“他们的家伴让我们分享”;工作人员把他们的狗带到英国监狱的康复价值

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Practice Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1108/jfp-08-2023-0039
Kirsten Wilson
{"title":"“他们的家伴让我们分享”;工作人员把他们的狗带到英国监狱的康复价值","authors":"Kirsten Wilson","doi":"10.1108/jfp-08-2023-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Whilst a growing body of support exists for the use of prison animal programmes (PAPs), research within UK prisons is sparse. Opportunity to add to this body of literature is also limited due to the practical barriers around safely embedding animals within forensic settings. This study aims to capitalise on an opportunity to explore a visitation model of a prison-based dog programme (PBDP), recently implemented within a UK prison. The intervention requires staff members to volunteer to bring their pets into the prison on a weekly basis and to accompany them as they complete their normal day-to-day prison roles. Design/methodology/approach Data was collected within a Category B adult prison for males convicted of a sexual offence. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with six prisoners who had spent time with the visitation dogs and six staff members who had been part of those interactions. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data, and three themes were developed that focused specifically on the value of this model of PBDP (staff members bringing their pets into the prison). Findings Three themes (reconnecting men to their outside lives; legitimising pro-social narrative; and “a safe space for them to open up”) were developed from participants’ lived experience of the intervention and its perceived value. Practical implications The potential for a low-level PAP to contribute to a rehabilitative prison culture was supported. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to explore the value of this particular model of PBDP within a UK prison.","PeriodicalId":44049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Their home companion for us to share”; the rehabilitative value of staff bringing their dogs into a UK prison\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jfp-08-2023-0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Whilst a growing body of support exists for the use of prison animal programmes (PAPs), research within UK prisons is sparse. Opportunity to add to this body of literature is also limited due to the practical barriers around safely embedding animals within forensic settings. This study aims to capitalise on an opportunity to explore a visitation model of a prison-based dog programme (PBDP), recently implemented within a UK prison. The intervention requires staff members to volunteer to bring their pets into the prison on a weekly basis and to accompany them as they complete their normal day-to-day prison roles. Design/methodology/approach Data was collected within a Category B adult prison for males convicted of a sexual offence. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with six prisoners who had spent time with the visitation dogs and six staff members who had been part of those interactions. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data, and three themes were developed that focused specifically on the value of this model of PBDP (staff members bringing their pets into the prison). Findings Three themes (reconnecting men to their outside lives; legitimising pro-social narrative; and “a safe space for them to open up”) were developed from participants’ lived experience of the intervention and its perceived value. Practical implications The potential for a low-level PAP to contribute to a rehabilitative prison culture was supported. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to explore the value of this particular model of PBDP within a UK prison.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-08-2023-0039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-08-2023-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然越来越多的人支持使用监狱动物计划(pap),但在英国监狱内的研究却很少。由于在法医环境中安全植入动物的实际障碍,增加这一文献的机会也很有限。本研究的目的是利用一个机会来探索基于监狱的狗项目(PBDP)的探访模式,该项目最近在英国监狱内实施。这项干预措施要求工作人员自愿每周将他们的宠物带到监狱,并在它们完成日常监狱任务时陪伴它们。设计/方法/方法数据是在一所B类成人监狱内收集的,该监狱关押的是被判有性犯罪的男性。对六名与探视犬相处过的囚犯和六名参与这些互动的工作人员进行了半结构化访谈。使用反身性专题分析来分析数据,并制定了三个专题,专门侧重于PBDP模式(工作人员将宠物带入监狱)的价值。三个主题(重新连接男性与他们的外部生活;使亲社会叙事合法化;和“一个让他们敞开心扉的安全空间”)是从参与者对干预的生活经历及其感知价值中发展出来的。实际影响委员会支持基层人民行动小组对监狱康复文化作出贡献的潜力。据作者所知,这是第一个在英国监狱中探索PBDP这种特殊模式的价值的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Their home companion for us to share”; the rehabilitative value of staff bringing their dogs into a UK prison
Purpose Whilst a growing body of support exists for the use of prison animal programmes (PAPs), research within UK prisons is sparse. Opportunity to add to this body of literature is also limited due to the practical barriers around safely embedding animals within forensic settings. This study aims to capitalise on an opportunity to explore a visitation model of a prison-based dog programme (PBDP), recently implemented within a UK prison. The intervention requires staff members to volunteer to bring their pets into the prison on a weekly basis and to accompany them as they complete their normal day-to-day prison roles. Design/methodology/approach Data was collected within a Category B adult prison for males convicted of a sexual offence. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with six prisoners who had spent time with the visitation dogs and six staff members who had been part of those interactions. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data, and three themes were developed that focused specifically on the value of this model of PBDP (staff members bringing their pets into the prison). Findings Three themes (reconnecting men to their outside lives; legitimising pro-social narrative; and “a safe space for them to open up”) were developed from participants’ lived experience of the intervention and its perceived value. Practical implications The potential for a low-level PAP to contribute to a rehabilitative prison culture was supported. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to explore the value of this particular model of PBDP within a UK prison.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Forensic Practice
Journal of Forensic Practice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Two studies evaluating the Stoicism programme at a foreign national prison A preliminary exploration of using the power threat meaning framework with individuals currently serving IPP sentences in custody Enough is enough: treatment dropout predictors of adolescents with harmful sexual behaviors in a New Zealand community sample Are indeterminate sentenced prisoners prepared for open prison? Practical implications/applications of an exploratory study in an English open prison Exploring the impact of custodial parkrun in an English women’s prison: HMPPS psychologists and partners delivering a best practice evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1