用感应激发热成像和磁粉检测技术自动检测锻件表面缺陷

Sergey Lugin, David Müller, Michael Finckbohner, Udo Netzelmann
{"title":"用感应激发热成像和磁粉检测技术自动检测锻件表面缺陷","authors":"Sergey Lugin, David Müller, Michael Finckbohner, Udo Netzelmann","doi":"10.1080/17686733.2023.2266901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inductively excited thermography has been shown to detect cracks in metallic components with good sensitivity. It is discussed as an alternative to magnetic particle testing. An open question to achieve acceptance in the industry is its testing reliability. A study with in total 200 forged steel parts was performed in order to compare the testing reliability of automated inductively thermographic testing and magnetic particle inspection. A robot supported thermographic inspection station was used. An inductor with orientation-independent crack detection was built up and tested. The thermographic phase images obtained were analysed by an automatic defect detection procedure based on machine learning techniques. Results of magnetic particle inspection served as a reference. Depending on the type of test object, an agreement of 68% to 82% was achieved, if only large indications of thermography were considered. The weak thermographic indications turned out to be due to shallow cracks (<150 µm depth). Improvement of the testing speed can be achieved by inspection inside large coils.","PeriodicalId":20889,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative InfraRed Thermography","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated surface defect detection in forged parts by inductively excited thermography and magnetic particle inspection\",\"authors\":\"Sergey Lugin, David Müller, Michael Finckbohner, Udo Netzelmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17686733.2023.2266901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inductively excited thermography has been shown to detect cracks in metallic components with good sensitivity. It is discussed as an alternative to magnetic particle testing. An open question to achieve acceptance in the industry is its testing reliability. A study with in total 200 forged steel parts was performed in order to compare the testing reliability of automated inductively thermographic testing and magnetic particle inspection. A robot supported thermographic inspection station was used. An inductor with orientation-independent crack detection was built up and tested. The thermographic phase images obtained were analysed by an automatic defect detection procedure based on machine learning techniques. Results of magnetic particle inspection served as a reference. Depending on the type of test object, an agreement of 68% to 82% was achieved, if only large indications of thermography were considered. The weak thermographic indications turned out to be due to shallow cracks (<150 µm depth). Improvement of the testing speed can be achieved by inspection inside large coils.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative InfraRed Thermography\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative InfraRed Thermography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17686733.2023.2266901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative InfraRed Thermography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17686733.2023.2266901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

感应激发热成像已被证明对金属构件的裂纹具有良好的灵敏度。讨论了它作为磁粉检测的替代方法。要获得业界的认可,一个悬而未决的问题是它的测试可靠性。为了比较自动感应热像检测和磁粉检测的可靠性,对200个锻件进行了试验研究。采用机器人支撑的热像检测站。建立了一种与取向无关的裂纹检测传感器,并对其进行了测试。通过基于机器学习技术的自动缺陷检测程序对获得的热像相图像进行分析。磁粉检测结果可作为参考。根据测试对象的类型,如果只考虑热成像的大迹象,则达到68%至82%的一致性。热像仪显示的微弱迹象是由于浅裂缝(<150µm深度)造成的。通过对大线圈内部进行检测,可以提高检测速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automated surface defect detection in forged parts by inductively excited thermography and magnetic particle inspection
Inductively excited thermography has been shown to detect cracks in metallic components with good sensitivity. It is discussed as an alternative to magnetic particle testing. An open question to achieve acceptance in the industry is its testing reliability. A study with in total 200 forged steel parts was performed in order to compare the testing reliability of automated inductively thermographic testing and magnetic particle inspection. A robot supported thermographic inspection station was used. An inductor with orientation-independent crack detection was built up and tested. The thermographic phase images obtained were analysed by an automatic defect detection procedure based on machine learning techniques. Results of magnetic particle inspection served as a reference. Depending on the type of test object, an agreement of 68% to 82% was achieved, if only large indications of thermography were considered. The weak thermographic indications turned out to be due to shallow cracks (<150 µm depth). Improvement of the testing speed can be achieved by inspection inside large coils.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated crack detection on metallic materials with flying-spot thermography using deep learning and progressive training Automated surface defect detection in forged parts by inductively excited thermography and magnetic particle inspection Finite element skin models as additional data for dynamic infrared thermography on skin lesions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1