作为“使用人工智能描述和解释乳房x光检查数据”服务的一部分,进行了前10,000次乳房x光检查。

Y. A. Vasiliev, A. V. Vladzimirsky, K. M. Arzamasov, I. M. Shulkin, L. E. Aksenova, L. D. Pestrenin, S. S. Semenov, D. V. Bondarchuk, I. V. Smirnov
{"title":"作为“使用人工智能描述和解释乳房x光检查数据”服务的一部分,进行了前10,000次乳房x光检查。","authors":"Y. A. Vasiliev, A. V. Vladzimirsky, K. M. Arzamasov, I. M. Shulkin, L. E. Aksenova, L. D. Pestrenin, S. S. Semenov, D. V. Bondarchuk, I. V. Smirnov","doi":"10.21045/1811-0185-2023-8-54-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence technologies have great potential in improving the effectiveness of screening programs in the detection of malignant neoplasms of the breast. Given the high social, demographic and economic importance of mass preventive research, there is no doubt that the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence must match or even exceed the accuracy of radiologists. In this regard, studies are needed to compare the accuracy of software based on artificial intelligence technology and radiologists during the mammography examinations in a clinical environment. P u r p o s e : to assess the quality of the medical service “Description and interpretation of mammography data using artificial intelligence” as part of screening. M a t e r i a l s a n d m e t h o d s . The sample for analysis consisted of 9684 digital mammograms. For each study, the BI-RADS category was determined by a radiologist and using software based on artificial intelligence technologies (AI based software) registered in the Russian Federation as a medical device. Forty-five studies from this sample with significant discrepancies in physician and software assessments were subject to peer review, which resulted in a BI-RADS category according to the physician expert. R e s u l t s . When evaluating weighted averages, there were no statistically significant differences between physician results and AI based software for 9684 digital mammography exams. Evaluation of physician and software consistency showed that matches are observed in 43,89% of cases for the BI-RADS scale and in 80,69% – 84,10% for binary scales. The presence of a case in which the pathology identified with the help of software and confirmed during the review of the results by the expert was missed by the doctor indicates the promise of using AI based software for evaluating mammography studies and requires further research. F i n d i n g s . When evaluating mammography studies, the agreement between the AI based decision and the radiologist reaches 84,10%, with the software assigning a higher BI-RADS category more often. Expert review of part of these discrepancies showed a potential reduction in the number of missed breast malignancies with the help of software.","PeriodicalId":270155,"journal":{"name":"Manager Zdravookhranenia","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The first 10,000 mammography exams performed as part of the “Description and interpretation of mammography data using artificial intelligence” service.\",\"authors\":\"Y. A. Vasiliev, A. V. Vladzimirsky, K. M. Arzamasov, I. M. Shulkin, L. E. Aksenova, L. D. Pestrenin, S. S. Semenov, D. V. Bondarchuk, I. V. Smirnov\",\"doi\":\"10.21045/1811-0185-2023-8-54-67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence technologies have great potential in improving the effectiveness of screening programs in the detection of malignant neoplasms of the breast. Given the high social, demographic and economic importance of mass preventive research, there is no doubt that the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence must match or even exceed the accuracy of radiologists. In this regard, studies are needed to compare the accuracy of software based on artificial intelligence technology and radiologists during the mammography examinations in a clinical environment. P u r p o s e : to assess the quality of the medical service “Description and interpretation of mammography data using artificial intelligence” as part of screening. M a t e r i a l s a n d m e t h o d s . The sample for analysis consisted of 9684 digital mammograms. For each study, the BI-RADS category was determined by a radiologist and using software based on artificial intelligence technologies (AI based software) registered in the Russian Federation as a medical device. Forty-five studies from this sample with significant discrepancies in physician and software assessments were subject to peer review, which resulted in a BI-RADS category according to the physician expert. R e s u l t s . When evaluating weighted averages, there were no statistically significant differences between physician results and AI based software for 9684 digital mammography exams. Evaluation of physician and software consistency showed that matches are observed in 43,89% of cases for the BI-RADS scale and in 80,69% – 84,10% for