农业生态学第一部分:木薯生产系统的成果

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1080/21683565.2023.2265318
Angelika Hilbeck, Eugenio Tisselli, Simon Crameri, Kallunde P. Sibuga, John Constantine, Mawazo J. Shitindi, Method Kilasara, Ayubu Churi, Camillius Sanga, Luambano Kihoma, Gladness Brush, Fadhili Stambuli, Rainard Mjunguli, Blaise Burnier, Janet Maro, Angelina Mbele, Suleyman Hamza, Mary Kissimbo, Ayoub Ndee
{"title":"农业生态学第一部分:木薯生产系统的成果","authors":"Angelika Hilbeck, Eugenio Tisselli, Simon Crameri, Kallunde P. Sibuga, John Constantine, Mawazo J. Shitindi, Method Kilasara, Ayubu Churi, Camillius Sanga, Luambano Kihoma, Gladness Brush, Fadhili Stambuli, Rainard Mjunguli, Blaise Burnier, Janet Maro, Angelina Mbele, Suleyman Hamza, Mary Kissimbo, Ayoub Ndee","doi":"10.1080/21683565.2023.2265318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses the results of a 5-year Agroecology Research and Advocacy project at three Tanzanian field sites in different agroecological zones. We investigated four common agroecological practices: compost application, mulching, intercropping, and biological pest control either alone or in combination. Two custom-built ICT tools – AgroEco Research (AER) and AgroEco Analysis (AEA) application – supported the field research. AER and AEA integration allowed secure data storage and real-time automated visualization and statistical analyses without programming. At no field station did legume intercropping or biological pest control increase cassava yields. The Chambezi field station had the highest yields even under untreated control conditions and only here, soil fertility amendments further increased root weights. Intercropping with cowpea legumes, alone or in combination with other practices, had no significant effect on cassava plant size or survival at the Mumbaka and Vianzi field sites and even negatively affected one or both parameters. Organic pest control had no effect on any target variable, except for plant size at Chambezi. Therefore, labor-intensive and expensive pest control practices may not be worth the investment at least when virus-resistant cassava varieties like Kiroba are used.","PeriodicalId":48958,"journal":{"name":"Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICT4Agroecology part I: Outcomes for cassava production system\",\"authors\":\"Angelika Hilbeck, Eugenio Tisselli, Simon Crameri, Kallunde P. Sibuga, John Constantine, Mawazo J. Shitindi, Method Kilasara, Ayubu Churi, Camillius Sanga, Luambano Kihoma, Gladness Brush, Fadhili Stambuli, Rainard Mjunguli, Blaise Burnier, Janet Maro, Angelina Mbele, Suleyman Hamza, Mary Kissimbo, Ayoub Ndee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21683565.2023.2265318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study discusses the results of a 5-year Agroecology Research and Advocacy project at three Tanzanian field sites in different agroecological zones. We investigated four common agroecological practices: compost application, mulching, intercropping, and biological pest control either alone or in combination. Two custom-built ICT tools – AgroEco Research (AER) and AgroEco Analysis (AEA) application – supported the field research. AER and AEA integration allowed secure data storage and real-time automated visualization and statistical analyses without programming. At no field station did legume intercropping or biological pest control increase cassava yields. The Chambezi field station had the highest yields even under untreated control conditions and only here, soil fertility amendments further increased root weights. Intercropping with cowpea legumes, alone or in combination with other practices, had no significant effect on cassava plant size or survival at the Mumbaka and Vianzi field sites and even negatively affected one or both parameters. Organic pest control had no effect on any target variable, except for plant size at Chambezi. Therefore, labor-intensive and expensive pest control practices may not be worth the investment at least when virus-resistant cassava varieties like Kiroba are used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2265318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2265318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究讨论了在坦桑尼亚不同农业生态区的三个实地进行的为期5年的农业生态学研究和宣传项目的结果。我们调查了四种常见的农业生态实践:堆肥施用、覆盖、间作和单独或组合的生物害虫防治。两个定制的ICT工具——AgroEco Research (AER)和AgroEco Analysis (AEA)应用——支持了实地研究。AER和AEA集成允许安全的数据存储和实时自动可视化和统计分析,而无需编程。豆科作物间作或生物虫害防治都没有提高木薯产量。Chambezi大田站即使在未经处理的对照条件下也有最高的产量,只有在这里,土壤肥力改良进一步增加了根重。在mumaka和Vianzi地区,单独间作豇豆和豆科作物或与其他方法联合间作对木薯的植株大小和成活率没有显著影响,甚至对其中一项或两项指标都有负面影响。除Chambezi的植株大小外,有机害虫防治对其他目标变量均无影响。因此,劳动密集型和昂贵的虫害防治措施可能不值得投资,至少在使用Kiroba等抗病毒木薯品种时是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ICT4Agroecology part I: Outcomes for cassava production system
This study discusses the results of a 5-year Agroecology Research and Advocacy project at three Tanzanian field sites in different agroecological zones. We investigated four common agroecological practices: compost application, mulching, intercropping, and biological pest control either alone or in combination. Two custom-built ICT tools – AgroEco Research (AER) and AgroEco Analysis (AEA) application – supported the field research. AER and AEA integration allowed secure data storage and real-time automated visualization and statistical analyses without programming. At no field station did legume intercropping or biological pest control increase cassava yields. The Chambezi field station had the highest yields even under untreated control conditions and only here, soil fertility amendments further increased root weights. Intercropping with cowpea legumes, alone or in combination with other practices, had no significant effect on cassava plant size or survival at the Mumbaka and Vianzi field sites and even negatively affected one or both parameters. Organic pest control had no effect on any target variable, except for plant size at Chambezi. Therefore, labor-intensive and expensive pest control practices may not be worth the investment at least when virus-resistant cassava varieties like Kiroba are used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems is devoted to the rapidly emerging fields of agroecology and food system sustainability. By linking scientific inquiry and productive practice with transformative social action, agroecology provides a foundation for developing the alternative food systems of the future. The journal focuses on the changes that need to occur in the design and management of our food systems in order to balance natural resource use and environmental protection with the needs of production, economic viability, food security, and the social well-being of all people. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems examines our current food systems from production to consumption, and the urgent need to transition to long-term sustainability. The journal promotes the study and application of agroecology for developing alternatives to the complex problems of resource depletion, environmental degradation, a narrowing of agrobiodiversity, continued world hunger, consolidation and industrialization of the food system, climate change, and the loss of farm land. The journal uses a food systems approach, and seeks experiences in agroecology that are on-farm, participatory, change-oriented, and backed by broad-based methodologies of sustainability analysis and evaluation.
期刊最新文献
Transdisciplinary and systemic construction of a framework for assessing the sustainability of alternative food networks in Mexico City Bio-cultural landscape and eco-friendly agriculture in Al-Arqoub, South Jerusalem, Palestine Doing agroecology in the belly of the beast The community contributions of urban farms in Singapore How to measure agroecology? A rapid appraisal approach based on focus group discussions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1