气管切开脱管:传统方法与单阶段比较

Samba Siva R Bathula
{"title":"气管切开脱管:传统方法与单阶段比较","authors":"Samba Siva R Bathula","doi":"10.23880/ooaj-16000267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the predictive relationship between independent variables (age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stroke, heart disease, pychiatric history and seizures, and successful tracheostomy decannulation (TD) with either the traditional method or single-stage method. Study Design: Retrospective chart review of both in-patient and out-patient clinic charts between the periods of January 1, 2013 and July 31, 2020 at Detroit Medical Center for information related to TD. Methods: Inclusion criteria include any patient diagnosed with tracheostomy status over the age of 18 years with decannulation. Exclusion criteria included no information about tracheostomy decannulation, i.e. incomplete medical records. Tracheostomy patients who underwent traditional TD (with capping trial) were compared to those who underwent newer single-stage TD (without capping trial). Chi-square analysis, multinomial regression analysis and t tests were performed to assess if there was a significant difference in successful TD between traditional method versus single-stage method. Binary dependent variable and independent variable relationship were analyzed with multinomial regression analysis with p<0.05 indicate a statistical significance. Results: Only 93 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria after 115 patient charts review. Majority of subjects were males 57% (n=53) .Oldest patient age was 81 years (mean=54.08; SD= 11.449). 49 was the highest BMI (mean=28.2; SD=6.86). There was no statistically significant difference between mean in age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, COPD, stroke, heart disease, psychiatric history, and seizures. Conclusion: This study showed the age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, COPD, stroke, heart disease, psychiatric history, and seizures are not significant indicators for successful TD in either method.","PeriodicalId":471595,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology open access journal","volume":"175 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracheostomy Decannulation: Traditional Method vs Single Stage Comparison\",\"authors\":\"Samba Siva R Bathula\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/ooaj-16000267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the predictive relationship between independent variables (age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stroke, heart disease, pychiatric history and seizures, and successful tracheostomy decannulation (TD) with either the traditional method or single-stage method. Study Design: Retrospective chart review of both in-patient and out-patient clinic charts between the periods of January 1, 2013 and July 31, 2020 at Detroit Medical Center for information related to TD. Methods: Inclusion criteria include any patient diagnosed with tracheostomy status over the age of 18 years with decannulation. Exclusion criteria included no information about tracheostomy decannulation, i.e. incomplete medical records. Tracheostomy patients who underwent traditional TD (with capping trial) were compared to those who underwent newer single-stage TD (without capping trial). Chi-square analysis, multinomial regression analysis and t tests were performed to assess if there was a significant difference in successful TD between traditional method versus single-stage method. Binary dependent variable and independent variable relationship were analyzed with multinomial regression analysis with p<0.05 indicate a statistical significance. Results: Only 93 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria after 115 patient charts review. Majority of subjects were males 57% (n=53) .Oldest patient age was 81 years (mean=54.08; SD= 11.449). 49 was the highest BMI (mean=28.2; SD=6.86). There was no statistically significant difference between mean in age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, COPD, stroke, heart disease, psychiatric history, and seizures. Conclusion: This study showed the age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, COPD, stroke, heart disease, psychiatric history, and seizures are not significant indicators for successful TD in either method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":471595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology open access journal\",\"volume\":\"175 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology open access journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/ooaj-16000267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology open access journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/ooaj-16000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨年龄、性别、BMI、高血压、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、脑卒中、心脏病、精神病史、癫痫发作等自变量与传统方法或单阶段方法气管造口脱管(TD)成功的预测关系。研究设计:回顾性分析底特律医疗中心2013年1月1日至2020年7月31日期间的住院和门诊图表,以获取与TD相关的信息。方法:纳入标准包括任何诊断为气管造口术且年龄大于18岁的患者。排除标准包括没有气管切开术的信息,即不完整的医疗记录。气管造瘘患者接受传统的TD(有封顶试验)与接受新的单期TD(没有封顶试验)的患者进行比较。通过卡方分析、多项回归分析和t检验来评估传统方法与单阶段方法的TD成功率是否存在显著差异。二元因变量和自变量关系采用多项回归分析,p<, 0.05为有统计学意义。结果:对115例患者的病历进行回顾,只有93例符合纳入和排除标准。男性占57% (n=53),年龄最大81岁(平均54.08岁;SD = 11.449)。最高BMI为49(平均28.2;SD = 6.86)。在年龄、性别、BMI、高血压、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺病、中风、心脏病、精神病史和癫痫发作等方面,两组间的平均值无统计学差异。结论:年龄、性别、体重指数、高血压、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺病、中风、心脏病、精神病史和癫痫发作均不是两种方法成功进行TD的重要指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tracheostomy Decannulation: Traditional Method vs Single Stage Comparison
Objective: To evaluate the predictive relationship between independent variables (age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stroke, heart disease, pychiatric history and seizures, and successful tracheostomy decannulation (TD) with either the traditional method or single-stage method. Study Design: Retrospective chart review of both in-patient and out-patient clinic charts between the periods of January 1, 2013 and July 31, 2020 at Detroit Medical Center for information related to TD. Methods: Inclusion criteria include any patient diagnosed with tracheostomy status over the age of 18 years with decannulation. Exclusion criteria included no information about tracheostomy decannulation, i.e. incomplete medical records. Tracheostomy patients who underwent traditional TD (with capping trial) were compared to those who underwent newer single-stage TD (without capping trial). Chi-square analysis, multinomial regression analysis and t tests were performed to assess if there was a significant difference in successful TD between traditional method versus single-stage method. Binary dependent variable and independent variable relationship were analyzed with multinomial regression analysis with p<0.05 indicate a statistical significance. Results: Only 93 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria after 115 patient charts review. Majority of subjects were males 57% (n=53) .Oldest patient age was 81 years (mean=54.08; SD= 11.449). 49 was the highest BMI (mean=28.2; SD=6.86). There was no statistically significant difference between mean in age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, COPD, stroke, heart disease, psychiatric history, and seizures. Conclusion: This study showed the age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, COPD, stroke, heart disease, psychiatric history, and seizures are not significant indicators for successful TD in either method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral Cavity Acrochordon about a Case Amyloidosis in ENT Presentation of a Case A Report on Emerging Evidence and Implications of COVID-19 Related Tinnitus: Preliminary Survey Results A Curious Cluster of Cholesteatoma: A Family Study The Effect of Effortful Swallow with Progressive Resistance on Swallow Function in Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1