{"title":"中国的数字治理:数字时代的争端解决与稳定维护","authors":"Jieren Hu, Xingmei Zhang","doi":"10.1080/10670564.2023.2261877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDrawing on intensive fieldwork conducted in China from 2019 to 2022, this article argues that the Chinese Communist Party is now widely applying a mode of digital governance to contain social grievances and strengthen social stability. Although digital technology itself does help facilitate dispute resolution and stability maintenance by more effectively defusing collective actions and preventing/settling social disputes, the political system and power structure under authoritarianism, to a larger extent, shapes and affects the operation and outcome of digital governance. Even though the party-state is committed to rule by law and promoting a digital governance ‘by law and policy’, the ‘state of exception’ is invoked when it has to rely on digital governance ‘beyond law and policy’ in order to serve the necessity of consolidating its political power and ruling base when social stability is threatened. However, this approach not only fails to construct an accountable state image but may also lead to counterproductive outcomes. The study of digital governance in China adds new elements to the explanation of the condition for a ‘state of exception’ under authoritarianism and also answers why the Chinese government tries to prevent and settle disputes while keeping creating them in the digital age.KEYWORDS: Digital governancedigital technologythe state of exceptiondispute resolutionstability maintenanceChina AcknowledgementThe authors are grateful for Askan Weidemann’s help in publishing this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Yongshun Cai, ‘Power Structure and Regime Resilience: Contentious Politics in China’, British Journal of Political Science 38(3) (2008), pp. 411–432.2 Jieren Hu and Ying Wu, ‘Source Governance of Social Disputes in China’, Critical Asian Studies 55(3) (2023), pp. 354–376; Huang-Chih Sung, ‘Can Online Courts Promote Access to Justice? A Case Study of the Internet Court in China’, Computer Law & Security Review 39 (2020), pp. 3–8; Straton Papagianneas, ‘Automation and Digitalization of Justice in China’s Smart Court Systems’, China Brief 21 (2021), pp. 14–20; Hengyao Han, ‘论中国的线上纠纷解决机制(ODR): “网上枫桥经验”的探索与发展’ (On China’s Online Dispute Resolution Mechanism (ODR): Exploration and Development of ‘Online Fengqiao’ Experience), Shoudu Shifandaxue Xuebao (Journal of Capital Normal University) 2 (2021), pp. 70–78.3 Jesper Schlæger and Matthias Stepan, ‘Exploring the Sustainability of E-government Innovation in China: A Comparative Case Study on 22 Prefectural-level Cities’ Websites’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 22(4) (2017), pp. 625–649; Jeffrey James, ‘The Smart Feature Phone Revolution in Developing Countries: Bringing the Internet to the Bottom of the Pyramid’, Information Society 36(4) (2020), pp. 226–235.4 Evelyn Ruppert, Engin Isin, and Didier Bigo, ‘Data Politics’, Big Data & Society 4(2) (2017), pp. 1–7.5 Dragu Tiberiu and Yonatan Lupu, ‘Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights’, International Organization 75 (2021), pp. 991–1017; Justin Sherman, ‘Digital Authoritarianism and Implications for US National Security’, The Cyber Defense Review 6(1) (2021), pp.107–118; Robert Menendez, The New Big Brother: China and Digital Authoritarianism (Washington D.C, U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2020).6 Charles Tilly, From Mobilization to Revolution (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1978); Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires (Chicago: University of Chicago, 2006); Francis Fukuyama, ‘States and Democracy’, Democratization 21(7) (2014), pp. 1326–1340.7 David J. Bulman and Kyle A. Jaros, ‘Localism in Retreat? Central-provincial Relations in the Xi Jinping Era’, Journal of Contemporary China 30(131) (2021), pp.697–716; Nele Noesselt, ‘A Presidential Signature Initiative: Xiong’an and Governance Modernization under Xi Jinping’, Journal of Contemporary China 29(126) (2020), pp. 838–852.8 Biao Huang and Jianxing Yu, ‘Leading Digital Technologies for Coproduction: The Case of “Visit Once” Administrative Service Reform in Zhejiang Province, China’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 24(3) (2019), pp. 513–532.9 Jane E. Fountain, Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change (Brookings Institution Press, 2004), pp.19–30.10 Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen (Stanford University Press, 1998), p. 9; Giorgio Agamben, State of Exception, trans. Kevin Attell (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), p. 2.11 Carl Schmitt, Dictatorship (Polity, 2013); Carl Schmitt, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, trans. George Schwab (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005); John McCormick, ‘The Dilemmas of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and Constitutional Emergency Powers’, in D. Dyzenhaus (ed.), Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998), p. 223.12 Michael McConkey, ‘Anarchy, Sovereignty, and the State of Exception: Schmitt’s Challenge’, The Independent Review 17(3) (2013): 415–428.13 Lorenzo Cotula, ‘The State of Exception and The Law of the Global Economy: A Conceptual and Empirico-legal Inquiry’, Transnational Legal Theory 8(4) (2017): 424–454; Patricia Owens, ‘Reclaiming “Bare Life”? Against Agamben on Refugees’, International Relations 23(4) (2009), pp. 567–582.14 Flora Sapio, Sovereign Power and the Law in China (Brill: 2020), pp. 20–23.15 Ibid., pp. 57–59.16 Benjamin Liebman, ‘Assessing China’s Legal Reforms’, Columbia Journal of Asian Law 23(1) (2009), pp.17–33; Taisu Zhang and Tom Ginsburg, ‘China’s Turn toward Law’, Virginia Journal of International Law 59(2) (2019), pp. 306–385.17 Hu and Wu, 2023.18 Yu Zeng and Yuqing Feng, ‘Politicized Adjudication Vis-à-vis Petitioners in Chinese Criminal Justice’, Journal of Contemporary China 31(137) (2022), pp. 740–755; Ethan Michelson, ‘Justice from above or below? Popular Strategies for Resolving Grievances in Rural China’, The China Quarterly 193 (2008), pp. 43–64; Kwai Hang Ng and Xin He, Embedded Courts: Judicial Decision-Making in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017); Dali L. Yang, ‘China’s Troubled Quest for Order: Leadership, Organization and the Contradictions of the Stability Maintenance Regime’, Journal of Contemporary China 26(103) (2017), pp. 35–53.19 Agamben, 2005, pp. 25–26.20 Ibid., p.50.21 Helen Margetts and Cosmina Dorobantu, ‘Rethink Government with AI’, Nature 568 (2019), pp.163–165.22 Nathan Gardels and Nicolas Berggruen, Renovating Democracy: Governing in the Age of Globalization and Digital Capitalism (University of California Press, 2019).23 Lilia Shevtsova, ‘The Authoritarian Resurgence: Forward to the Past in Russia’, Journal of Democracy 26(2) (2015), pp. 22–36.24 Erica Johnson and Beth Kolko, ‘E-government and Transparency in Authoritarian Regimes: Comparison of National- and City-level E-government Web Sites in Central Asia’, Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media 3 (2010), pp. 15–48; Rory Truex, ‘Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits’, Comparative Political Studies 50(3) (2017), pp. 329–361.25 Clay Shirky, ‘The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change’, Foreign Affairs 90 (2011), pp. 28–41.26 Marc Lynch, ‘After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State’, Perspectives on Politics 9 (2011), pp. 301–310.27 Daniela Stockmann and Mary E. Gallagher, ‘Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China’, Comparative Political Studies 44(4) (2011), pp. 436–467.28 Zeynep Tufekci and Christopher Wilson, ‘Social Media and The Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square’, Journal of Communication 62 (2012), pp. 363–379; Yongshun-Cai and Titi Zhou, ‘New Information Communication Technologies and Social Protest in China: Information as Common Knowledge’, Asian Survey 56(4) (2016), pp. 731–75329 Diana Fu, ‘Fragmented Control: Governing Contentious Labor Organizations in China’, Governance 30 (2017), pp. 445–462.30 Diana Fu and Greg Distelhorst, ‘Grassroots Participation and Repression under Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping’, The China Journal 79 (2018), pp. 100–122.31 Jieren Hu, ‘Grand Mediation in China: Mechanism and Application’, Asian Survey 51(6) (2011), pp.1065–1089; Jieren Hu and Lingjian Zeng, ‘Grand Mediation Mechanism and Legitimacy Enhancement in Contemporary China: The Guang’an Model’, Journal of Contemporary China 24(91) (2015), pp. 43–63.32 Carl F. Minzner, ‘Xinfang: An Alternative to Formal Chinese Legal Institutions’, Stanford Journal of International Law 42(1) (2006), pp. 103–179.33 Jieren Hu, Tong Wu, and Jingyan Fei, ‘Flexible Governance in China: Affective Care, Petition Disputes and Regime Legitimacy’, Asian Survey 58(4) (2018), pp. 679–703.34 Yanhua Deng and Kevin J. O’Brien, ‘Relational Repression in China: Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters’, The China Quarterly 215 (2013), pp. 533–552.35 Ruoting Zheng and Jieren Hu, ‘Outsourced Lawyers in China: Third Party Mediator and Their Selective Response in Dispute Resolution’, China Information 34(3) (2020), pp. 1–23; Lynette H. Ong, ‘Thugs and Outsourcing of State