发展-行为儿科临床样本中Tic筛查工具(MOVeIT)与专家临床医生评估的比较

Jennifer A. Vermilion, Rebecca H. Bitsko, Melissa L. Danielson, Kristen P. Bonifacio, Shannon L. Dean, Susan L. Hyman, Erika F. Augustine, Jonathan W. Mink, Peter E. Morrison, Amy E. Vierhile, Stephen B. Sulkes, Edwin van Wijngaarden, Heather R. Adams
{"title":"发展-行为儿科临床样本中Tic筛查工具(MOVeIT)与专家临床医生评估的比较","authors":"Jennifer A. Vermilion, Rebecca H. Bitsko, Melissa L. Danielson, Kristen P. Bonifacio, Shannon L. Dean, Susan L. Hyman, Erika F. Augustine, Jonathan W. Mink, Peter E. Morrison, Amy E. Vierhile, Stephen B. Sulkes, Edwin van Wijngaarden, Heather R. Adams","doi":"10.1080/23794925.2023.2272948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTYouth with intellectual and developmental disabilities typically have higher rates of tics and stereotypies compared to children with otherwise typical development. Differentiating between these two pediatric movement disorders can be challenging due to overlapping clinical features, but is relevant due to distinct treatment modalities. The current study evaluated sensitivity and specificity of a tic screening measure, the Motor or Vocal Inventory of Tics (MOVeIT) in a pediatric sample enriched for stereotypy and tics. Children (n = 199, age 2–15 years old) receiving care in a developmental-behavioral pediatrics clinic underwent a gold-standard diagnostic assessment by a tic expert; these evaluations were compared to the MOVeIT. The MOVeIT demonstrated good sensitivity (89.8%) and relatively lower specificity (57.1%) compared to tic expert for detecting tics in the overall sample. Specificity of the MOVeIT to identify tics improved to 75% when excluding children with co-occurring stereotypy. For children with tics and co-occurring stereotypy, sensitivity remained high (91.9%) but specificity was low (39.1%). The area under the curve (AUC) value to detect tics on the MOVeIT compared to the tic expert gold standard was significantly higher for children without stereotypy (AUC = 85.7%) than those with stereotypy (AUC = 64.3%, p < .01). Overall, the ability to detect tics was better in those without co-occurring stereotypy symptoms. Further work is needed to establish the utility of the MOVeIT in populations where there is a high likelihood of co-occurring tics and stereotypy and in general population settings. Accurate distinction between tics and stereotypy will guide choices for intervention and anticipatory guidance for families. AcknowledgmentsWe thank the children and their parents for participation in this study. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the clinical providers in the Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics clinic who engaged with the study: Lynn Cole, DNP; Jenniffer Herrera, MD; Angela Liberatore, NP; Lorna Patanella, NP; Jessica Reiffer, MD; Melissa Ryan, NP; Johanna Stump-Siembor, NP.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2272948Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by the Association of University Centers on Disabilities (AUCD) cooperative agreement which was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Grant award U38OT000140]. Dr. Mink received salary support from IDDRC [grant P50HD103536] for preparation of the manuscript.","PeriodicalId":72992,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","volume":"20 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of a Tic Screening Tool (MOVeIT) in Comparison to Expert Clinician Assessment in a Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics Clinic Sample\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer A. Vermilion, Rebecca H. Bitsko, Melissa L. Danielson, Kristen P. Bonifacio, Shannon L. Dean, Susan L. Hyman, Erika F. Augustine, Jonathan W. Mink, Peter E. Morrison, Amy E. Vierhile, Stephen B. Sulkes, Edwin van Wijngaarden, Heather R. Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23794925.2023.2272948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTYouth with intellectual and developmental disabilities typically have higher rates of tics and stereotypies compared to children with otherwise typical development. Differentiating between these two pediatric movement disorders can be challenging due to overlapping clinical features, but is relevant due to distinct treatment modalities. The current study evaluated sensitivity and specificity of a tic screening measure, the Motor or Vocal Inventory of Tics (MOVeIT) in a pediatric sample enriched for stereotypy and tics. Children (n = 199, age 2–15 years old) receiving care in a developmental-behavioral pediatrics clinic underwent a gold-standard diagnostic assessment by a tic expert; these evaluations were compared to the MOVeIT. The MOVeIT demonstrated good sensitivity (89.8%) and relatively lower specificity (57.1%) compared to tic expert for detecting tics in the overall sample. Specificity of the MOVeIT to identify tics improved to 75% when excluding children with co-occurring stereotypy. For children with tics and co-occurring stereotypy, sensitivity remained high (91.9%) but specificity was low (39.1%). The area under the curve (AUC) value to detect tics on the MOVeIT compared to the tic expert gold standard was significantly higher for children without stereotypy (AUC = 85.7%) than those with stereotypy (AUC = 64.3%, p < .01). Overall, the ability to detect tics was better in those without co-occurring stereotypy symptoms. Further work is needed to establish the utility of the MOVeIT in populations where there is a high likelihood of co-occurring tics and stereotypy and in general population settings. Accurate distinction between tics and stereotypy will guide choices for intervention and anticipatory guidance for families. AcknowledgmentsWe thank the children and their parents for participation in this study. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the clinical providers in the Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics clinic who engaged with the study: Lynn Cole, DNP; Jenniffer Herrera, MD; Angela Liberatore, NP; Lorna Patanella, NP; Jessica Reiffer, MD; Melissa Ryan, NP; Johanna Stump-Siembor, NP.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2272948Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by the Association of University Centers on Disabilities (AUCD) cooperative agreement which was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Grant award U38OT000140]. Dr. Mink received salary support from IDDRC [grant P50HD103536] for preparation of the manuscript.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2272948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2272948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要与其他方面发育正常的儿童相比,患有智力和发育障碍的青少年通常有更高的抽动和刻板印象发生率。由于重叠的临床特征,区分这两种儿童运动障碍可能具有挑战性,但由于不同的治疗方式,这是相关的。目前的研究评估了抽动症筛查措施的敏感性和特异性,抽动症的运动或声音量表(MOVeIT)在儿童样本中丰富的刻板印象和抽动症。在发育行为儿科诊所接受治疗的儿童(n = 199,年龄2-15岁)接受了抽搐专家的金标准诊断评估;这些评估与MOVeIT进行了比较。与抽动专家相比,MOVeIT在检测整体样本中的抽动方面表现出良好的灵敏度(89.8%)和相对较低的特异性(57.1%)。当排除同时发生刻板印象的儿童时,MOVeIT识别抽搐的特异性提高到75%。对于抽搐和同时发生刻板印象的儿童,敏感性仍然很高(91.9%),但特异性较低(39.1%)。在MOVeIT上检测抽动的曲线下面积(AUC)值与抽动专家金标准相比,无刻板印象儿童(AUC = 85.7%)显著高于有刻板印象儿童(AUC = 64.3%, p < 0.01)。总的来说,在没有共同出现刻板印象症状的患者中,检测抽动的能力更好。需要进一步的工作来确定MOVeIT在同时发生抽搐和刻板印象的可能性很高的人群中以及在一般人群环境中的效用。准确区分抽动症和刻板印象将指导干预的选择和对家庭的预期指导。感谢儿童及其家长参与本次研究。我们非常感谢参与这项研究的发育和行为儿科诊所的临床提供者的贡献:Lynn Cole, DNP;詹妮弗·埃雷拉,医学博士;Angela Liberatore, NP;洛娜·帕塔内拉,NP;医学博士杰西卡·赖弗;Melissa Ryan, NP;约翰娜·斯顿-森伯,NP。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由美国疾病控制与预防中心资助的大学残疾研究中心协会(AUCD)合作协议支持[Grant award U38OT000140]。Mink博士获得了IDDRC的工资支持[grant P50HD103536],用于准备稿件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of a Tic Screening Tool (MOVeIT) in Comparison to Expert Clinician Assessment in a Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics Clinic Sample
ABSTRACTYouth with intellectual and developmental disabilities typically have higher rates of tics and stereotypies compared to children with otherwise typical development. Differentiating between these two pediatric movement disorders can be challenging due to overlapping clinical features, but is relevant due to distinct treatment modalities. The current study evaluated sensitivity and specificity of a tic screening measure, the Motor or Vocal Inventory of Tics (MOVeIT) in a pediatric sample enriched for stereotypy and tics. Children (n = 199, age 2–15 years old) receiving care in a developmental-behavioral pediatrics clinic underwent a gold-standard diagnostic assessment by a tic expert; these evaluations were compared to the MOVeIT. The MOVeIT demonstrated good sensitivity (89.8%) and relatively lower specificity (57.1%) compared to tic expert for detecting tics in the overall sample. Specificity of the MOVeIT to identify tics improved to 75% when excluding children with co-occurring stereotypy. For children with tics and co-occurring stereotypy, sensitivity remained high (91.9%) but specificity was low (39.1%). The area under the curve (AUC) value to detect tics on the MOVeIT compared to the tic expert gold standard was significantly higher for children without stereotypy (AUC = 85.7%) than those with stereotypy (AUC = 64.3%, p < .01). Overall, the ability to detect tics was better in those without co-occurring stereotypy symptoms. Further work is needed to establish the utility of the MOVeIT in populations where there is a high likelihood of co-occurring tics and stereotypy and in general population settings. Accurate distinction between tics and stereotypy will guide choices for intervention and anticipatory guidance for families. AcknowledgmentsWe thank the children and their parents for participation in this study. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the clinical providers in the Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics clinic who engaged with the study: Lynn Cole, DNP; Jenniffer Herrera, MD; Angela Liberatore, NP; Lorna Patanella, NP; Jessica Reiffer, MD; Melissa Ryan, NP; Johanna Stump-Siembor, NP.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2272948Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by the Association of University Centers on Disabilities (AUCD) cooperative agreement which was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Grant award U38OT000140]. Dr. Mink received salary support from IDDRC [grant P50HD103536] for preparation of the manuscript.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anxiety and Depression Symptoms Improve in Partial Hospitalization Treatment for Adolescents with and without Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: Leveraging Measurement-Based Care and Electronic Health Record Data Collaborative Safety Planning with Youth during a Suicide-Related Emergency: Developmental and Family Considerations Outside the Clinic Door: How Neighborhood Sociodemographic Disadvantage is Associated with Community Therapist Secondary Traumatic Stress and Emotional Exhaustion Outside the Clinic Door: How Neighborhood Sociodemographic Disadvantage is Associated with Community Therapist Secondary Traumatic Stress and Emotional Exhaustion Open Trial of a Telehealth Adaptation of Team-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Pediatric Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1