from the rights and obligations of notary disobeying as referred to in Article 1909 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code and Article 322 of the Criminal Code.","PeriodicalId":499705,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law Society Services","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Protection on Notary in Criminal Cases Related to Authentic Fiduciary Deeds\",\"authors\":\"Mokhamad Hussain Adillah\",\"doi\":\"10.26532/ijlss.v3i1.33408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to find out and analyze the position of notaries in criminal cases related to the fiduciary deed they made and their legal protection. This study uses a sociological juridical approach. Data collection was carried out through interviews and literature study. Data analysis was carried out in a qualitative descriptive manner. This research shows that a notary in a criminal case related to a fiduciary deed he made can serve as a witness or perpetrator of a crime as stipulated in Article 35 of Act No. 42/1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees.participating in criminal acts (Article 55 of the Criminal Code), assisting perpetrators in committing crimes (Article 231 of the Criminal Code), making fake letters (Article 263 of the Criminal Code), providing false statements in authentic deeds (Article 266 of the Criminal Code), embezzlement (Article 372 of the Criminal Code), and fraud (Article 378 of the Criminal Code) which causes harm to other parties, the notary can be held criminally responsible.Legal protection for notaries in criminal cases related to the fiduciary deed he made namelyafter the issuance of the Constitutional Court decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012 namely the summons of a notary through the Notary Honorary Council according to Article 66 UUJN. In addition, notaries still receive protection from the rights and obligations of notary disobeying as referred to in Article 1909 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code and Article 322 of the Criminal Code.\",\"PeriodicalId\":499705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law Society Services\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law Society Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlss.v3i1.33408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law Society Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlss.v3i1.33408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在找出并分析公证员在刑事案件中的地位,以及公证员所立的信义契约及其法律保护。本研究采用了社会学和法学的方法。通过访谈和文献研究进行数据收集。数据分析以定性描述的方式进行。本研究表明,公证人在其所立的信义契约相关的刑事案件中,可以作为信义担保法第42/1999条第35条规定的证人或犯罪行为人。公证员参与犯罪(刑法第55条)、协助犯罪(刑法第231条)、伪造信件(刑法第263条)、在真实契约中提供虚假陈述(刑法第266条)、贪污(刑法第372条)、欺诈(刑法第378条)给他人造成损害的,可以追究刑事责任。在宪法法院第49/PUU-X/2012号决定发布后,即根据《联合国宪章》第66条通过公证人名誉理事会传唤公证人后,公证人在刑事案件中所作的信托契约的法律保护。此外,公证人仍然受到《民法典》第1909条第(3)款和《刑法》第322条所述的不服从公证人的权利和义务的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Protection on Notary in Criminal Cases Related to Authentic Fiduciary Deeds
This research aims to find out and analyze the position of notaries in criminal cases related to the fiduciary deed they made and their legal protection. This study uses a sociological juridical approach. Data collection was carried out through interviews and literature study. Data analysis was carried out in a qualitative descriptive manner. This research shows that a notary in a criminal case related to a fiduciary deed he made can serve as a witness or perpetrator of a crime as stipulated in Article 35 of Act No. 42/1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees.participating in criminal acts (Article 55 of the Criminal Code), assisting perpetrators in committing crimes (Article 231 of the Criminal Code), making fake letters (Article 263 of the Criminal Code), providing false statements in authentic deeds (Article 266 of the Criminal Code), embezzlement (Article 372 of the Criminal Code), and fraud (Article 378 of the Criminal Code) which causes harm to other parties, the notary can be held criminally responsible.Legal protection for notaries in criminal cases related to the fiduciary deed he made namelyafter the issuance of the Constitutional Court decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012 namely the summons of a notary through the Notary Honorary Council according to Article 66 UUJN. In addition, notaries still receive protection from the rights and obligations of notary disobeying as referred to in Article 1909 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code and Article 322 of the Criminal Code.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Protection on Notary in Criminal Cases Related to Authentic Fiduciary Deeds Notary Responsibilities Who Participated in the Certificate Embezzlement Crime Land Official Responsibilities for Custody of BPHTB Payments The Building a Legal Culture of Awareness in Nitikan Village, Magetan District The Validity of Nominee Agreement Made Before a Notary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1