船体叶片升力对快速船舶阻力的影响分析:直船体叶片

Nafiri Muhammad Kautsar, None I Ketut Suastika
{"title":"船体叶片升力对快速船舶阻力的影响分析:直船体叶片","authors":"Nafiri Muhammad Kautsar, None I Ketut Suastika","doi":"10.55981/wave.2023.926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In previous studies by Saputra, the use of straight Hull Vane® increased ship's resistance. Based on hypothesis, this was caused by lifting force from Hull Vane® being too large, so that ship experienced bow trim. To reduce bow trim, smaller Hull Vane® was made including Hull Vane® with AR = 8.5, AR = 22.9 and AR = 28.94 with speeds which were 11 knots (Fn = 0.34), 17 knots (Fn = 0.53), 20 knots (Fn = 0.62) and 26 knots (Fn = 0.8). From simulation results, it was found that use of a straight Hull Vane® in every aspect ratio variation on vessel was only effective at 11 knots speed which could reduce ship's resistance up to 17%. For speeds above 11 knots, increased in aspect ratio can reduce resistance but resistance on ships with straight Hull Vane® was still greater than on ships without Hull Vane® because lift force by Hull Vane® at ship stern was still too large, so the bow of ship was more submerged than ship without Hull Vane®. This caused value of the wetted surface area (WSA) and value of hydrodynamic pressure more increased than ships without Hull Vane®, so value of ship's resistance also increased.","PeriodicalId":263381,"journal":{"name":"Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of The Effect of Hull Vane Lifting Force on Fast Vessel Resistance: Straight Hull Vane\",\"authors\":\"Nafiri Muhammad Kautsar, None I Ketut Suastika\",\"doi\":\"10.55981/wave.2023.926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In previous studies by Saputra, the use of straight Hull Vane® increased ship's resistance. Based on hypothesis, this was caused by lifting force from Hull Vane® being too large, so that ship experienced bow trim. To reduce bow trim, smaller Hull Vane® was made including Hull Vane® with AR = 8.5, AR = 22.9 and AR = 28.94 with speeds which were 11 knots (Fn = 0.34), 17 knots (Fn = 0.53), 20 knots (Fn = 0.62) and 26 knots (Fn = 0.8). From simulation results, it was found that use of a straight Hull Vane® in every aspect ratio variation on vessel was only effective at 11 knots speed which could reduce ship's resistance up to 17%. For speeds above 11 knots, increased in aspect ratio can reduce resistance but resistance on ships with straight Hull Vane® was still greater than on ships without Hull Vane® because lift force by Hull Vane® at ship stern was still too large, so the bow of ship was more submerged than ship without Hull Vane®. This caused value of the wetted surface area (WSA) and value of hydrodynamic pressure more increased than ships without Hull Vane®, so value of ship's resistance also increased.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55981/wave.2023.926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55981/wave.2023.926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Saputra之前的研究中,使用直船体叶片®增加了船舶的阻力。根据假设,这是由于船体叶片®的升力太大,因此船舶经历了船头修剪。为了减少船首纵倾,我们制造了更小的船体风帆®,包括风帆®的AR = 8.5, AR = 22.9和AR = 28.94,航速分别为11节(Fn = 0.34), 17节(Fn = 0.53), 20节(Fn = 0.62)和26节(Fn = 0.8)。从仿真结果中可以发现,在船舶的所有展弦比变化中,使用直船体叶片®仅在11节航速下有效,可以减少船舶阻力高达17%。当航速在11节以上时,增大展弦比可以减小阻力,但由于船体导叶在船尾的升力仍然太大,船首比没有船体导叶的船阻力更大。这使得船体的湿表面积(WSA)和动水压力值比没有船体叶片的船舶增大,因此船舶的阻力值也随之增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of The Effect of Hull Vane Lifting Force on Fast Vessel Resistance: Straight Hull Vane
In previous studies by Saputra, the use of straight Hull Vane® increased ship's resistance. Based on hypothesis, this was caused by lifting force from Hull Vane® being too large, so that ship experienced bow trim. To reduce bow trim, smaller Hull Vane® was made including Hull Vane® with AR = 8.5, AR = 22.9 and AR = 28.94 with speeds which were 11 knots (Fn = 0.34), 17 knots (Fn = 0.53), 20 knots (Fn = 0.62) and 26 knots (Fn = 0.8). From simulation results, it was found that use of a straight Hull Vane® in every aspect ratio variation on vessel was only effective at 11 knots speed which could reduce ship's resistance up to 17%. For speeds above 11 knots, increased in aspect ratio can reduce resistance but resistance on ships with straight Hull Vane® was still greater than on ships without Hull Vane® because lift force by Hull Vane® at ship stern was still too large, so the bow of ship was more submerged than ship without Hull Vane®. This caused value of the wetted surface area (WSA) and value of hydrodynamic pressure more increased than ships without Hull Vane®, so value of ship's resistance also increased.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Study of The Fan Turbine Performance in Oscillating Water Column with Airflow System in Venturi Directional Analysis of The Effect of Hull Vane Lifting Force on Fast Vessel Resistance: Straight Hull Vane A Comprehensive Study of Wave Angels and their Influence on Sail Boats Stress Analysis of 91.5 Metre Coal Carrier Pontoon with Variations of Frame Distance Stability Study of Water Ambulance in East Kalimantan Inland Waterways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1