转移性胰腺癌患者的初始旅程(PaCTO项目):葡萄牙专科医生的全国调查

IF 1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1159/000533178
Anabela G. Barros, Hélder Mansinho, Nuno Couto, Manuel R. Teixeira, Fernanda S. Tonin, Rudolfo Francisco, Filipa Duarte-Ramos
{"title":"转移性胰腺癌患者的初始旅程(PaCTO项目):葡萄牙专科医生的全国调查","authors":"Anabela G. Barros, Hélder Mansinho, Nuno Couto, Manuel R. Teixeira, Fernanda S. Tonin, Rudolfo Francisco, Filipa Duarte-Ramos","doi":"10.1159/000533178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We aimed to characterize the initial healthcare journey of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) patients in Portugal, including healthcare provision and factors affecting therapeutic decisions, namely BRCA mutations testing. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional, web-based survey using a convenience sampling approach. Portuguese oncologists and pathologists that routinely work with mPDAC patients from the different geographical regions and settings were invited to participate in the study via email (December 2020). Descriptive statistical analyses were performed, with categorical variables reported as absolute and relative frequencies, and continuous variables with non-normal distribution as median and interquartile range (IQR) (Stata v.15.0). Results: Seventy physicians participated in the study (43 oncologists, 27 pathologists). According to the responses, a median of 28 patients per center (IQR 12–70) was diagnosed with PDAC in the previous year; 22 of them referring (IQR 8–70) to mPDAC. The pointed median time from patients’ first hospital admission until disease diagnosis/staging is between 2 and 4 weeks. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle biopsy is available in most hospitals (86%). Around 50% of physicians request BRCA testing; the assessment of additional biomarkers besides BRCA is requested by 40% of professionals. Half of them stated that BRCA testing should be requested earlier–upon histological diagnosis, especially because the median time for results is of 4.0 weeks (IQR 4–8). PARP inhibitors such as olaparib, when available, would be the therapy of choice for most oncologists (71%) if no disease’ progression occurs after 4 months. Treatments’ selection is usually grounded on clinical criteria (e.g., performance status, liver function). Around 45% of patients use FOLFIRINOX/mFOLFIRINOX as the first-line therapy. Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel is used by 35% of patients as the second-line therapy. Conclusions: Physicians in Portugal support the increasing role of patient-tailored treatments in mPDAC, whose selection should be grounded on tumoral subtyping and molecular profiling. Further efforts to develop multidisciplinary teams, standardized clinical practice, and optimize the implementation of new target therapies are needed.","PeriodicalId":51838,"journal":{"name":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Initial Journey of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (PaCTO Project): A Nationwide Survey among Portuguese Specialist Physicians\",\"authors\":\"Anabela G. Barros, Hélder Mansinho, Nuno Couto, Manuel R. Teixeira, Fernanda S. Tonin, Rudolfo Francisco, Filipa Duarte-Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000533178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: We aimed to characterize the initial healthcare journey of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) patients in Portugal, including healthcare provision and factors affecting therapeutic decisions, namely BRCA mutations testing. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional, web-based survey using a convenience sampling approach. Portuguese oncologists and pathologists that routinely work with mPDAC patients from the different geographical regions and settings were invited to participate in the study via email (December 2020). Descriptive statistical analyses were performed, with categorical variables reported as absolute and relative frequencies, and continuous variables with non-normal distribution as median and interquartile range (IQR) (Stata v.15.0). Results: Seventy physicians participated in the study (43 oncologists, 27 pathologists). According to the responses, a median of 28 patients per center (IQR 12–70) was diagnosed with PDAC in the previous year; 22 of them referring (IQR 8–70) to mPDAC. The pointed median time from patients’ first hospital admission until disease diagnosis/staging is between 2 and 4 weeks. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle biopsy is available in most hospitals (86%). Around 50% of physicians request BRCA testing; the assessment of additional biomarkers besides BRCA is requested by 40% of professionals. Half of them stated that BRCA testing should be requested earlier–upon histological diagnosis, especially because the median time for results is of 4.0 weeks (IQR 4–8). PARP inhibitors such as olaparib, when available, would be the therapy of choice for most oncologists (71%) if no disease’ progression occurs after 4 months. Treatments’ selection is usually grounded on clinical criteria (e.g., performance status, liver function). Around 45% of patients use FOLFIRINOX/mFOLFIRINOX as the first-line therapy. Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel is used by 35% of patients as the second-line therapy. Conclusions: Physicians in Portugal support the increasing role of patient-tailored treatments in mPDAC, whose selection should be grounded on tumoral subtyping and molecular profiling. Further efforts to develop multidisciplinary teams, standardized clinical practice, and optimize the implementation of new target therapies are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