Repression in China’, The China Journal 80 (2018), pp. 1–17.36 ‘1989年: 邓小平提出“稳定压倒一切”’ (1989: Deng Xiaoping Put Forward ‘Stability Trumps All’), People’s Net, 24 September, 2009, accessed 2 June, 2023, http://www.ce.cn/xwzx/gnsz/szyw/200809/24/t20080924_16904281.shtml.37 Jesper Schlaeger, E-Government in China: Technology, Power and Local Government Reform (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013); Jesper Schlæger and Min Jian, ‘Official Microblogging and Social Management by Local Governments in China’, China Information 28(2) (2014), pp. 189–213; Federico Caprotti and Dong Liu, ‘Emerging Platform Urbanism in China: Reconfigurations of Data, Citizenship and Materialities’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151 (2019), DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.016; Jelena Große-Bley and Genea Kostka, ‘Big Data Dreams and Reality in Shenzhen: An Investigation of Smart City Implementation in China’, Big Data & Society 8(2) (2021), pp. 1–14.38 Hu and Wu, 2023.39 According to the statistics of the Chinese Smart Cities Forum, six provinces and 51 cities have included Smart Cities in their government work reports in China; of these, 36 are under new concentrated construction. See Pu Liu and Zhenghong Peng, ‘China’s Smart City Pilots: A Progress Report’, Computer 47(10) (2014), pp. 72–81.40 Jun Xia, ‘Linking ICTs to Rural Development: China’s Rural Information Policy’, Government Information Quarterly 27 (2010), pp. 187–195.41 Wenzhao Li, ‘超大城市的互动治理及其机制建构: 以北京市“接诉即办”改革为例’ (Interactive Governance of Megacities and Its Mechanism Construction: A Case Study of The Reform of ‘Handling Complaints As Soon As They Are Received’ in Beijing), Dianzi Zhengwu (E-government) 11 (2021): 12–21.42 ‘重庆全面推行“云长制”’’ (Chongqing Fully Implements the ‘Cloud Leader System’), 19 August, 2019, accessed 3 April, 2023, https://www.sohu.com/a/334702556_123753.43 Rob Kitchin and Martin Dodge, Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011); Virginia Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 2017); Stephen Graham, ‘Spaces of Surveillant Simulation: New Technologies, Digital Representations, and Material Geographies’, Environment & Planning D Society & Space 16(4) (1998), pp. 483–504; Stephen Graham, ‘Software-sorted Geographies’, Progress in Human Geography 29(5) (2005), pp. 562–580.44 Pierre Bourdieu, Language and Symbolic Power (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999); Judith Butler, Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge, 1997).45 Simon Marvin, Aidan While, Bei Chen, and Mateja Kovacic, ‘Urban AI in China: Social Control or Hyper-Capitalist Development in The Post-smart City?’ Frontiers in Sustainable Cities (2022), pp. 1–11.46 Claire Seungeun Lee, ‘Datafication, Dataveillance, and The Social Credit System as China’s New Normal’, Online Information Review 43(6) (2019), pp. 952–970; Jingyang Huang and Kellee S. Tsai, ‘Securing Authoritarian Capitalism in the Digital Age: The Political Economy of Surveillance in China’, The China Journal 88(1) (2022), pp. 1–28; Xu Xu, ‘To Repress or to Co-opt? Authoritarian Control in the Age of Digital Surveillance’, American Journal of Political Science 65(2) (2021), pp. 309–325.47 Dragu Tiberiu and Adam Przeworski, ‘Preventive Repression: Two Types of Moral Hazard’, American Political Science review 113 (1) (2019), pp. 77–87; Bruce J. Dickson, The Dictator’s Dilemma: The Chinese Communist Party’s Strategy for Survival (Oxford University Press, 2016).48 Ron Deibert, ‘Authoritarianism Goes Global: Cyberspace under Siege’, Journal of Democracy 26(3) (2015), pp. 64–78; Espen G. Rød and Nills B. Weidmann, ‘Empowering Activists or Autocrats? The Internet in Authoritarian Regimes’, Journal of Peace Research 52(3) (2015), pp. 338–351.49 Kenneth G. Lieberthal, ‘Introduction: The “Fragmented Authoritarianism” Model and Its Limitations’, in Kenneth G. Lieberthal and David M. Lampton (eds.), Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992), pp. 1–32.50 Zelin Xue, Yang Zheng and Jieren Hu, ‘Cross-departmental Collaboration within the Government in China: The Case of Shanghai’, China: An International Journal 20(1) (2022), pp. 73–92.51 This is most presented by Chinese veterans’ protest. In fact, this kind of collective disputes can hardly be prosecuted offline either, see Jieren Hu and Tong Wu, ‘Emotional Mobilization of Chinese Veterans: Collective Activism, Flexible Governance and Dispute Resolution’, Journal of Contemporary China 30(129) (2021), pp. 451–464.52 Liebman, 2009.53 Keith J. Hand, ‘Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China’, University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review 7(1) (2011), pp. 51–159; Yang Su and Xin He, ‘Street as Courtroom: State Accommodation of Labor Protest in South China’, Law and Society Review 44(1) (2010), pp. 157–184.54 Anthony Oberschall, ‘Opportunities and Framing in the Eastern Europe Revolts of 1989’, in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp.172–199.55 Shaoying Zhang and Derek McGhee, ‘State of Exception: The Examination of Anti-Corruption Practices’, in Shaoying Zhang and Derek McGhee, China’s Ethical Revolution and Regaining Legitimacy: Politics and Development of Contemporary China (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp. 109–134.56 Jacques Delisle, ‘States of Exception in An Exceptional State: Emergency Powers Law in China’, in Victor V. Ramraj and Arun K. Thiruvengadam (eds.) Emergency Powers in Asia: Exploring the Limits of Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp.342–390.57 Edward Schatz, ‘What Kind(s) of Ethnography Does Political Science Need?’ in Edward Schatz (ed.), Political ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to The Study of Power (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), pp. 303–318.58 Tiberiu and Lupu, 2021.59 ‘2015 年政府工作报告’ (2015 Government Work Report), 5 March, 2015, accessed 7 March, 2023, http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2015zfgzbg.htm.60 ‘中央经济工作会议举行 习近平李克强作重要讲话’ (Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang Delivers Important Speeches at the Central Economic Work Conference), 21 December, 2018, accessed 8 May, 2023, http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018–12/21/content_5350934.htm.61 ‘从“最多跑一次”到“最多跑一地”’ (From ‘Run at Most Once’ to ‘Run at Most One Place’), 29 July, 2019, accessed 3 August, 2023, http://legal.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0729/c42510–31260913.html.62 In January 2003, at the first session of the 10th Zhejiang Provincial People’s Congress, Xi Jinping, the secretary of the provincial party committee, proposed the construction of ‘digital Zhejiang’. And in December 2016, the economic work conference of the provincial Party committee put forward the concept and goal of ‘running once at most’, see Xin Yu, ‘数字浙江建设的历史回顾’ (Historical Review of Digital Zhejiang Construction), 2 July, 2021, accessed 3 March, 2023, https://www.zjds.org.cn/zhyj/37777.jhtml.63 Interview of Mr. Wang, the officer of the city police station in Y City in Zhejiang, 16 August, 2021.64 Designed by the authors.65 ‘最高人民法院关于深化人民法院司法体制综合配套改革第五个五年改革纲要(2019–2023)’ (The Fifth Five-year Reform Outline of the SPC on Deepening the Comprehensive Supporting Reform of the Judicial System of the Court (2019–2023)), 12 November, 2019, accessed 4 April, 2023, https://m.thepaper.cn/baijiahao_4950121.66 Around 48% of primary and middle school students participated in subject-related private tutoring in China and by December 2020, the number of online education users in China has reached 342 million, see ‘2021 年中国教育培训行业市场现状、竞争格局及发展趋势分析’ (Analysis on the Market Status, Competition Pattern and Development Trend of China’s Education and Training Industry in 2021), 23 October, 2022, accessed 4 November, 2022, http://www.265xx.com/w421/33731.html; also see Park et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2020.67 Maria Heimer, ‘The Cadre Responsibility System and the Changing Needs of the Party’, in Kjeld E. Brodsgaard and Yongnian Zheng (eds.) The Chinese Communist Party in Reform (New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 122–138.68 Yongshun Cai and Lin Zhu, ‘Disciplining Local Officials in China: The Case of Conflict Management’, The China Journal 70 (2013), pp. 98–119; Susan H. Whiting, ‘The Cadre Evaluation System at the Grassroots: The Paradox of Party Rule’, in Barry J. Naughton and Dali L. Yang (eds.) Holding China Together: Diversity and National Integration in the Post-Deng Era (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 101–119.69 Jason Wang, Chun Y. Ng and Robert H. Brook, ‘Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics, New Technology, and Proactive Testing’, The Journal of the American Medical Association 323(14) (2020): 1341–1342; also see ‘Mobile Giants Agree to Share Location Data with EU’, 25 March, 2020, accessed 8 June, 2023, https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/0325/1126396-mobile-giants-agreeto-share-location-data-with-eu/.70 ‘Origin of Health Code: 48 Hours from Scratch, 40 Days Nationwide’, 11 January, 2021, accessed 28 May, 2022, https://xw.qq.com/amphtml/20210111A0B1QN00.71 ‘2022 年河南健康码最新规则’ (Latest Rules for Henan Health Code in 2022), 6 April, 2022, accessed 5 August, 2023, http://zz.bendibao.com/news/202189/85233.shtm.72 Marcello Ienca and Effy Vayena, ‘On the Responsible Use of Digital Data to Tackle the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Nature Medicine 26 (2020), pp. 463–464.73 Guobin Yang, The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009); Yongnian Zheng, Technological Empowerment: The Internet, State, and Society in China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007); Stanley Rosen, ‘Is the Internet a Positive Force in the Development of Civil Society, A Public Sphere and Democratization in China?’ International Journal of Communication 4 (2010), pp. 509–516.74 Interview with Mr. Yu, Shanghai, 18 June, 2022.75 Engen Tham, ‘China Bank Protest Stopped by Health Codes Turning Red, Depositors Say’, Reuters, 16 June, 2022, accessed 22 May, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-bank-protest-stopped-by-health-codes-turning-red-depositors-say-2022-06-14/.76 Deng and O’Brien, 2013.77 ‘河南储户“被赋红码”事件始末’ (The Beginning and End of the ‘Red Code’ Event for Henan Depositors), 23 June, 2022, accessed 5 March, 2023, https://www.163.com/dy/article/HAIFTTOC05537IV7.html.78 Online interview with Mr. Zhang through telephone call, the senior judge of the criminal court at district level in Zhengzhou, Henan, 23 June, 2022.79 The officials who were punished included the Director and vice-Director of the Social Control Guidance Department of the COVID-19 Prevention and Control Headquarters, the Director of the Stability Maintenance Guidance Department of the Political and Legal Committee of the Zhengzhou Municipal Committee, and the Deputy General Manager of Zhengzhou Big data Development Co., Ltd. See, ‘河南通报“红码”事件: 多人被严肃处理’ (Henan Announces the ‘Red Code’ Incident: Multiple People Being Seriously Handled), 22 June, 2022, accessed 7 August, 2023, https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_18689017.80 Phoebe Zhang, ‘China Officials Who Abused Health Codes to Stop Bank Protests Punished’, South China Morning Post, 23 June, 2022, accessed 2 June, 2023, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3182742/china-officials-who-abused-health-codes-stop-bank-protests.81 See for example, some netizens commented on Zhihu (知乎), a popular online communication community in mainland China, that ‘the Chinese government has treated the people as fools’ (把老百姓当傻子糊弄), 23 June, 2022, accessed 8 August, 2023, https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/532897481.82 Interview with Mr. Zhang, Zhengzhou, 3 August, 2023.83 Rogier Creemers, ‘Cyber China: Upgrading Propaganda, Public Opinion Work and Social Management for the Twenty-First Century’, Journal of Contemporary China 26(103) (2017), pp. 85–100.84 Greg Austin, Cyber Policy in China (Cambridge: Polity, 2014).85 Fountain, 2004, pp.11–13.86 World Bank, World Bank Governance Indicators, 1996–2008 (Washington: World Bank, 2008); Jacques Delisle, ‘Traps, Gaps and Law: Prospects and Challenges for China’s Reforms’, in Randall Peerenboom (ed.), Is China Trapped in Transition? Implications for Future Reforms (Oxford: Oxford Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, 2007), pp. 2–3.87 Delisle, 2010, pp. 342–390.88 Andrew S. Hoffman, Bart Jacobs, Bernard V. Gastel, Hanna Schraffenberger, Tamar Sharon T, Berber Pas, ‘Towards a Seamful Ethics of Covid‑19 Contact Tracing Apps?’ Ethics and Information Technology 23(1) (2021), pp. 105–115.89 Suzanne E. Scoggins and Kevin J. O’Brien, ‘China’s Unhappy Police’, Asian Survey 56(2) (2016), pp. 229–242.90 Heinrich Meier, Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss, The Concept of the Political (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), p. 77; Agamben, 2005, p. 20.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Social Science Fund Project “Empirical Study on Civil Online Litigation” [22CFX065].","PeriodicalId":47894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary China","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Governance in China: Dispute Settlement and Stability Maintenance in the Digital Age\",\"authors\":\"Jieren Hu, Xingmei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10670564.2023.2261877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTDrawing on intensive fieldwork conducted in China from 2019 to 2022, this article argues that the Chinese Communist Party is now widely applying a mode of digital governance to contain social grievances and strengthen social stability. Although digital technology itself does help facilitate dispute resolution and stability maintenance by more effectively defusing collective actions and preventing/settling social disputes, the political system and power structure under authoritarianism, to a larger extent, shapes and affects the operation and outcome of digital governance. Even though the party-state is committed to rule by law and promoting a digital governance ‘by law and policy’, the ‘state of exception’ is invoked when it has to rely on digital governance ‘beyond law and policy’ in order to serve the necessity of consolidating its political power and ruling base when social stability is threatened. However, this approach not only fails to construct an accountable state image but may also lead to counterproductive outcomes. The study of digital governance in China adds new elements to the explanation of the condition for a ‘state of exception’ under authoritarianism and also answers why the Chinese government tries to prevent and settle disputes while keeping creating them in the digital age.KEYWORDS: Digital governancedigital technologythe state of exceptiondispute resolutionstability maintenanceChina AcknowledgementThe authors are grateful for Askan Weidemann’s help in publishing this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Yongshun Cai, ‘Power Structure and Regime Resilience: Contentious Politics in China’, British Journal of Political Science 38(3) (2008), pp. 411–432.2 Jieren Hu and Ying Wu, ‘Source Governance of Social Disputes in China’, Critical Asian Studies 55(3) (2023), pp. 354–376; Huang-Chih Sung, ‘Can Online Courts Promote Access to Justice? A Case Study of the Internet Court in China’, Computer Law & Security Review 39 (2020), pp. 3–8; Straton Papagianneas, ‘Automation and Digitalization of Justice in China’s Smart Court Systems’, China Brief 21 (2021), pp. 14–20; Hengyao Han, ‘论中国的线上纠纷解决机制(ODR): “网上枫桥经验”的探索与发展’ (On China’s Online Dispute Resolution Mechanism (ODR): Exploration and Development of ‘Online Fengqiao’ Experience), Shoudu Shifandaxue Xuebao (Journal of Capital Normal University) 2 (2021), pp. 70–78.3 Jesper Schlæger and Matthias Stepan, ‘Exploring the Sustainability of E-government Innovation in China: A Comparative Case Study on 22 Prefectural-level Cities’ Websites’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 22(4) (2017), pp. 625–649; Jeffrey James, ‘The Smart Feature Phone Revolution in Developing Countries: Bringing the Internet to the Bottom of the Pyramid’, Information Society 36(4) (2020), pp. 226–235.4 Evelyn Ruppert, Engin Isin, and Didier Bigo, ‘Data Politics’, Big Data & Society 4(2) (2017), pp. 1–7.5 Dragu Tiberiu and Yonatan Lupu, ‘Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights’, International Organization 75 (2021), pp. 991–1017; Justin Sherman, ‘Digital Authoritarianism and Implications for US National Security’, The Cyber Defense Review 6(1) (2021), pp.107–118; Robert Menendez, The New Big Brother: China and Digital Authoritarianism (Washington D.C, U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2020).6 Charles Tilly, From Mobilization to Revolution (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1978); Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires (Chicago: University of Chicago, 2006); Francis Fukuyama, ‘States and Democracy’, Democratization 21(7) (2014), pp. 1326–1340.7 David J. Bulman and Kyle A. Jaros, ‘Localism in Retreat? Central-provincial Relations in the Xi Jinping Era’, Journal of Contemporary China 30(131) (2021), pp.697–716; Nele Noesselt, ‘A Presidential Signature Initiative: Xiong’an and Governance Modernization under Xi Jinping’, Journal of Contemporary China 29(126) (2020), pp. 838–852.8 Biao Huang and Jianxing Yu, ‘Leading Digital Technologies for Coproduction: The Case of “Visit Once” Administrative Service Reform in Zhejiang Province, China’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 24(3) (2019), pp. 513–532.9 Jane E. Fountain, Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change (Brookings Institution Press, 2004), pp.19–30.10 Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen (Stanford University Press, 1998), p. 9; Giorgio Agamben, State of Exception, trans. Kevin Attell (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), p. 2.11 Carl Schmitt, Dictatorship (Polity, 2013); Carl Schmitt, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, trans. George Schwab (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005); John McCormick, ‘The Dilemmas of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and Constitutional Emergency Powers’, in D. Dyzenhaus (ed.), Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998), p. 223.12 Michael McConkey, ‘Anarchy, Sovereignty, and the State of Exception: Schmitt’s Challenge’, The Independent Review 17(3) (2013): 415–428.13 Lorenzo Cotula, ‘The State of Exception and The Law of the Global Economy: A Conceptual and Empirico-legal Inquiry’, Transnational