非暴力传播框架下英国“宠物遗憾”新闻报道分析

IF 2.2 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journalism Practice Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1080/17512786.2023.2260784
Diana Garrisi
{"title":"非暴力传播框架下英国“宠物遗憾”新闻报道分析","authors":"Diana Garrisi","doi":"10.1080/17512786.2023.2260784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDrawing on the tenets of Nonviolent Communication (NVC), this paper presents a discourse analysis of UK news coverage regarding the phenomenon commonly referred to as “pet regret”. This is an informal expression coined by mainstream media to indicate feelings of remorse experienced by individuals who acquired a companion animal during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequently found themselves questioning their decision, leading some to consider relinquish or leaving without care their pet. This paper will discuss examples from newspapers that used a moralistic framework to depict pet owners by resorting to forms of value judgments woven into rhetorical and syntactic structures. The tone of these judgments reinforces a type of representation grounded on binary thinking, potentially encouraging classifications of people based on reductive notions of right and wrong.KEYWORDS: Pet regretnonviolent communicationcondensation symbolBritish pressCOVID-19value judgement AcknowledgementThe author would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their detailed and constructive feedback.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47909,"journal":{"name":"Journalism Practice","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing the News Coverage of “Pet Regret” in the UK Through the Framework of Nonviolent Communication\",\"authors\":\"Diana Garrisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17512786.2023.2260784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTDrawing on the tenets of Nonviolent Communication (NVC), this paper presents a discourse analysis of UK news coverage regarding the phenomenon commonly referred to as “pet regret”. This is an informal expression coined by mainstream media to indicate feelings of remorse experienced by individuals who acquired a companion animal during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequently found themselves questioning their decision, leading some to consider relinquish or leaving without care their pet. This paper will discuss examples from newspapers that used a moralistic framework to depict pet owners by resorting to forms of value judgments woven into rhetorical and syntactic structures. The tone of these judgments reinforces a type of representation grounded on binary thinking, potentially encouraging classifications of people based on reductive notions of right and wrong.KEYWORDS: Pet regretnonviolent communicationcondensation symbolBritish pressCOVID-19value judgement AcknowledgementThe author would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their detailed and constructive feedback.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journalism Practice\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journalism Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2260784\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2260784","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文借鉴非暴力传播的原则,对英国新闻报道中通常被称为“宠物后悔”的现象进行了话语分析。这是一个由主流媒体创造的非正式表达,指的是在COVID-19大流行期间获得伴侣动物的个人所经历的悔恨情绪,随后发现自己质疑自己的决定,导致一些人考虑放弃或不顾自己的宠物而离开。本文将讨论报纸上的例子,这些例子使用道德框架来描述宠物主人,通过诉诸于编织成修辞和句法结构的价值判断形式。这些判断的语气强化了一种基于二元思维的表征,潜在地鼓励了基于对与错的简化概念对人进行分类。关键词:宠物遗憾非暴力沟通凝聚符号英国出版社scovid -19价值判断感谢编辑和匿名审稿人提供的详细而有建设性的反馈。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysing the News Coverage of “Pet Regret” in the UK Through the Framework of Nonviolent Communication
ABSTRACTDrawing on the tenets of Nonviolent Communication (NVC), this paper presents a discourse analysis of UK news coverage regarding the phenomenon commonly referred to as “pet regret”. This is an informal expression coined by mainstream media to indicate feelings of remorse experienced by individuals who acquired a companion animal during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequently found themselves questioning their decision, leading some to consider relinquish or leaving without care their pet. This paper will discuss examples from newspapers that used a moralistic framework to depict pet owners by resorting to forms of value judgments woven into rhetorical and syntactic structures. The tone of these judgments reinforces a type of representation grounded on binary thinking, potentially encouraging classifications of people based on reductive notions of right and wrong.KEYWORDS: Pet regretnonviolent communicationcondensation symbolBritish pressCOVID-19value judgement AcknowledgementThe author would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their detailed and constructive feedback.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journalism Practice
Journalism Practice COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: ournalism Practice provides opportunities for reflective, critical and research-based studies focused on the professional practice of journalism. The emphasis on journalism practice does not imply any false or intellectually disabling disconnect between theory and practice, but simply an assertion that Journalism Practice’s primary concern is to analyse and explore issues of practice and professional relevance. Journalism Practice is an intellectually rigorous journal with all contributions being refereed anonymously by acknowledged international experts in the field. An intellectually lively, but professionally experienced, Editorial Board with a wide-ranging experience of journalism practice advises and supports the Editor. Journalism Practice is devoted to: the study and analysis of significant issues arising from journalism as a field of professional practice; relevant developments in journalism training and education, as well as the construction of a reflective curriculum for journalism; analysis of journalism practice across the distinctive but converging media platforms of magazines, newspapers, online, radio and television; and the provision of a public space for practice-led, scholarly contributions from journalists as well as academics. Journalism Practice’s ambitious scope includes: the history of journalism practice; the professional practice of journalism; journalism training and education; journalism practice and new technology; journalism practice and ethics; and journalism practice and policy.
期刊最新文献
Who Gets a Voice in Homelessness? A Content Analysis of Quotations Used by Journalists “A Mercenary, a Thug … not Even a Journalist”: The Stigmatization of News Workers in Mexico Journalists’ Perception of the Adoption of New Communication Technologies in the UAE’s Media Organizations Chinese Journalists’ Tactics for Reporting on Sexual Violence Against Women Institutionalization of Hate Speech as a Daily Media Practice: The Case of “Wiadomości” TVP1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1