扩展到南北之外:芬兰市政当局在欧洲结构基金中的地方机构

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES European Planning Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1080/09654313.2023.2271522
Eeva-Kaisa Prokkola, Fredriika Jakola
{"title":"扩展到南北之外:芬兰市政当局在欧洲结构基金中的地方机构","authors":"Eeva-Kaisa Prokkola, Fredriika Jakola","doi":"10.1080/09654313.2023.2271522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIncreasing regional differentiation and discontent in Europe have directed critical attention to European territorial cohesion policy and the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Fund) mechanism. There is wide literature investigating macro-level processes of regional differentiation and cohesion as well as the efficiency of multi-level governance in the implementation of the funding mechanism. This study contributes to the existing multidisciplinary literature on cohesion policy and structural funds by extending an understanding of the ESI Funds system to a local agency perspective with a specific focus on Finnish municipalities and the programme period 2014–2020, characterized by austerity policies, regional discontent and disagreement between the ESI programme regions. The examination offers a new understanding of local agents and beneficiaries’ differential access in the ESI Funds, showing that the agency of municipalities in the ESI Funds is simultaneously enabled and constrained by the multilevel Structural Funds programme’s areas of specialization, national regional policies, partnerships and the local environment. The findings indicate that generating inclusive and equal possibilities for all municipalities would necessitate more attention to the allocation of ESI Funds within the programme regions, not just between them.KEYWORDS: Regional policystructural fundsmunicipalitiesagencyregional development AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions. Thanks are also due to Foundation for Municipal Development (KAKS) for supporting the research (2020-2021) and Hanna-Maija Toivanen for producing the map. The authors are grateful to all municipal agents who devoted their time to participate in the study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 The EURA database includes basic information about the ERDF and ESF projects (programme, amount of funding, main implementer, partners) that have been funded in each programming period and the role of different organizations in project activities, including lists of all ESI Funds projects implemented by the municipalities in the mainland Finland.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Foundation for Municipality Development (KAKS), Finland.","PeriodicalId":48292,"journal":{"name":"European Planning Studies","volume":"14 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scaling beyond north and south: local agency of Finnish municipalities in European structural funds\",\"authors\":\"Eeva-Kaisa Prokkola, Fredriika Jakola\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09654313.2023.2271522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTIncreasing regional differentiation and discontent in Europe have directed critical attention to European territorial cohesion policy and the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Fund) mechanism. There is wide literature investigating macro-level processes of regional differentiation and cohesion as well as the efficiency of multi-level governance in the implementation of the funding mechanism. This study contributes to the existing multidisciplinary literature on cohesion policy and structural funds by extending an understanding of the ESI Funds system to a local agency perspective with a specific focus on Finnish municipalities and the programme period 2014–2020, characterized by austerity policies, regional discontent and disagreement between the ESI programme regions. The examination offers a new understanding of local agents and beneficiaries’ differential access in the ESI Funds, showing that the agency of municipalities in the ESI Funds is simultaneously enabled and constrained by the multilevel Structural Funds programme’s areas of specialization, national regional policies, partnerships and the local environment. The findings indicate that generating inclusive and equal possibilities for all municipalities would necessitate more attention to the allocation of ESI Funds within the programme regions, not just between them.KEYWORDS: Regional policystructural fundsmunicipalitiesagencyregional development AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions. Thanks are also due to Foundation for Municipal Development (KAKS) for supporting the research (2020-2021) and Hanna-Maija Toivanen for producing the map. The authors are grateful to all municipal agents who devoted their time to participate in the study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 The EURA database includes basic information about the ERDF and ESF projects (programme, amount of funding, main implementer, partners) that have been funded in each programming period and the role of different organizations in project activities, including lists of all ESI Funds projects implemented by the municipalities in the mainland Finland.