Legal Theory 8(4) (2017): 424–454; Patricia Owens, ‘Reclaiming “Bare Life”? Against Agamben on Refugees’, International Relations 23(4) (2009), pp. 567–582.14 Flora Sapio, Sovereign Power and the Law in China (Brill: 2020), pp. 20–23.15 Ibid., pp. 57–59.16 Benjamin Liebman, ‘Assessing China’s Legal Reforms’, Columbia Journal of Asian Law 23(1) (2009), pp.17–33; Taisu Zhang and Tom Ginsburg, ‘China’s Turn toward Law’, Virginia Journal of International Law 59(2) (2019), pp. 306–385.17 Hu and Wu, 2023.18 Yu Zeng and Yuqing Feng, ‘Politicized Adjudication Vis-à-vis Petitioners in Chinese Criminal Justice’, Journal of Contemporary China 31(137) (2022), pp. 740–755; Ethan Michelson, ‘Justice from above or below? Popular Strategies for Resolving Grievances in Rural China’, The China Quarterly 193 (2008), pp. 43–64; Kwai Hang Ng and Xin He, Embedded Courts: Judicial Decision-Making in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017); Dali L. Yang, ‘China’s Troubled Quest for Order: Leadership, Organization and the Contradictions of the Stability Maintenance Regime’, Journal of Contemporary China 26(103) (2017), pp. 35–53.19 Agamben, 2005, pp. 25–26.20 Ibid., p.50.21 Helen Margetts and Cosmina Dorobantu, ‘Rethink Government with AI’, Nature 568 (2019), pp.163–165.22 Nathan Gardels and Nicolas Berggruen, Renovating Democracy: Governing in the Age of Globalization and Digital Capitalism (University of California Press, 2019).23 Lilia Shevtsova, ‘The Authoritarian Resurgence: Forward to the Past in Russia’, Journal of Democracy 26(2) (2015), pp. 22–36.24 Erica Johnson and Beth Kolko, ‘E-government and Transparency in Authoritarian Regimes: Comparison of National- and City-level E-government Web Sites in Central Asia’, Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media 3 (2010), pp. 15–48; Rory Truex, ‘Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits’, Comparative Political Studies 50(3) (2017), pp. 329–361.25 Clay Shirky, ‘The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change’, Foreign Affairs 90 (2011), pp. 28–41.26 Marc Lynch, ‘After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State’, Perspectives on Politics 9 (2011), pp. 301–310.27 Daniela Stockmann and Mary E. Gallagher, ‘Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China’, Comparative Political Studies 44(4) (2011), pp. 436–467.28 Zeynep Tufekci and Christopher Wilson, ‘Social Media and The Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square’, Journal of Communication 62 (2012), pp. 363–379; Yongshun-Cai and Titi Zhou, ‘New Information Communication Technologies and Social Protest in China: Information as Common Knowledge’, Asian Survey 56(4) (2016), pp. 731–75329 Diana Fu, ‘Fragmented Control: Governing Contentious Labor Organizations in China’, Governance 30 (2017), pp. 445–462.30 Diana Fu and Greg Distelhorst, ‘Grassroots Participation and Repression under Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping’, The China Journal 79 (2018), pp. 100–122.31 Jieren Hu, ‘Grand Mediation in China: Mechanism and Application’, Asian Survey 51(6) (2011), pp.1065–1089; Jieren Hu and Lingjian Zeng, ‘Grand Mediation Mechanism and Legitimacy Enhancement in Contemporary China: The Guang’an Model’, Journal of Contemporary China 24(91) (2015), pp. 43–63.32 Carl F. Minzner, ‘Xinfang: An Alternative to Formal Chinese Legal Institutions’, Stanford Journal of International Law 42(1) (2006), pp. 103–179.33 Jieren Hu, Tong Wu, and Jingyan Fei, ‘Flexible Governance in China: Affective Care, Petition Disputes and Regime Legitimacy’, Asian Survey 58(4) (2018), pp. 679–703.34 Yanhua Deng and Kevin J. O’Brien, ‘Relational Repression in China: Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters’, The China Quarterly 215 (2013), pp. 533–552.35 Ruoting Zheng and Jieren Hu, ‘Outsourced Lawyers in China: Third Party Mediator and Their Selective Response in Dispute Resolution’, China Information 34(3) (2020), pp. 1–23; Lynette H. Ong, ‘Thugs and Outsourcing of State Repression in China’, The China Journal 80 (2018), pp. 1–17.36 ‘1989年: 邓小平提出“稳定压倒一切”’ (1989: Deng Xiaoping Put Forward ‘Stability Trumps All’), People’s Net, 24 September, 2009, accessed 2 June, 2023, http://www.ce.cn/xwzx/gnsz/szyw/200809/24/t20080924_16904281.shtml.37 Jesper Schlaeger, E-Government in China: Technology, Power and Local Government Reform (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013); Jesper Schlæger and Min Jian, ‘Official Microblogging and Social Management by Local Governments in China’, China Information 28(2) (2014), pp. 189–213; Federico Caprotti and Dong Liu, ‘Emerging Platform Urbanism in China: Reconfigurations of Data, Citizenship and Materialities’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151 (2019), DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.016; Jelena Große-Bley and Genea Kostka, ‘Big Data Dreams and Reality in Shenzhen: An Investigation of Smart City Implementation in China’, Big Data & Society 8(2) (2021), pp. 1–14.38 Hu and Wu, 2023.39 According to the statistics of the Chinese Smart Cities Forum, six provinces and 51 cities have included Smart Cities in their government work reports in China; of these, 36 are under new concentrated construction. See Pu Liu and Zhenghong Peng, ‘China’s Smart City Pilots: A Progress Report’, Computer 47(10) (2014), pp. 72–81.40 Jun Xia, ‘Linking ICTs to Rural Development: China’s Rural Information Policy’, Government Information Quarterly 27 (2010), pp. 187–195.41 Wenzhao Li, ‘超大城市的互动治理及其机制建构: 以北京市“接诉即办”改革为例’ (Interactive Governance of Megacities and Its Mechanism Construction: A Case Study of The Reform of ‘Handling Complaints As Soon As They Are Received’ in Beijing), Dianzi Zhengwu (E-government) 11 (2021): 12–21.42 ‘重庆全面推行“云长制”’’ (Chongqing Fully Implements the ‘Cloud Leader System’), 19 August, 2019, accessed 3 April, 2023, https://www.sohu.com/a/334702556_123753.43 Rob Kitchin and Martin Dodge, Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011); Virginia Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 2017); Stephen Graham, ‘Spaces of Surveillant Simulation: New Technologies, Digital Representations, and Material Geographies’, Environment & Planning D Society & Space 16(4) (1998), pp. 483–504; Stephen Graham, ‘Software-sorted Geographies’, Progress in Human Geography 29(5) (2005), pp. 562–580.44 Pierre Bourdieu, Language and Symbolic Power (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999); Judith Butler, Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge, 1997).45 Simon Marvin, Aidan While, Bei Chen, and Mateja Kovacic, ‘Urban AI in China: Social Control or Hyper-Capitalist Development in The Post-smart City?’ Frontiers in Sustainable Cities (2022), pp. 1–11.46 Claire Seungeun Lee, ‘Datafication, Dataveillance, and The Social Credit System as China’s New Normal’, Online Information Review 43(6) (2019), pp. 952–970; Jingyang Huang and Kellee S. Tsai, ‘Securing Authoritarian Capitalism in the Digital Age: The Political Economy of Surveillance in China’, The China Journal 88(1) (2022), pp. 1–28; Xu Xu, ‘To Repress or to Co-opt? Authoritarian Control in the Age of Digital Surveillance’, American Journal of Political Science 65(2) (2021), pp. 309–325.47 Dragu Tiberiu and Adam Przeworski, ‘Preventive Repression: Two Types of Moral Hazard’, American Political Science review 113 (1) (2019), pp. 77–87; Bruce J. Dickson, The Dictator’s Dilemma: The Chinese Communist Party’s Strategy for Survival (Oxford University Press, 2016).48 Ron Deibert, ‘Authoritarianism Goes Global: Cyberspace under Siege’, Journal of Democracy 26(3) (2015), pp. 64–78; Espen G. Rød and Nills B. Weidmann, ‘Empowering Activists or Autocrats? The Internet in Authoritarian Regimes’, Journal of Peace Research 52(3) (2015), pp. 338–351.49 Kenneth G. Lieberthal, ‘Introduction: The “Fragmented Authoritarianism” Model and Its Limitations’, in Kenneth G. Lieberthal and David M. Lampton (eds.), Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992), pp. 1–32.50 Zelin Xue, Yang Zheng and Jieren Hu, ‘Cross-departmental Collaboration within the Government in China: The Case of Shanghai’, China: An International Journal 20(1) (2022), pp. 73–92.51 This is most presented by Chinese veterans’ protest. In fact, this kind of collective disputes can hardly be prosecuted offline either, see Jieren Hu and Tong Wu, ‘Emotional Mobilization of Chinese Veterans: Collective Activism, Flexible Governance and Dispute Resolution’, Journal of Contemporary China 30(129) (2021), pp. 451–464.52 Liebman, 2009.53 Keith J. Hand, ‘Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China’, University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review 7(1) (2011), pp. 51–159; Yang Su and Xin He, ‘Street as Courtroom: State Accommodation of Labor Protest in South China’, Law and Society Review 44(1) (2010), pp. 157–184.54 Anthony Oberschall, ‘Opportunities and Framing in the Eastern Europe Revolts of 1989’, in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp.172–199.55 Shaoying Zhang and Derek McGhee, ‘State of Exception: The Examination of Anti-Corruption Practices’, in Shaoying Zhang and Derek McGhee, China’s Ethical Revolution and Regaining Legitimacy: Politics and Development of Contemporary China (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp. 109–134.56 Jacques Delisle, ‘States of Exception in An Exceptional State: Emergency Powers Law in China’, in Victor V. Ramraj and Arun K. Thiruvengadam (eds.) Emergency Powers in Asia: Exploring the Limits of Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp.342–390.57 Edward Schatz, ‘What Kind(s) of Ethnography Does Political Science Need?’ in Edward Schatz (ed.), Political ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to The Study of Power (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), pp. 303–318.58 Tiberiu and Lupu, 2021.59 ‘2015 年政府工作报告’ (2015 Government Work Report), 5 March, 2015, accessed 7 March, 2023, http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2015zfgzbg.htm.60 ‘中央经济工作会议举行 习近平李克强作重要讲话’ (Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang Delivers Important Speeches at the Central Economic Work Conference), 21 December, 2018, accessed 8 May, 2023, http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018–12/21/content_5350934.htm.61 ‘从“最多跑一次”到“最多跑一地”’ (From ‘Run at Most Once’ to ‘Run at Most One Place’), 29 July, 2019, accessed 3 August, 2023, http://legal.