阿达木单抗生物仿制药ABP 501在炎症性肠病患者的长期治疗中同样有效和安全,当用作首次生物治疗或因非医学原因替代ADA原药时

Giammarco Mocci, Arianna Cingolani, Giorgia Orrù, Carla Felice, Francesca Maria Onidi, Gianmarco Lombardi, Davide Checchin, Raffaele Colucci, Laurino Grossi, Antonio Ferronato, Chiara Rocchi, Marta Ascolani, Paolo Usai Satta, Lucia Fanini, Stefano Pilati, Antonio Tursi
{"title":"阿达木单抗生物仿制药ABP 501在炎症性肠病患者的长期治疗中同样有效和安全,当用作首次生物治疗或因非医学原因替代ADA原药时","authors":"Giammarco Mocci, Arianna Cingolani, Giorgia Orrù, Carla Felice, Francesca Maria Onidi, Gianmarco Lombardi, Davide Checchin, Raffaele Colucci, Laurino Grossi, Antonio Ferronato, Chiara Rocchi, Marta Ascolani, Paolo Usai Satta, Lucia Fanini, Stefano Pilati, Antonio Tursi","doi":"10.3389/fgstr.2023.1218228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Biosimilars represent a new opportunity for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment and economic sustainability of therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of the adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 in biologic-naïve vs. biologic-switched IBD patients. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted using a database of patients with IBD treated with ABP 501, biologic-naïve or switched from the original, at eight IBD centers. We included adult patients with at least one year of follow-up. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy (persistence) and safety (adverse event rate) of ABP 501 therapy. Results A total of 118 patients with IBD were included in the analysis: 84 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) (39 women, 45 men, mean age 40.4 ± 14.3 years; 33% biologic-naïve) and 34 patients with ulcerative Colitis (UC) (16 women, 18 men, mean age 38.9 ± 14.9 years; 61.8% biologic-naïve). Regarding the primary endpoint, no difference was observed in the efficacy between biologic-naïve patients and patients with Adalimumab (ADA) originator replacement for non-medical reasons in terms of long-term persistence. However, ABP 501 showed a higher percentage of sustained clinical remission at 2 years in patients with CD (64 patients, 77%) than in those with UC (15 patients, 45.5%; p=0.00091). Nine patients (six with CD and three with UC) experienced adverse events that led to drug discontinuation in three. Conclusions APB 501 showed a good safety and efficacy profile in maintaining clinical response at 2 years in patients with IBD, both as a treatment-naïve and as a replacement for ADA originator for non-medical reasons.","PeriodicalId":73085,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 is equally effective and safe in long-term management of inflammatory bowel diseases patients when used as first biologic treatment or as replace of the ADA originator for a non-medical reason\",\"authors\":\"Giammarco Mocci, Arianna Cingolani, Giorgia Orrù, Carla Felice, Francesca Maria Onidi, Gianmarco Lombardi, Davide Checchin, Raffaele Colucci, Laurino Grossi, Antonio Ferronato, Chiara Rocchi, Marta Ascolani, Paolo Usai Satta, Lucia Fanini, Stefano Pilati, Antonio Tursi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgstr.2023.1218228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective Biosimilars represent a new opportunity for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment and economic sustainability of therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of the adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 in biologic-naïve vs. biologic-switched IBD patients. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted using a database of patients with IBD treated with ABP 501, biologic-naïve or switched from the original, at eight IBD centers. We included adult patients with at least one year of follow-up. