昆士兰西部Pitta Pitta地区晚全新世古石质结构的分布、年代及意义

Q1 Arts and Humanities Queensland Archaeological Research Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.25120/qar.26.2023.4019
Eilis Brien, Lynley A. Wallis, Heather Burke, Yinika L. Perston, Lorna Bogdanek, Trevina Rogers, Tanya Rice, Pearl Eatts, Robert Jansen, Vladimir A. Levchenko
{"title":"昆士兰西部Pitta Pitta地区晚全新世古石质结构的分布、年代及意义","authors":"Eilis Brien, Lynley A. Wallis, Heather Burke, Yinika L. Perston, Lorna Bogdanek, Trevina Rogers, Tanya Rice, Pearl Eatts, Robert Jansen, Vladimir A. Levchenko","doi":"10.25120/qar.26.2023.4019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is considerable discourse around the timing of Australia’s interior colonisation and whether environmental or technological impacts pushed people into occupying more arid environments. However, the general scarcity of rockshelter sites and the limited amount of research undertaken to date in central western Queensland has meant this region has only been peripherally considered in such debates. It is well recognised that, by the time Europeans began documenting lifeways in the region in the late 1870s, central western Queensland had given rise to complex and thriving Aboriginal societies, despite the boom-or-bust nature of its seasonal cycles. One of these is the Pitta Pitta people, who had a pivotal role in a vast trade network that traversed the Lake Eyre Basin, extending north to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The Pitta Pitta are also seemingly unique in that, as far as available data suggest, they are the only group in western Queensland to have used stone in their construction of gunyahs (huts), despite similar environmental and geographic conditions in adjacent areas to the east (Diamantina National Park) and south (Mithaka Country). Here we describe 70 stone-based huts spread across four site complexes on Marion Downs Station and use these to underpin discussions about Pitta Pitta lifeways in the late Holocene.","PeriodicalId":37597,"journal":{"name":"Queensland Archaeological Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The distribution, chronology and significance of late Holocene aged stone-based structures on Pitta Pitta Country, western Queensland\",\"authors\":\"Eilis Brien, Lynley A. Wallis, Heather Burke, Yinika L. Perston, Lorna Bogdanek, Trevina Rogers, Tanya Rice, Pearl Eatts, Robert Jansen, Vladimir A. Levchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.25120/qar.26.2023.4019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is considerable discourse around the timing of Australia’s interior colonisation and whether environmental or technological impacts pushed people into occupying more arid environments. However, the general scarcity of rockshelter sites and the limited amount of research undertaken to date in central western Queensland has meant this region has only been peripherally considered in such debates. It is well recognised that, by the time Europeans began documenting lifeways in the region in the late 1870s, central western Queensland had given rise to complex and thriving Aboriginal societies, despite the boom-or-bust nature of its seasonal cycles. One of these is the Pitta Pitta people, who had a pivotal role in a vast trade network that traversed the Lake Eyre Basin, extending north to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The Pitta Pitta are also seemingly unique in that, as far as available data suggest, they are the only group in western Queensland to have used stone in their construction of gunyahs (huts), despite similar environmental and geographic conditions in adjacent areas to the east (Diamantina National Park) and south (Mithaka Country). Here we describe 70 stone-based huts spread across four site complexes on Marion Downs Station and use these to underpin discussions about Pitta Pitta lifeways in the late Holocene.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Queensland Archaeological Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Queensland Archaeological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25120/qar.26.2023.4019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queensland Archaeological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25120/qar.26.2023.4019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于澳大利亚内陆殖民的时间,以及环境或技术影响是否迫使人们占领更干旱的环境,有相当多的讨论。然而,迄今为止,在昆士兰州中西部,岩石掩体遗址普遍稀缺,研究数量有限,这意味着该地区在此类辩论中只被边缘化。众所周知,当欧洲人在19世纪70年代末开始记录该地区的生活方式时,昆士兰中西部已经出现了复杂而繁荣的土著社会,尽管其季节性周期具有繁荣或萧条的性质。其中之一是皮塔皮塔人,他们在横跨艾尔湖盆地,向北延伸至卡奔塔利亚湾的庞大贸易网络中扮演着关键角色。皮塔皮塔人似乎也很独特,据现有数据显示,他们是昆士兰州西部唯一一个使用石头建造棚屋的群体,尽管东部(Diamantina国家公园)和南部(Mithaka国家)邻近地区的环境和地理条件相似。在这里,我们描述了分布在Marion Downs车站四个遗址群中的70个石制小屋,并利用这些小屋来支撑全新世晚期Pitta Pitta生活方式的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The distribution, chronology and significance of late Holocene aged stone-based structures on Pitta Pitta Country, western Queensland
There is considerable discourse around the timing of Australia’s interior colonisation and whether environmental or technological impacts pushed people into occupying more arid environments. However, the general scarcity of rockshelter sites and the limited amount of research undertaken to date in central western Queensland has meant this region has only been peripherally considered in such debates. It is well recognised that, by the time Europeans began documenting lifeways in the region in the late 1870s, central western Queensland had given rise to complex and thriving Aboriginal societies, despite the boom-or-bust nature of its seasonal cycles. One of these is the Pitta Pitta people, who had a pivotal role in a vast trade network that traversed the Lake Eyre Basin, extending north to the Gulf of Carpentaria. The Pitta Pitta are also seemingly unique in that, as far as available data suggest, they are the only group in western Queensland to have used stone in their construction of gunyahs (huts), despite similar environmental and geographic conditions in adjacent areas to the east (Diamantina National Park) and south (Mithaka Country). Here we describe 70 stone-based huts spread across four site complexes on Marion Downs Station and use these to underpin discussions about Pitta Pitta lifeways in the late Holocene.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Queensland Archaeological Research
Queensland Archaeological Research Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Queensland Archaeological Research is a peer-reviewed journal published since 1984 devoted to publishing substantive, original and high-quality archaeological research pertaining to Queensland, Australia and adjacent areas. Data-rich manuscripts are particularly welcome. Queensland Archaeological Research is published in English in one volume each year. Submission of articles to Queensland Archaeological Research is free. Access to articles in Queensland Archaeological Research is free.
期刊最新文献
Weapons of the frontier wars The distribution, chronology and significance of late Holocene aged stone-based structures on Pitta Pitta Country, western Queensland Location of historic mass graves from the 1919 Spanish Influenza in the Aboriginal community of Cherbourg using geophysics Evidence of external contact between the Pacific Basin and the east coast of Australia during the Holocene: A review Beyond bridge and barrier: Reconceptualising Torres Strait as a co-constructed border zone in ethnographic object distributions between Queensland and New Guinea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1