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0729/c42510–31260913.html.62 In January 2003, at the first session of the 10th Zhejiang Provincial People’s Congress, Xi Jinping, the secretary of the provincial party committee, proposed the construction of ‘digital Zhejiang’. And in December 2016, the economic work conference of the provincial Party committee put forward the concept and goal of ‘running once at most’, see Xin Yu, ‘数字浙江建设的历史回顾’ (Historical Review of Digital Zhejiang Construction), 2 July, 2021, accessed 3 March, 2023, https://www.zjds.org.cn/zhyj/37777.jhtml.63 Interview of Mr. Wang, the officer of the city police station in Y City in Zhejiang, 16 August, 2021.64 Designed by the authors.65 ‘最高人民法院关于深化人民法院司法体制综合配套改革第五个五年改革纲要(2019–2023)’ (The Fifth Five-year Reform Outline of the SPC on Deepening the Comprehensive Supporting Reform of the Judicial System of the Court (2019–2023)), 12 November, 2019, accessed 4 April, 2023, https://m.thepaper.cn/baijiahao_4950121.66 Around 48% of primary and middle school students participated in subject-related private tutoring in China and by December 2020, the number of online education users in China has reached 342 million, see ‘2021 年中国教育培训行业市场现状、竞争格局及发展趋势分析’ (Analysis on the Market Status, Competition Pattern and Development Trend of China’s Education and Training Industry in 2021), 23 October, 2022, accessed 4 November, 2022, http://www.265xx.com/w421/33731.html; also see Park et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2020.67 Maria Heimer, ‘The Cadre Responsibility System and the Changing Needs of the Party’, in Kjeld E. Brodsgaard and Yongnian Zheng (eds.) The Chinese Communist Party in Reform (New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 122–138.68 Yongshun Cai and Lin Zhu, ‘Disciplining Local Officials in China: The Case of Conflict Management’, The China Journal 70 (2013), pp. 98–119; Susan H. Whiting, ‘The Cadre Evaluation System at the Grassroots: The Paradox of Party Rule’, in Barry J. Naughton and Dali L. Yang (eds.) Holding China Together: Diversity and National Integration in the Post-Deng Era (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 101–119.69 Jason Wang, Chun Y. Ng and Robert H. Brook, ‘Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics, New Technology, and Proactive Testing’, The Journal of the American Medical Association 323(14) (2020): 1341–1342; also see ‘Mobile Giants Agree to Share Location Data with EU’, 25 March, 2020, accessed 8 June, 2023, https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/0325/1126396-mobile-giants-agreeto-share-location-data-with-eu/.70 ‘Origin of Health Code: 48 Hours from Scratch, 40 Days Nationwide’, 11 January, 2021, accessed 28 May, 2022, https://xw.qq.com/amphtml/20210111A0B1QN00.71 ‘2022 年河南健康码最新规则’ (Latest Rules for Henan Health Code in 2022), 6 April, 2022, accessed 5 August, 2023, http://zz.bendibao.com/news/202189/85233.shtm.72 Marcello Ienca and Effy Vayena, ‘On the Responsible Use of Digital Data to Tackle the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Nature Medicine 26 (2020), pp. 463–464.73 Guobin Yang, The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009); Yongnian Zheng, Technological Empowerment: The Internet, State, and Society in China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007); Stanley Rosen, ‘Is the Internet a Positive Force in the Development of Civil Society, A Public Sphere and Democratization in China?’ International Journal of Communication 4 (2010), pp. 509–516.74 Interview with Mr. Yu, Shanghai, 18 June, 2022.75 Engen Tham, ‘China Bank Protest Stopped by Health Codes Turning Red, Depositors Say’, Reuters, 16 June, 2022, accessed 22 May, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-bank-protest-stopped-by-health-codes-turning-red-depositors-say-2022-06-14/.76 Deng and O’Brien, 2013.77 ‘河南储户“被赋红码”事件始末’ (The Beginning and End of the ‘Red Code’ Event for Henan Depositors), 23 June, 2022, accessed 5 March, 2023, https://www.163.com/dy/article/HAIFTTOC05537IV7.html.78 Online interview with Mr. Zhang through telephone call, the senior judge of the criminal court at district level in Zhengzhou, Henan, 23 June, 2022.79 The officials who were punished included the Director and vice-Director of the Social Control Guidance Department of the COVID-19 Prevention and Control Headquarters, the Director of the Stability Maintenance Guidance Department of the Political and Legal Committee of the Zhengzhou Municipal Committee, and the Deputy General Manager of Zhengzhou Big data Development Co., Ltd. See, ‘河南通报“红码”事件: 多人被严肃处理’ (Henan Announces the ‘Red Code’ Incident: Multiple People Being Seriously Handled), 22 June, 2022, accessed 7 August, 2023, https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_18689017.80 Phoebe Zhang, ‘China Officials Who Abused Health Codes to Stop Bank Protests Punished’, South China Morning Post, 23 June, 2022, accessed 2 June, 2023, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3182742/china-officials-who-abused-health-codes-stop-bank-protests.81 See for example, some netizens commented on Zhihu (知乎), a popular online communication community in mainland China, that ‘the Chinese government has treated the people as fools’ (把老百姓当傻子糊弄), 23 June, 2022, accessed 8 August, 2023, https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/532897481.82 Interview with Mr. Zhang, Zhengzhou, 3 August, 2023.83 Rogier Creemers, ‘Cyber China: Upgrading Propaganda, Public Opinion Work and Social Management for the Twenty-First Century’, Journal of Contemporary China 26(103) (2017), pp. 85–100.84 Greg Austin, Cyber Policy in China (Cambridge: Polity, 2014).85 Fountain, 2004, pp.11–13.86 World Bank, World Bank Governance Indicators, 1996–2008 (Washington: World Bank, 2008); Jacques Delisle, ‘Traps, Gaps and Law: Prospects and Challenges for China’s Reforms’, in Randall Peerenboom (ed.), Is China Trapped in Transition? Implications for Future Reforms (Oxford: Oxford Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, 2007), pp. 2–3.87 Delisle, 2010, pp. 342–390.88 Andrew S. Hoffman, Bart Jacobs, Bernard V. Gastel, Hanna Schraffenberger, Tamar Sharon T, Berber Pas, ‘Towards a Seamful Ethics of Covid‑19 Contact Tracing Apps?’ Ethics and Information Technology 23(1) (2021), pp. 105–115.89 Suzanne E. Scoggins and Kevin J. O’Brien, ‘China’s Unhappy Police’, Asian Survey 56(2) (2016), pp. 229–242.90 Heinrich Meier, Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss, The Concept of the Political (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), p. 77; Agamben, 2005, p. 20.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Social Science Fund Project “Empirical Study on Civil Online Litigation” [22CFX065].\",\"PeriodicalId\":47894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary China\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2023.2261877\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2023.2261877","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