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy (persistence) and safety (adverse event rate) of ABP 501 therapy. Results A total of 118 patients with IBD were included in the analysis: 84 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) (39 women, 45 men, mean age 40.4 ± 14.3 years; 33% biologic-naïve) and 34 patients with ulcerative Colitis (UC) (16 women, 18 men, mean age 38.9 ± 14.9 years; 61.8% biologic-naïve). Regarding the primary endpoint, no difference was observed in the efficacy between biologic-naïve patients and patients with Adalimumab (ADA) originator replacement for non-medical reasons in terms of long-term persistence. However, ABP 501 showed a higher percentage of sustained clinical remission at 2 years in patients with CD (64 patients, 77%) than in those with UC (15 patients, 45.5%; p=0.00091). Nine patients (six with CD and three with UC) experienced adverse events that led to drug discontinuation in three. Conclusions APB 501 showed a good safety and efficacy profile in maintaining clinical response at 2 years in patients with IBD, both as a treatment-naïve and as a replacement for ADA originator for non-medical reasons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2023.1218228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2023.1218228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的生物仿制药为炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗和治疗的经济可持续性提供了新的机会。本研究旨在评估阿达木单抗生物仿制药ABP 501在biologic-naïve与生物转换IBD患者中的疗效和长期安全性。方法对8个IBD中心的IBD患者数据库进行回顾性观察性研究,这些患者接受ABP 501、biologic-naïve或从原来的转换治疗。我们纳入了至少随访一年的成年患者。本研究的主要目的是评估ABP 501治疗的有效性(持续性)和安全性(不良事件发生率)。结果118例IBD患者纳入分析:84例克罗恩病(CD)患者(女性39例,男性45例,平均年龄40.4±14.3岁;33% biologic-naïve)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC) 34例(女性16例,男性18例,平均年龄38.9±14.9岁;biologic-naive 61.8%)。关于主要终点,biologic-naïve患者和非医疗原因替代阿达木单抗(ADA)原药患者在长期持续性方面的疗效没有观察到差异。然而,ABP 501显示CD患者2年持续临床缓解的百分比(64例,77%)高于UC患者(15例,45.5%;p = 0.00091)。9名患者(6名乳糜泻患者和3名UC患者)出现不良事件,导致3名患者停药。结论APB 501在维持IBD患者2年临床反应方面表现出良好的安全性和有效性,无论是作为treatment-naïve还是作为非医学原因的ADA原药的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 is equally effective and safe in long-term management of inflammatory bowel diseases patients when used as first biologic treatment or as replace of the ADA originator for a non-medical reason
Objective Biosimilars represent a new opportunity for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment and economic sustainability of therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of the adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 in biologic-naïve vs. biologic-switched IBD patients. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted using a database of patients with IBD treated with ABP 501, biologic-naïve or switched from the original, at eight IBD centers. We included adult patients with at least one year of follow-up. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy (persistence) and safety (adverse event rate) of ABP 501 therapy. Results A total of 118 patients with IBD were included in the analysis: 84 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) (39 women, 45 men, mean age 40.4 ± 14.3 years; 33% biologic-naïve) and 34 patients with ulcerative Colitis (UC) (16 women, 18 men, mean age 38.9 ± 14.9 years; 61.8% biologic-naïve). Regarding the primary endpoint, no difference was observed in the efficacy between biologic-naïve patients and patients with Adalimumab (ADA) originator replacement for non-medical reasons in terms of long-term persistence. However, ABP 501 showed a higher percentage of sustained clinical remission at 2 years in patients with CD (64 patients, 77%) than in those with UC (15 patients, 45.5%; p=0.00091). Nine patients (six with CD and three with UC) experienced adverse events that led to drug discontinuation in three. Conclusions APB 501 showed a good safety and efficacy profile in maintaining clinical response at 2 years in patients with IBD, both as a treatment-naïve and as a replacement for ADA originator for non-medical reasons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current status and clinical applications of tissue engineering of the gastrointestinal tract: a systematized narrative review Fecal microbiota transplantation—could stool donors’ and receptors’ diet be the key to future success? X-ray phase-contrast 3D virtual histology characterises complex tissue architecture in colorectal cancer Adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 is equally effective and safe in long-term management of inflammatory bowel diseases patients when used as first biologic treatment or as replace of the ADA originator for a non-medical reason A blood-based transcriptomic signature stratifies severe Crohn’s disease and defines potentially targetable therapeutic pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1