binary scales. The presence of a case in which the pathology identified with the help of software and confirmed during the review of the results by the expert was missed by the doctor indicates the promise of using AI based software for evaluating mammography studies and requires further research. F i n d i n g s . When evaluating mammography studies, the agreement between the AI based decision and the radiologist reaches 84,10%, with the software assigning a higher BI-RADS category more often. Expert review of part of these discrepancies showed a potential reduction in the number of missed breast malignancies with the help of software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manager Zdravookhranenia\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manager Zdravookhranenia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21045/1811-0185-2023-8-54-67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manager Zdravookhranenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21045/1811-0185-2023-8-54-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能技术在提高乳腺恶性肿瘤筛查方案的有效性方面具有巨大潜力。鉴于大规模预防研究在社会、人口和经济方面的高度重要性,毫无疑问,人工智能的诊断准确性必须匹配甚至超过放射科医生的准确性。因此,在临床环境下,基于人工智能技术的软件和放射科医生在乳房x光检查中的准确性需要进行比较研究。“利用人工智能描述和解释乳房x光检查数据”作为筛查的一部分,以评估医疗服务质量。我想把我的头发剪下来,然后把我的头发剪下来。用于分析的样本包括9684张数字乳房x线照片。对于每项研究,BI-RADS类别由放射科医生确定,并使用基于在俄罗斯联邦注册为医疗设备的人工智能技术(基于AI的软件)的软件。该样本中有45个在医生和软件评估方面存在显著差异的研究接受了同行评审,根据医生专家的意见,得出了BI-RADS类别。这是我最喜欢的。在评估加权平均值时,在9684次数字乳房x光检查中,医生结果与基于人工智能的软件之间没有统计学上的显著差异。医师和软件一致性评估显示,在43,89%的BI-RADS量表病例中观察到匹配,在88,69% - 84,10%的二进制量表中观察到匹配。在软件的帮助下识别并在专家审查结果时确认的病理被医生遗漏的病例表明,使用基于人工智能的软件来评估乳房x光检查的前景很好,需要进一步的研究。如果我发现了它。在评估乳房x光检查研究时,基于人工智能的决策与放射科医生之间的一致性达到81.4%,软件更经常分配更高的BI-RADS类别。专家对这些差异的部分审查表明,在软件的帮助下,乳腺癌漏诊的数量可能会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The first 10,000 mammography exams performed as part of the “Description and interpretation of mammography data using artificial intelligence” service.
Artificial intelligence technologies have great potential in improving the effectiveness of screening programs in the detection of malignant neoplasms of the breast. Given the high social, demographic and economic importance of mass preventive research, there is no doubt that the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence must match or even exceed the accuracy of radiologists. In this regard, studies are needed to compare the accuracy of software based on artificial intelligence technology and radiologists during the mammography examinations in a clinical environment. P u r p o s e : to assess the quality of the medical service “Description and interpretation of mammography data using artificial intelligence” as part of screening. M a t e r i a l s a n d m e t h o d s . The sample for analysis consisted of 9684 digital mammograms. For each study, the BI-RADS category was determined by a radiologist and using software based on artificial intelligence technologies (AI based software) registered in the Russian Federation as a medical device. Forty-five studies from this sample with significant discrepancies in physician and software assessments were subject to peer review, which resulted in a BI-RADS category according to the physician expert. R e s u l t s . When evaluating weighted averages, there were no statistically significant differences between physician results and AI based software for 9684 digital mammography exams. Evaluation of physician and software consistency showed that matches are observed in 43,89% of cases for the BI-RADS scale and in 80,69% – 84,10% for binary scales. The presence of a case in which the pathology identified with the help of software and confirmed during the review of the results by the expert was missed by the doctor indicates the promise of using AI based software for evaluating mammography studies and requires further research. F i n d i n g s . When evaluating mammography studies, the agreement between the AI based decision and the radiologist reaches 84,10%, with the software assigning a higher BI-RADS category more often. Expert review of part of these discrepancies showed a potential reduction in the number of missed breast malignancies with the help of software.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expert assessment of indicators and indicators for the development of a model of digital maturity of primary health care Expert Approaches to Assessing the Organization of Oral and Maxillofacial Service at the regional level. Mixed, hybrid training as a necessary component of modern training of medical professionals. Early diagnosis of malignant skin tumors using a software product based on artificial intelligence and its medical and economic effect. Building an internal communication mechanism for participants in the procurement process of a public health institution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1