12 Michael McConkey,“无政府状态、主权和例外状态:Schmitt的挑战”,《独立评论》17(3)(2013):415-428.13。Lorenzo Cotula,“例外状态与全球经济规律:概念和经验-法律探究”,《跨国法律理论》8(4)(2017):424-454;帕特里夏·欧文斯,《重拾“赤裸的生活”?》Flora Sapio:《中国的主权权力与法律》(Brill: 2020),第20-23.15页;同上,第57-59.16页;Benjamin Liebman:《评估中国的法律改革》,《哥伦比亚亚洲法学杂志》23(1)(2009),第17 - 33页;张太素、Tom Ginsburg,“中国向法律的转向”,弗吉尼亚国际法杂志59(2)(2019),第306-385.17胡、吴,2023.18曾宇、冯玉青,“政治化的裁决对-à-vis中国刑事司法中的上访者”,当代中国杂志31(137)(2022),第740-755页;伊森·迈克尔逊,《正义来自上还是下?》化解中国农村不满的普遍策略”,《中国季刊》(2008),第43-64页;吴桂航、何欣:《嵌入式法院:中国的司法决策》(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2017);杨dali L.,“中国对秩序的艰难追求:领导、组织和维稳制度的矛盾”,《当代中国杂志》26(103)(2017),第35-53.19页。Agamben, 2005,第25-26.20页。同上,第50.21页。Helen Margetts和Cosmina Dorobantu,“用人工智能重新思考政府”,《自然》568(2019),第163 - 165.22页。《全球化和数字资本主义时代的治理》(加州大学出版社,2019).23Erica Johnson和Beth Kolko,“专制政权中的电子政务和透明度:中亚国家和城市级电子政务网站的比较”,数字图标:俄罗斯、欧亚和中欧新媒体研究3(2010),第15-48页;Rory Truex,《协商威权主义及其局限性》,《比较政治研究》50(3)(2017),329-361.25,Clay Shirky,《社交媒体的政治力量:技术、公共领域和政治变革》,《外交事务》90(2011),第28-41.26页,Marc Lynch,《埃及之后:网络挑战威权阿拉伯国家的限制和前景》,《政治展望》9(2011),第301-310.27,Daniela Stockmann和Mary E. Gallagher,《远程控制》;Zeynep Tufekci和Christopher Wilson:“社交媒体与参与政治抗议的决定:来自解放广场的观察”,《传播杂志》2012年第62期,363-379页;机制与应用”,《亚洲研究》(2011),pp.1065-1089;胡杰人、曾令健,“当代中国的大调解机制与合法性提升:广安模式”,《当代中国学报》2015年第24期第91期,第43-63.32页。Carl F. Minzner,“新方:中国正式法律制度的一种选择”,《斯坦福国际法杂志》2006年第42期,第103-179.33页。邓燕华、Kevin J. O ' brien,“中国的关系压制:利用社会关系来遣散抗议者”,《中国季刊》215(2013),第533-552.35页。郑若亭、胡杰仁,“中国外包律师:第三方调解员及其在纠纷解决中的选择性反应”,《中国信息》34(3)(2020),第1-23页;《中国地方政府的官方微博与社会管理》,《中国信息》2014年第28期,第2页。 189 - 213;费德里科·卡普罗蒂,刘东,“中国新兴平台城市主义:数据、公民身份和物质的重构”,《技术预测与社会变革》151 (2019),DOI: 10.1016/j.t techfore.2019.06.016;Jelena Große-Bley和Genea Kostka,“深圳的大数据梦想与现实:中国智慧城市实施调查”,《大数据与社会》8(2)(2021),pp. 1-14.38 Hu和Wu, 2023.39据中国智慧城市论坛统计,中国已有6个省和51个城市将智慧城市纳入政府工作报告;其中36个正在集中新建。参见刘璞和彭正红,“中国智慧城市试点:进展报告”,计算机47(10)(2014),pp. 72-81.40夏军,“将信息通信技术与农村发展联系起来:中国农村信息政策”,政府信息季刊27 (2010),pp. 187-195.41李文钊,“超大城市的互动治理及其机制建设”。《北京“投诉一到即处理”改革案例研究》,《电子政务》11(2021):12-21.42,《重庆全面实施“云领导制度”》,2019年8月19日,2023年4月3日,https://www.sohu.com/a/334702556_123753.43 Rob Kitchin和Martin Dodge,《代码/空间:软件与日常生活》(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011);弗吉尼亚·尤班克斯,《自动化不平等:高科技工具如何塑造、监管和惩罚穷人》(纽约,纽约:圣马丁出版社,2017);Stephen Graham,“监视模拟的空间:新技术,数字表示和物质地理”,环境与规划D社会与空间16(4)(1998),第483-504页;Stephen Graham,“软件分类地理学”,人文地理进展29(5)(2005),第562-580.44页。Pierre Bourdieu,语言和符号力量(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999);朱迪思·巴特勒:《易激动的演讲:表演的政治》。伦敦:劳特利奇出版社,1997).45Simon Marvin, Aidan While, Bei Chen, Mateja Kovacic,《中国的城市人工智能:后智能城市中的社会控制或超资本主义发展?》Claire Seungeun Lee,“数据化、数据监控和社会信用体系作为中国的新常态”,《在线信息评论》43(6)(2019),第952-970页;黄景阳,蔡凯莉,“数字时代威权资本主义的安全保障:中国监控的政治经济学”,《中国杂志》88(1)(2022),第1 - 28页;徐徐:《压制还是拉拢?》“数字监控时代的威权控制”,《美国政治科学杂志》65(2)(2021),第309-325.47页。Dragu Tiberiu和Adam Przeworski,“预防性镇压:两种类型的道德风险”,《美国政治科学评论》113(1)(2019),第77-87页;布鲁斯·j·迪克森:《独裁者的困境:中国共产党的生存战略》(牛津大学出版社,2016),第48页Ron Deibert,“威权主义走向全球:网络空间被围攻”,《民主杂志》26(3)(2015),第64-78页;Espen G. Rød, Nills B. Weidmann,《授权活动家还是独裁者?》上海的案例”,中国:国际期刊20(1)(2022),pp. 73-92.51。事实上,这种集体纠纷也很难在线下被起诉,见胡杰仁、吴桐,“中国退伍军人的情感动员:集体行动主义、灵活治理与纠纷解决”,《当代中国杂志》30(129)(2021),第451-464.52页。Anthony Oberschall,“1989年东欧起义中的机遇与框架”,载于Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy和Mayer N. Zald(主编),《社会运动的比较视角》(剑桥大学出版社,1996),pp.172 - 199.55张绍英和Derek McGhee,“例外状态:《对反腐败实践的审视》,见张少英和德里克·麦吉:《中国的伦理革命与合法性的恢复:当代中国的政治与发展》(帕尔格雷夫·麦克米伦出版社,2017),第109-134页。 56 Jacques Delisle,“例外状态下的例外状态:中国的紧急权力法”,载于Victor V. Ramraj和Arun K. Thiruvengadam(编)。《亚洲的紧急权力:探索合法性的极限》(剑桥大学出版社,2010),第342 - 390.57页。爱德华·沙茨(Edward Schatz)主编的《政治人种学:沉浸对权力研究的贡献》(芝加哥:在2016年12月,省委经济工作会议提出的概念和目标运行一次最多,看到鑫玉,“数字浙江建设的历史回顾”(数字浙江建设的历史回顾),7月2日,2021年3月3日访问,2023年,https://www.zjds.org.cn/zhyj/37777.jhtml.63的采访王先生,市警察局的警官Y浙江城市,8月16日,2021.64由作者设计的。65年最高人民法院关于深化人民法院司法体制综合配套改革第五个五年改革纲要(2019 - 2023)”(第五个五年改革纲要的程控深化全面支持法院的司法体制改革(2019 - 2023)),11月12日,2019年4月访问,2023年,https://m.thepaper.cn/baijiahao_4950121.66大约48%的中小学生参加与主体相关的私人辅导在中国和到2020年12月,中国网络教育用户的数量已经达到3.42亿人,见《2021年中国教育培训行业市场现状、竞争格局及发展趋势分析》,2022年10月23日,访问2022年11月4日,http://www.265xx.com/w421/33731.html;也见Park et al., 2011;Maria Heimer,“干部责任制与党的不断变化的需求”,载于Kjeld E. Brodsgaard和郑永年(编)。蔡永顺、朱林:《中国地方官员纪律:冲突管理案例》,《中国学刊》2013年第70期,第98-119页;Susan H. Whiting,“基层干部评价体系:党的统治的悖论”,在Barry J. Naughton和Dali L. Yang(编)。Jason Wang, Chun Y. Ng和Robert H. Brook,“台湾应对COVID-19:大数据分析,新技术和主动测试”,《美国医学会杂志》323(14)(2020):1341-1342;另见《移动巨头同意与欧盟共享位置数据》,2020年3月25日,2023年6月8日访问,https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/0325/1126396-mobile-giants-agreeto-share-location-data-with-eu/.70。从头开始48小时,40天全国”,1月11日,2021年5月28日访问,2022年,https://xw.qq.com/amphtml/20210111A0B1QN00.71的2022年河南健康码最新规则”(2022年最新规则对河南健康代码),4月6日,2022年8月5日访问,2023年,http://zz.bendibao.com/news/202189/85233.shtm.72马Ienca和埃菲Vayena,“负责任地使用的数字数据处理COVID-19流行的自然医学26(2020),页463 - 464.73杨国宾,中国互联网的力量:公民行动在线(纽约:哥伦比亚大学出版社,2009);郑永年,《技术赋权:中国的互联网、国家和社会》(斯坦福,加州:斯坦福大学出版社,2007);罗森(Stanley Rosen):《互联网在中国公民社会、公共领域和民主化发展中的积极作用吗?》国际期刊的沟通4(2010),页509 - 516.74余先生的采访中,上海,6月18日,2022.75企业Tham,”中国银行抗议停止卫生规范变红,储户说”,路透社报道,6月16日,2022年5月22日访问,2023年,https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china -银行-抗议-停止-健康-编码-转-红色-储户说- 2022 - 06 - 14/.76邓和O ' brien, 2013.77的河南储户”被赋红码”事件始末”(“红色代码”的开始和结束事件为河南储户),6月23日,2022年,访问日期:2023年3月5日https://www.163.com/dy/article/HAIFTTOC05537IV7.html.78 河南省郑州市区级刑事法院高级法官张某于2022.79年6月23日通过电话表示,被处罚的官员包括:新冠肺炎疫情防控指挥部社会控制指导处处长、副处长,郑州市委政法委维稳指导处处长,郑州大数据发展有限公司副总经理。有限公司看,“河南通报“红码”事件:多人被严肃处理”(河南宣布“红色代码”事件:多人被严肃处理),2022年6月22日,2023年8月7日,https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_18689017.80张菲比,“滥用健康码阻止银行抗议的中国官员被惩罚”,南华早报,2022年6月23日,2023年6月2日,https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3182742/china-officials-who-abused-health-codes-stop-bank-protests.81“中国政府把人民当傻瓜”,2022年6月23日,访问2023年8月8日,https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/532897481.82对张先生的采访,郑州,2023年8月3日。“面向21世纪的宣传、舆论工作与社会管理升级”,《当代中国》26(103)(2017),pp. 85-100.84Fountain, 2004, pp.11-13.86 World Bank, World Bank Governance Indicators, 1996-2008 (Washington: World Bank, 2008);雅克•迪莱尔:“陷阱、缺口与法律:中国改革的前景与挑战”,载于兰德尔•皮尔恩布姆主编的《中国是否陷入了转型?》对未来改革的启示(牛津:牛津法律、司法和社会基金会,2007年),第2-3.87页,Delisle, 2010年,第342-390.88页,Andrew S. Hoffman, Bart Jacobs, Bernard V. Gastel, Hanna Schraffenberger, Tamar Sharon T, Berber Pas,“迈向Covid - 19接触者追踪应用程序的无缝伦理?《伦理与信息技术》23(1)(2021),第105-115.89页。Suzanne E. Scoggins和Kevin J. O ' brien,《中国不快乐的警察》,《亚洲调查》56(2)(2016),第229-242.90页。Heinrich Meier, Carl Schmitt和Leo Strauss,《政治的概念》(芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,2003),第77页;Agamben, 2005,第20页。本工作得到国家社科基金项目“民事网络诉讼实证研究”[22CFX065]的支持。
Digital Governance in China: Dispute Settlement and Stability Maintenance in the Digital Age
ABSTRACTDrawing on intensive fieldwork conducted in China from 2019 to 2022, this article argues that the Chinese Communist Party is now widely applying a mode of digital governance to contain social grievances and strengthen social stability. Although digital technology itself does help facilitate dispute resolution and stability maintenance by more effectively defusing collective actions and preventing/settling social disputes, the political system and power structure under authoritarianism, to a larger extent, shapes and affects the operation and outcome of digital governance. Even though the party-state is committed to rule by law and promoting a digital governance ‘by law and policy’, the ‘state of exception’ is invoked when it has to rely on digital governance ‘beyond law and policy’ in order to serve the necessity of consolidating its political power and ruling base when social stability is threatened. However, this approach not only fails to construct an accountable state image but may also lead to counterproductive outcomes. The study of digital governance in China adds new elements to the explanation of the condition for a ‘state of exception’ under authoritarianism and also answers why the Chinese government tries to prevent and settle disputes while keeping creating them in the digital age.KEYWORDS: Digital governancedigital technologythe state of exceptiondispute resolutionstability maintenanceChina AcknowledgementThe authors are grateful for Askan Weidemann’s help in publishing this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Yongshun Cai, ‘Power Structure and Regime Resilience: Contentious Politics in China’, British Journal of Political Science 38(3) (2008), pp. 411–432.2 Jieren Hu and Ying Wu, ‘Source Governance of Social Disputes in China’, Critical Asian Studies 55(3) (2023), pp. 354–376; Huang-Chih Sung, ‘Can Online Courts Promote Access to Justice? A Case Study of the Internet Court in China’, Computer Law & Security Review 39 (2020), pp. 3–8; Straton Papagianneas, ‘Automation and Digitalization of Justice in China’s Smart Court Systems’, China Brief 21 (2021), pp. 14–20; Hengyao Han, ‘论中国的线上纠纷解决机制(ODR): “网上枫桥经验”的探索与发展’ (On China’s Online Dispute Resolution Mechanism (ODR): Exploration and Development of ‘Online Fengqiao’ Experience), Shoudu Shifandaxue Xuebao (Journal of Capital Normal University) 2 (2021), pp. 70–78.3 Jesper Schlæger and Matthias Stepan, ‘Exploring the Sustainability of E-government Innovation in China: A Comparative Case Study on 22 Prefectural-level Cities’ Websites’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 22(4) (2017), pp. 625–649; Jeffrey James, ‘The Smart Feature Phone Revolution in Developing Countries: Bringing the Internet to the Bottom of the Pyramid’, Information Society 36(4) (2020), pp. 226–235.4 Evelyn Ruppert, Engin Isin, and Didier Bigo, ‘Data Politics’, Big Data & Society 4(2) (2017), pp. 1–7.5 Dragu Tiberiu and Yonatan Lupu, ‘Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights’, International Organization 75 (2021), pp. 991–1017; Justin Sherman, ‘Digital Authoritarianism and Implications for US National Security’, The Cyber Defense Review 6(1) (2021), pp.107–118; Robert Menendez, The New Big Brother: China and Digital Authoritarianism (Washington D.C, U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2020).6 Charles Tilly, From Mobilization to Revolution (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1978); Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires (Chicago: University of Chicago, 2006); Francis Fukuyama, ‘States and Democracy’, Democratization 21(7) (2014), pp. 1326–1340.7 David J. Bulman and Kyle A. Jaros, ‘Localism in Retreat? Central-provincial Relations in the Xi Jinping Era’, Journal of Contemporary China 30(131) (2021), pp.697–716; Nele Noesselt, ‘A Presidential Signature Initiative: Xiong’an and Governance Modernization under Xi Jinping’, Journal of Contemporary China 29(126) (2020), pp. 838–852.8 Biao Huang and Jianxing Yu, ‘Leading Digital Technologies for Coproduction: The Case of “Visit Once” Administrative Service Reform in Zhejiang