& lt; b> & lt; i>简介:& lt; / i> & lt; / b>我们旨在描述葡萄牙转移性胰腺导管腺癌(mPDAC)患者的初始医疗保健历程,包括医疗保健提供和影响治疗决策的因素,即BRCA突变检测。& lt; b> & lt; i>方法:& lt; / i> & lt; / b>这是一项基于网络的描述性横断面调查,采用方便的抽样方法。葡萄牙肿瘤学家和病理学家通常与来自不同地理区域和环境的mPDAC患者一起工作,他们被邀请通过电子邮件参与这项研究(2020年12月)。进行描述性统计分析,分类变量报告为绝对频率和相对频率,非正态分布的连续变量报告为中位数和四分位数范围(IQR) (Stata v.15.0)。& lt; b> & lt; i>结果:& lt; / i> & lt; / b>70名医生参与了这项研究(43名肿瘤学家,27名病理学家)。根据反馈,每个中心平均有28例患者(IQR 12-70)在前一年被诊断为PDAC;其中22个是指(IQR 8-70) mPDAC。从患者首次住院到疾病诊断/分期的中位时间在2至4周之间。大多数医院(86%)都有内镜超声细针活检。大约50%的医生要求进行BRCA检测;40%的专业人员要求对BRCA以外的其他生物标志物进行评估。其中一半的人表示,BRCA检测应在组织学诊断时尽早要求,特别是因为结果的中位时间为4.0周(IQR 4-8)。如果4个月后没有疾病进展,大多数肿瘤学家(71%)会选择PARP抑制剂,如奥拉帕尼。治疗方法的选择通常基于临床标准(例如,表现状态、肝功能)。约45%的患者使用FOLFIRINOX/mFOLFIRINOX作为一线治疗。35%的患者使用吉西他滨+ nab-紫杉醇作为二线治疗。& lt; b> & lt; i>结论:& lt; / i> & lt; / b>葡萄牙的医生支持在mPDAC中为患者量身定制治疗的作用越来越大,其选择应基于肿瘤亚型和分子谱。需要进一步努力发展多学科团队,规范临床实践,优化新靶向治疗的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Initial Journey of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (PaCTO Project): A Nationwide Survey among Portuguese Specialist Physicians
Introduction: We aimed to characterize the initial healthcare journey of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) patients in Portugal, including healthcare provision and factors affecting therapeutic decisions, namely BRCA mutations testing. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional, web-based survey using a convenience sampling approach. Portuguese oncologists and pathologists that routinely work with mPDAC patients from the different geographical regions and settings were invited to participate in the study via email (December 2020). Descriptive statistical analyses were performed, with categorical variables reported as absolute and relative frequencies, and continuous variables with non-normal distribution as median and interquartile range (IQR) (Stata v.15.0). Results: Seventy physicians participated in the study (43 oncologists, 27 pathologists). According to the responses, a median of 28 patients per center (IQR 12–70) was diagnosed with PDAC in the previous year; 22 of them referring (IQR 8–70) to mPDAC. The pointed median time from patients’ first hospital admission until disease diagnosis/staging is between 2 and 4 weeks. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle biopsy is available in most hospitals (86%). Around 50% of physicians request BRCA testing; the assessment of additional biomarkers besides BRCA is requested by 40% of professionals. Half of them stated that BRCA testing should be requested earlier–upon histological diagnosis, especially because the median time for results is of 4.0 weeks (IQR 4–8). PARP inhibitors such as olaparib, when available, would be the therapy of choice for most oncologists (71%) if no disease’ progression occurs after 4 months. Treatments’ selection is usually grounded on clinical criteria (e.g., performance status, liver function). Around 45% of patients use FOLFIRINOX/mFOLFIRINOX as the first-line therapy. Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel is used by 35% of patients as the second-line therapy. Conclusions: Physicians in Portugal support the increasing role of patient-tailored treatments in mPDAC, whose selection should be grounded on tumoral subtyping and molecular profiling. Further efforts to develop multidisciplinary teams, standardized clinical practice, and optimize the implementation of new target therapies are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology'' (formerly Jornal Português de Gastrenterologia), founded in 1994, is the official publication of Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia (Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology), Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (Portuguese Society of Digestive Endoscopy) and Associação Portuguesa para o Estudo do Fígado (Portuguese Association for the Study of the Liver). The journal publishes clinical and basic research articles on Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, Hepatology and related topics. Review articles, clinical case studies, images, letters to the editor and other articles such as recommendations or papers on gastroenterology clinical practice are also considered. Only articles written in English are accepted.
期刊最新文献
Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspectives on Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Staging, Associated Genetic Syndromes and Particularities of Their Clinical Approach. Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Gynecological Surgery: An Atypical Endoscopic Diagnosis. Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspectives on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided and Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Schwannoma of Common Bile Duct: A Clinico-Radiologic Diagnostic Quagmire – A Case Report Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Band Ligation of a Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1