军队、警察和公共部门的集体谈判权。比较法视角

Raluca DIMITRIU
{"title":"军队、警察和公共部门的集体谈判权。比较法视角","authors":"Raluca DIMITRIU","doi":"10.24818/eblj/2023/2/1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to collective bargaining is regulated differently depending on the legal system. A common basis does exist, however: this is the International Labour Organisation Convention no. 154 (1981), ratified by 50 states, including most of the member states of the European Union. However, with regard to police and military personnel, ILO Convention 154 leaves it to the discretion of the national law-maker to determine the extent to which the guarantees provided for in the Convention apply. Indeed, according to Articles 1 (2) and (3) of Convention 154, the extent to which the guarantees provided for in this Convention apply to the armed forces and the police may be determined by national laws or regulations or national practice. As regards the public service, special modalities of application of this Convention may be fixed by national laws or regulations or national practice. The paper will include a comparative analysis of the application of these provisions in 12 Member States of the European Union. Finally, we will try to draw up a relevant table as to how each national legislator understood to regulate this sensitive subject.","PeriodicalId":489367,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL","volume":"1 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The right to collective bargaining in the military, police, and public sector. A comparative law perspective\",\"authors\":\"Raluca DIMITRIU\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/eblj/2023/2/1.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The right to collective bargaining is regulated differently depending on the legal system. A common basis does exist, however: this is the International Labour Organisation Convention no. 154 (1981), ratified by 50 states, including most of the member states of the European Union. However, with regard to police and military personnel, ILO Convention 154 leaves it to the discretion of the national law-maker to determine the extent to which the guarantees provided for in the Convention apply. Indeed, according to Articles 1 (2) and (3) of Convention 154, the extent to which the guarantees provided for in this Convention apply to the armed forces and the police may be determined by national laws or regulations or national practice. As regards the public service, special modalities of application of this Convention may be fixed by national laws or regulations or national practice. The paper will include a comparative analysis of the application of these provisions in 12 Member States of the European Union. Finally, we will try to draw up a relevant table as to how each national legislator understood to regulate this sensitive subject.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EUROPEAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EUROPEAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/eblj/2023/2/1.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/eblj/2023/2/1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据不同的法律制度,对集体谈判权有不同的规定。然而,一个共同的基础确实存在:这是国际劳工组织公约。第154(1981)号公约,得到了50个国家的批准,其中包括欧洲联盟的大多数成员国。但是,关于警察和军事人员,劳工组织《第154号公约》将决定《公约》所规定的保障在何种程度上适用的自由裁量权留给国家立法者。事实上,根据《第154号公约》第1(2)和(3)条,本公约所规定的保证在多大程度上适用于武装部队和警察,可由国家法律或条例或国家惯例来决定。关于公务,适用本公约的特殊方式可由国家法律或条例或国家惯例确定。该文件将包括对这些规定在欧洲联盟12个成员国的适用情况的比较分析。最后,我们将设法拟定一份有关的表格,说明每个国家的立法者如何理解如何管理这一敏感问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The right to collective bargaining in the military, police, and public sector. A comparative law perspective
The right to collective bargaining is regulated differently depending on the legal system. A common basis does exist, however: this is the International Labour Organisation Convention no. 154 (1981), ratified by 50 states, including most of the member states of the European Union. However, with regard to police and military personnel, ILO Convention 154 leaves it to the discretion of the national law-maker to determine the extent to which the guarantees provided for in the Convention apply. Indeed, according to Articles 1 (2) and (3) of Convention 154, the extent to which the guarantees provided for in this Convention apply to the armed forces and the police may be determined by national laws or regulations or national practice. As regards the public service, special modalities of application of this Convention may be fixed by national laws or regulations or national practice. The paper will include a comparative analysis of the application of these provisions in 12 Member States of the European Union. Finally, we will try to draw up a relevant table as to how each national legislator understood to regulate this sensitive subject.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the legality of the director’s mandate in a Romanian Joint Stock Company The right to collective bargaining in the military, police, and public sector. A comparative law perspective Covering the financial risks of companies in the HoReCa field through insurance contracts and methods of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for these contracts Presentation of the SSM guide to the method of setting administrative pecuniary penalties Brief considerations about the perspectives of the Romanian legal and judicial space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1