Province, China’, Journal of Chinese Political Science 24(3) (2019), pp. 513–532.9 Jane E. Fountain, Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change (Brookings Institution Press, 2004), pp.19–30.10 Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen (Stanford University Press, 1998), p. 9; Giorgio Agamben, State of Exception, trans. Kevin Attell (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), p. 2.11 Carl Schmitt, Dictatorship (Polity, 2013); Carl Schmitt, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, trans. George Schwab (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005); John McCormick, ‘The Dilemmas of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and Constitutional Emergency Powers’, in D. Dyzenhaus (ed.), Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998), p. 223.12 Michael McConkey, ‘Anarchy, Sovereignty, and the State of Exception: Schmitt’s Challenge’, The Independent Review 17(3) (2013): 415–428.13 Lorenzo Cotula, ‘The State of Exception and The Law of the Global Economy: A Conceptual and Empirico-legal Inquiry’, Transnational Legal Theory 8(4) (2017): 424–454; Patricia Owens, ‘Reclaiming “Bare Life”? Against Agamben on Refugees’, International Relations 23(4) (2009), pp. 567–582.14 Flora Sapio, Sovereign Power and the Law in China (Brill: 2020), pp. 20–23.15 Ibid., pp. 57–59.16 Benjamin Liebman, ‘Assessing China’s Legal Reforms’, Columbia Journal of Asian Law 23(1) (2009), pp.17–33; Taisu Zhang and Tom Ginsburg, ‘China’s Turn toward Law’, Virginia Journal of International Law 59(2) (2019), pp. 306–385.17 Hu and Wu, 2023.18 Yu Zeng and Yuqing Feng, ‘Politicized Adjudication Vis-à-vis Petitioners in Chinese Criminal Justice’, Journal of Contemporary China 31(137) (2022), pp. 740–755; Ethan Michelson, ‘Justice from above or below? Popular Strategies for Resolving Grievances in Rural China’, The China Quarterly 193 (2008), pp. 43–64; Kwai Hang Ng and Xin He, Embedded Courts: Judicial Decision-Making in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017); Dali L. Yang, ‘China’s Troubled Quest for Order: Leadership, Organization and the Contradictions of the Stability Maintenance Regime’, Journal of Contemporary China 26(103) (2017), pp. 35–53.19 Agamben, 2005, pp. 25–26.20 Ibid., p.50.21 Helen Margetts and Cosmina Dorobantu, ‘Rethink Government with AI’, Nature 568 (2019), pp.163–165.22 Nathan Gardels and Nicolas Berggruen, Renovating Democracy: Governing in the Age of Globalization and Digital Capitalism (University of California Press, 2019).23 Lilia Shevtsova, ‘The Authoritarian Resurgence: Forward to the Past in Russia’, Journal of Democracy 26(2) (2015), pp. 22–36.24 Erica Johnson and Beth Kolko, ‘E-government and Transparency in Authoritarian Regimes: Comparison of National- and City-level E-government Web Sites in Central Asia’, Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media 3 (2010), pp. 15–48; Rory Truex, ‘Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits’, Comparative Political Studies 50(3) (2017), pp. 329–361.25 Clay Shirky, ‘The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change’, Foreign Affairs 90 (2011), pp. 28–41.26 Marc Lynch, ‘After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State’, Perspectives on Politics 9 (2011), pp. 301–310.27 Daniela Stockmann and Mary E. Gallagher, ‘Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China’, Comparative Political Studies 44(4) (2011), pp. 436–467.28 Zeynep Tufekci and Christopher Wilson, ‘Social Media and The Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square’, Journal of Communication 62 (2012), pp. 363–379; Yongshun-Cai and Titi Zhou, ‘New Information Communication Technologies and Social Protest in China: Information as Common Knowledge’, Asian Survey 56(4) (2016), pp. 731–75329 Diana Fu, ‘Fragmented Control: Governing Contentious Labor Organizations in China’, Governance 30 (2017), pp. 445–462.30 Diana Fu and Greg Distelhorst, ‘Grassroots Participation and Repression under Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping’, The China Journal 79 (2018), pp. 100–122.31 Jieren Hu, ‘Grand Mediation in China: Mechanism and Application’, Asian Survey 51(6) (2011), pp.1065–1089; Jieren Hu and Lingjian Zeng, ‘Grand Mediation Mechanism and Legitimacy Enhancement in Contemporary China: The Guang’an Model’, Journal of Contemporary China 24(91) (2015), pp. 43–63.32 Carl F. Minzner, ‘Xinfang: An Alternative to Formal Chinese Legal Institutions’, Stanford Journal of International Law 42(1) (2006), pp. 103–179.33 Jieren Hu, Tong Wu, and Jingyan Fei, ‘Flexible Governance in China: Affective Care, Petition Disputes and Regime Legitimacy’, Asian Survey 58(4) (2018), pp. 679–703.34 Yanhua Deng and Kevin J. O’Brien, ‘Relational Repression in China: Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters’, The China Quarterly 215 (2013), pp. 533–552.35 Ruoting Zheng and Jieren Hu, ‘Outsourced Lawyers in China: Third Party Mediator and Their Selective Response in Dispute Resolution’, China Information 34(3) (2020), pp. 1–23; Lynette H. Ong, ‘Thugs and Outsourcing of State Repression in China’, The China Journal 80 (2018), pp. 1–17.36 ‘1989年: 邓小平提出“稳定压倒一切”’ (1989: Deng Xiaoping Put Forward ‘Stability Trumps All’), People’s Net, 24 September, 2009, accessed 2 June, 2023, http://www.ce.cn/xwzx/gnsz/szyw/200809/24/t20080924_16904281.shtml.37 Jesper Schlaeger, E-Government in China: Technology, Power and Local Government Reform (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013); Jesper Schlæger and Min Jian, ‘Official Microblogging and Social Management by Local Governments in China’, China Information 28(2) (2014), pp. 189–213; Federico Caprotti and Dong Liu, ‘Emerging Platform Urbanism in China: Reconfigurations of Data, Citizenship and Materialities’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151 (2019), DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.016; Jelena Große-Bley and Genea Kostka, ‘Big Data Dreams and Reality in Shenzhen: An Investigation of Smart City Implementation in China’, Big Data & Society 8(2) (2021), pp. 1–14.38 Hu and Wu, 2023.39 According to the statistics of the Chinese Smart Cities Forum, six provinces and 51 cities have included Smart Cities in their government work reports in China; of these, 36 are under new concentrated construction. See Pu Liu and Zhenghong Peng, ‘China’s Smart City Pilots: A Progress Report’, Computer 47(10) (2014), pp. 72–81.40 Jun Xia, ‘Linking ICTs to Rural Development: China’s Rural Information Policy’, Government Information Quarterly 27 (2010), pp. 187–195.41 Wenzhao Li, ‘超大城市的互动治理及其机制建构: 以北京市“接诉即办”改革为例’ (Interactive Governance of Megacities and Its Mechanism Construction: A Case Study of The Reform of ‘Handling Complaints As Soon As They Are Received’ in Beijing), Dianzi Zhengwu (E-government) 11 (2021): 12–21.42 ‘重庆全面推行“云长制”’’ (Chongqing Fully Implements the ‘Cloud Leader System’), 19 August, 2019, accessed 3 April, 2023, https://www.sohu.com/a/334702556_123753.43 Rob Kitchin and Martin Dodge, Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011); Virginia Eubanks, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 2017); Stephen Graham, ‘Spaces of Surveillant Simulation: New Technologies, Digital Representations, and Material Geographies’, Environment & Planning D Society & Space 16(4) (1998), pp. 483–504; Stephen Graham, ‘Software-sorted Geographies’, Progress in Human Geography 29(5) (2005), pp. 562–580.44 Pierre Bourdieu, Language and Symbolic Power (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999); Judith Butler, Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge, 1997).45 Simon Marvin, Aidan While, Bei Chen, and Mateja Kovacic, ‘Urban AI in China: Social Control or Hyper-Capitalist Development in The Post-smart City?’ Frontiers in Sustainable Cities (2022), pp. 1–11.46 Claire Seungeun Lee, ‘Datafication, Dataveillance, and The Social Credit System as China’s New Normal’, Online Information Review 43(6) (2019), pp. 952–970; Jingyang Huang and Kellee S. Tsai, ‘Securing Authoritarian Capitalism in the Digital Age: The Political Economy of Surveillance in China’, The China Journal 88(1) (2022), pp. 1–28; Xu Xu, ‘To Repress or to Co-opt? Authoritarian Control in the Age of Digital Surveillance’, American Journal of Political Science 65(2) (2021), pp. 309–325.47 Dragu Tiberiu and Adam Przeworski, ‘Preventive Repression: Two Types of Moral Hazard’, American Political Science review 113 (1) (2019), pp. 77–87; Bruce J. Dickson, The Dictator’s Dilemma: The Chinese Communist Party’s Strategy for Survival (Oxford University Press, 2016).48 Ron Deibert, ‘Authoritarianism Goes Global: Cyberspace under Siege’, Journal of Democracy 26(3) (2015), pp. 64–78; Espen G. Rød and Nills B. Weidmann, ‘Empowering Activists or Autocrats? The Internet in Authoritarian Regimes’, Journal of Peace Research 52(3) (2015), pp. 338–351.49 Kenneth G. Lieberthal, ‘Introduction: The “Fragmented Authoritarianism” Model and Its Limitations’, in Kenneth G. Lieberthal and David M. Lampton (eds.), Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992), pp. 1–32.50 Zelin Xue, Yang Zheng and Jieren Hu, ‘Cross-departmental Collaboration within the Government in China: The Case of Shanghai’, China: An International Journal 20(1) (2022), pp. 73–92.51 This is most presented by Chinese veterans’ protest. In fact, this kind of collective disputes