用FRAM分析过程事故中的组织缺口:以帝国糖厂爆炸为例(2008)

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety Progress Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1002/prs.12545
Josué Eduardo Maia França, Maria Inês Vaz, Brenda Rodrigues Coutinho, Luís Pina
{"title":"用FRAM分析过程事故中的组织缺口:以帝国糖厂爆炸为例(2008)","authors":"Josué Eduardo Maia França, Maria Inês Vaz, Brenda Rodrigues Coutinho, Luís Pina","doi":"10.1002/prs.12545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study presents a reanalysis of the Imperial Sugar refinery accident that occurred in February 2008, in Georgia, USA, using functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) and based on technical‐scientific materials and the official reports. This explosion was fueled by sugar dust in the packaging building of the refinery, causing 14 fatalities and injuring 38 workers. The purpose of this reanalysis is to seek factors and interactions that could not be well analyzed or evidenced using traditional accident investigation techniques, which are primally designed to analyze linear systems. This reanalysis with FRAM allowed us to perceive the influence of organizational elements, such as culture, in the accidental chain of the event, highlighting the need of a broader approach for accidents involving high‐tech process industries. In this sense, FRAM enabled a more comprehensive analysis of the complex functioning of process plants, for both normal operation and in emergency. It was noticed that the greater the complexity of work systems, the greater the interaction and variability between personnel, equipment, and systems, requiring analysis techniques and methodologies capable of recognizing the real complexities that take place in these sociotechnical systems, especially in high‐tech process plants, such as the sugar refinery in this case.","PeriodicalId":20680,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing organizational gaps in process accidents with <scp>FRAM</scp>: The case of the Imperial Sugar refinery explosion (2008)\",\"authors\":\"Josué Eduardo Maia França, Maria Inês Vaz, Brenda Rodrigues Coutinho, Luís Pina\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prs.12545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study presents a reanalysis of the Imperial Sugar refinery accident that occurred in February 2008, in Georgia, USA, using functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) and based on technical‐scientific materials and the official reports. This explosion was fueled by sugar dust in the packaging building of the refinery, causing 14 fatalities and injuring 38 workers. The purpose of this reanalysis is to seek factors and interactions that could not be well analyzed or evidenced using traditional accident investigation techniques, which are primally designed to analyze linear systems. This reanalysis with FRAM allowed us to perceive the influence of organizational elements, such as culture, in the accidental chain of the event, highlighting the need of a broader approach for accidents involving high‐tech process industries. In this sense, FRAM enabled a more comprehensive analysis of the complex functioning of process plants, for both normal operation and in emergency. It was noticed that the greater the complexity of work systems, the greater the interaction and variability between personnel, equipment, and systems, requiring analysis techniques and methodologies capable of recognizing the real complexities that take place in these sociotechnical systems, especially in high‐tech process plants, such as the sugar refinery in this case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety Progress\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12545\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究基于科技资料和官方报告,采用功能共振分析方法(FRAM)对2008年2月发生在美国乔治亚州的帝国糖厂事故进行了再分析。这次爆炸是由炼油厂包装楼的糖尘引起的,造成14人死亡,38名工人受伤。这种再分析的目的是寻找传统事故调查技术无法很好地分析或证明的因素和相互作用,这些技术最初设计用于分析线性系统。使用FRAM进行的重新分析使我们能够在事件的意外链中感知到组织因素(如文化)的影响,强调需要更广泛的方法来处理涉及高科技过程工业的事故。从这个意义上说,FRAM能够更全面地分析加工工厂的复杂功能,包括正常操作和紧急情况。人们注意到,工作系统的复杂性越大,人员、设备和系统之间的相互作用和可变性就越大,这就需要能够识别这些社会技术系统中发生的真正复杂性的分析技术和方法,特别是在高科技工艺工厂中,如本例中的制糖厂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzing organizational gaps in process accidents with FRAM: The case of the Imperial Sugar refinery explosion (2008)
Abstract This study presents a reanalysis of the Imperial Sugar refinery accident that occurred in February 2008, in Georgia, USA, using functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) and based on technical‐scientific materials and the official reports. This explosion was fueled by sugar dust in the packaging building of the refinery, causing 14 fatalities and injuring 38 workers. The purpose of this reanalysis is to seek factors and interactions that could not be well analyzed or evidenced using traditional accident investigation techniques, which are primally designed to analyze linear systems. This reanalysis with FRAM allowed us to perceive the influence of organizational elements, such as culture, in the accidental chain of the event, highlighting the need of a broader approach for accidents involving high‐tech process industries. In this sense, FRAM enabled a more comprehensive analysis of the complex functioning of process plants, for both normal operation and in emergency. It was noticed that the greater the complexity of work systems, the greater the interaction and variability between personnel, equipment, and systems, requiring analysis techniques and methodologies capable of recognizing the real complexities that take place in these sociotechnical systems, especially in high‐tech process plants, such as the sugar refinery in this case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety Progress
Process Safety Progress 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Process Safety Progress covers process safety for engineering professionals. It addresses such topics as incident investigations/case histories, hazardous chemicals management, hazardous leaks prevention, risk assessment, process hazards evaluation, industrial hygiene, fire and explosion analysis, preventive maintenance, vapor cloud dispersion, and regulatory compliance, training, education, and other areas in process safety and loss prevention, including emerging concerns like plant and/or process security. Papers from the annual Loss Prevention Symposium and other AIChE safety conferences are automatically considered for publication, but unsolicited papers, particularly those addressing process safety issues in emerging technologies and industries are encouraged and evaluated equally.
期刊最新文献
Numerical study of failure modes of hazardous material tanks exposed to fire accidents in the process industry So, you cannot vent: A deep dive into other explosion protection methods Risk and consequence analysis of ammonia storage units in a nuclear fuel cycle facility Diagnosing electrostatic problems and hazards in industrial processes: Case studies Numerical simulation study on propane gas leakage and diffusion law in slope terrain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1