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Foundation for Municipality Development (KAKS), Finland.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Planning Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Planning Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2271522\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Planning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2271522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】欧洲日益加剧的地区分化和不满情绪使人们对欧洲领土凝聚力政策和欧洲结构与投资基金(ESI Fund)机制的关注日益增加。已有大量文献研究了区域分化和区域凝聚力的宏观过程,以及多层次治理在资金机制实施中的效率。本研究通过将对ESI基金系统的理解扩展到地方机构的角度,并特别关注芬兰市政当局和2014-2020年计划期间(以紧缩政策、地区不满和ESI计划地区之间的分歧为特征),为现有的关于凝聚力政策和结构性基金的多学科文献做出了贡献。该研究对ESI基金中的地方代理和受益人的不同准入提供了新的理解,表明ESI基金中的市政机构同时受到多层次结构基金计划的专业领域、国家区域政策、伙伴关系和当地环境的限制。调查结果表明,要为所有城市创造包容和平等的机会,就需要更多地关注ESI资金在方案区域内的分配,而不仅仅是在方案区域之间。关键词:区域政策结构基金城市机构区域发展致谢感谢两位匿名审稿人提出的建设性意见和建议。还要感谢市政发展基金会(KAKS)对研究(2020-2021)的支持,以及Hanna-Maija Toivanen制作的地图。作者感谢所有投入时间参与这项研究的市政代理人。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1 EURA数据库包括每个规划期获得资助的ERDF和ESF项目的基本信息(方案、资助金额、主要实施者、合作伙伴)以及不同组织在项目活动中的作用,包括芬兰大陆各城市实施的所有ESI基金项目清单。本研究得到了芬兰市政发展基金会(KAKS)的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scaling beyond north and south: local agency of Finnish municipalities in European structural funds
ABSTRACTIncreasing regional differentiation and discontent in Europe have directed critical attention to European territorial cohesion policy and the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Fund) mechanism. There is wide literature investigating macro-level processes of regional differentiation and cohesion as well as the efficiency of multi-level governance in the implementation of the funding mechanism. This study contributes to the existing multidisciplinary literature on cohesion policy and structural funds by extending an understanding of the ESI Funds system to a local agency perspective with a specific focus on Finnish municipalities and the programme period 2014–2020, characterized by austerity policies, regional discontent and disagreement between the ESI programme regions. The examination offers a new understanding of local agents and beneficiaries’ differential access in the ESI Funds, showing that the agency of municipalities in the ESI Funds is simultaneously enabled and constrained by the multilevel Structural Funds programme’s areas of specialization, national regional policies, partnerships and the local environment. The findings indicate that generating inclusive and equal possibilities for all municipalities would necessitate more attention to the allocation of ESI Funds within the programme regions, not just between them.KEYWORDS: Regional policystructural fundsmunicipalitiesagencyregional development AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions. Thanks are also due to Foundation for Municipal Development (KAKS) for supporting the research (2020-2021) and Hanna-Maija Toivanen for producing the map. The authors are grateful to all municipal agents who devoted their time to participate in the study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 The EURA database includes basic information about the ERDF and ESF projects (programme, amount of funding, main implementer, partners) that have been funded in each programming period and the role of different organizations in project activities, including lists of all ESI Funds projects implemented by the municipalities in the mainland Finland.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Foundation for Municipality Development (KAKS), Finland.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: European Planning Studies provides a forum for ideas and information about spatial development processes and policies in Europe. The journal publishes articles of a theoretical, empirical and policy-relevant nature and is particularly concerned to integrate knowledge of processes with practical policy proposals, implementation and evaluation. Articles of particular interest to the journal focus upon specific spatial development problems, as well as emerging explanations of new urban, regional, national or supranational developmental tendencies. Country-specific, region-specific or locality-specific issues are focused upon, although comparative analysis is of especial value.
期刊最新文献
Environmental acceptability of suburban sprawl around two differently sized Czech cities New collaborations and novel innovations: the role of regional brokerage and collaboration intensity Privatisations, FDI, and Greece’s regional economic recovery: an empirical study of perceptual view of investors Conceptualizing ‘green’ in urban and regional planning – the cases of Oslo and Helsinki What are the driving factors for implementing participatory budgeting? A case study from Czechia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1