can hardly be prosecuted offline either, see Jieren Hu and Tong Wu, ‘Emotional Mobilization of Chinese Veterans: Collective Activism, Flexible Governance and Dispute Resolution’, Journal of Contemporary China 30(129) (2021), pp. 451–464.52 Liebman, 2009.53 Keith J. Hand, ‘Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China’, University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review 7(1) (2011), pp. 51–159; Yang Su and Xin He, ‘Street as Courtroom: State Accommodation of Labor Protest in South China’, Law and Society Review 44(1) (2010), pp. 157–184.54 Anthony Oberschall, ‘Opportunities and Framing in the Eastern Europe Revolts of 1989’, in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp.172–199.55 Shaoying Zhang and Derek McGhee, ‘State of Exception: The Examination of Anti-Corruption Practices’, in Shaoying Zhang and Derek McGhee, China’s Ethical Revolution and Regaining Legitimacy: Politics and Development of Contemporary China (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp. 109–134.56 Jacques Delisle, ‘States of Exception in An Exceptional State: Emergency Powers Law in China’, in Victor V. Ramraj and Arun K. Thiruvengadam (eds.) Emergency Powers in Asia: Exploring the Limits of Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp.342–390.57 Edward Schatz, ‘What Kind(s) of Ethnography Does Political Science Need?’ in Edward Schatz (ed.), Political ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to The Study of Power (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), pp. 303–318.58 Tiberiu and Lupu, 2021.59 ‘2015 年政府工作报告’ (2015 Government Work Report), 5 March, 2015, accessed 7 March, 2023, http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2015zfgzbg.htm.60 ‘中央经济工作会议举行 习近平李克强作重要讲话’ (Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang Delivers Important Speeches at the Central Economic Work Conference), 21 December, 2018, accessed 8 May, 2023, http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018–12/21/content_5350934.htm.61 ‘从“最多跑一次”到“最多跑一地”’ (From ‘Run at Most Once’ to ‘Run at Most One Place’), 29 July, 2019, accessed 3 August, 2023, http://legal.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0729/c42510–31260913.html.62 In January 2003, at the first session of the 10th Zhejiang Provincial People’s Congress, Xi Jinping, the secretary of the provincial party committee, proposed the construction of ‘digital Zhejiang’. And in December 2016, the economic work conference of the provincial Party committee put forward the concept and goal of ‘running once at most’, see Xin Yu, ‘数字浙江建设的历史回顾’ (Historical Review of Digital Zhejiang Construction), 2 July, 2021, accessed 3 March, 2023, https://www.zjds.org.cn/zhyj/37777.jhtml.63 Interview of Mr. Wang, the officer of the city police station in Y City in Zhejiang, 16 August, 2021.64 Designed by the authors.65 ‘最高人民法院关于深化人民法院司法体制综合配套改革第五个五年改革纲要(2019–2023)’ (The Fifth Five-year Reform Outline of the SPC on Deepening the Comprehensive Supporting Reform of the Judicial System of the Court (2019–2023)), 12 November, 2019, accessed 4 April, 2023, https://m.thepaper.cn/baijiahao_4950121.66 Around 48% of primary and middle school students participated in subject-related private tutoring in China and by December 2020, the number of online education users in China has reached 342 million, see ‘2021 年中国教育培训行业市场现状、竞争格局及发展趋势分析’ (Analysis on the Market Status, Competition Pattern and Development Trend of China’s Education and Training Industry in 2021), 23 October, 2022, accessed 4 November, 2022, http://www.265xx.com/w421/33731.html; also see Park et al., 2011; Guo et al., 2020.67 Maria Heimer, ‘The Cadre Responsibility System and the Changing Needs of the Party’, in Kjeld E. Brodsgaard and Yongnian Zheng (eds.) The Chinese Communist Party in Reform (New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 122–138.68 Yongshun Cai and Lin Zhu, ‘Disciplining Local Officials in China: The Case of Conflict Management’, The China Journal 70 (2013), pp. 98–119; Susan H. Whiting, ‘The Cadre Evaluation System at the Grassroots: The Paradox of Party Rule’, in Barry J. Naughton and Dali L. Yang (eds.) Holding China Together: Diversity and National Integration in the Post-Deng Era (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 101–119.69 Jason Wang, Chun Y. Ng and Robert H. Brook, ‘Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics, New Technology, and Proactive Testing’, The Journal of the American Medical Association 323(14) (2020): 1341–1342; also see ‘Mobile Giants Agree to Share Location Data with EU’, 25 March, 2020, accessed 8 June, 2023, https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/0325/1126396-mobile-giants-agreeto-share-location-data-with-eu/.70 ‘Origin of Health Code: 48 Hours from Scratch, 40 Days Nationwide’, 11 January, 2021, accessed 28 May, 2022, https://xw.qq.com/amphtml/20210111A0B1QN00.71 ‘2022 年河南健康码最新规则’ (Latest Rules for Henan Health Code in 2022), 6 April, 2022, accessed 5 August, 2023, http://zz.bendibao.com/news/202189/85233.shtm.72 Marcello Ienca and Effy Vayena, ‘On the Responsible Use of Digital Data to Tackle the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Nature Medicine 26 (2020), pp. 463–464.73 Guobin Yang, The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009); Yongnian Zheng, Technological Empowerment: The Internet, State, and Society in China (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007); Stanley Rosen, ‘Is the Internet a Positive Force in the Development of Civil Society, A Public Sphere and Democratization in China?’ International Journal of Communication 4 (2010), pp. 509–516.74 Interview with Mr. Yu, Shanghai, 18 June, 2022.75 Engen Tham, ‘China Bank Protest Stopped by Health Codes Turning Red, Depositors Say’, Reuters, 16 June, 2022, accessed 22 May, 2023, https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-bank-protest-stopped-by-health-codes-turning-red-depositors-say-2022-06-14/.76 Deng and O’Brien, 2013.77 ‘河南储户“被赋红码”事件始末’ (The Beginning and End of the ‘Red Code’ Event for Henan Depositors), 23 June, 2022, accessed 5 March, 2023, https://www.163.com/dy/article/HAIFTTOC05537IV7.html.78 Online interview with Mr. Zhang through telephone call, the senior judge of the criminal court at district level in Zhengzhou, Henan, 23 June, 2022.79 The officials who were punished included the Director and vice-Director of the Social Control Guidance Department of the COVID-19 Prevention and Control Headquarters, the Director of the Stability Maintenance Guidance Department of the Political and Legal Committee of the Zhengzhou Municipal Committee, and the Deputy General Manager of Zhengzhou Big data Development Co., Ltd. See, ‘河南通报“红码”事件: 多人被严肃处理’ (Henan Announces the ‘Red Code’ Incident: Multiple People Being Seriously Handled), 22 June, 2022, accessed 7 August, 2023, https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_18689017.80 Phoebe Zhang, ‘China Officials Who Abused Health Codes to Stop Bank Protests Punished’, South China Morning Post, 23 June, 2022, accessed 2 June, 2023, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3182742/china-officials-who-abused-health-codes-stop-bank-protests.81 See for example, some netizens commented on Zhihu (知乎), a popular online communication community in mainland China, that ‘the Chinese government has treated the people as fools’ (把老百姓当傻子糊弄), 23 June, 2022, accessed 8 August, 2023, https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/532897481.82 Interview with Mr. Zhang, Zhengzhou, 3 August, 2023.83 Rogier Creemers, ‘Cyber China: Upgrading Propaganda, Public Opinion Work and Social Management for the Twenty-First Century’, Journal of Contemporary China 26(103) (2017), pp. 85–100.84 Greg Austin, Cyber Policy in China (Cambridge: Polity, 2014).85 Fountain, 2004, pp.11–13.86 World Bank, World Bank Governance Indicators, 1996–2008 (Washington: World Bank, 2008); Jacques Delisle, ‘Traps, Gaps and Law: Prospects and Challenges for China’s Reforms’, in Randall Peerenboom (ed.), Is China Trapped in Transition? Implications for Future Reforms (Oxford: Oxford Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, 2007), pp. 2–3.87 Delisle, 2010, pp. 342–390.88 Andrew S. Hoffman, Bart Jacobs, Bernard V. Gastel, Hanna Schraffenberger, Tamar Sharon T, Berber Pas, ‘Towards a Seamful Ethics of Covid‑19 Contact Tracing Apps?’ Ethics and Information Technology 23(1) (2021), pp. 105–115.89 Suzanne E. Scoggins and Kevin J. O’Brien, ‘China’s Unhappy Police’, Asian Survey 56(2) (2016), pp. 229–242.90 Heinrich Meier, Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss, The Concept of the Political (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), p. 77; Agamben, 2005, p. 20.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Social Science Fund Project “Empirical Study on Civil Online Litigation” [22CFX065].
期刊介绍:
Journal of Contemporary China is the only English language journal edited in North America that provides exclusive information about contemporary Chinese affairs for scholars, businessmen and government policy-makers. It publishes articles of theoretical and policy research and research notes, as well as book reviews. The journal"s fields of interest include economics, political science, law, culture, literature, business, history, international relations, sociology and other social sciences and humanities.