在大型畜栏式陷阱中捕获或狩猎的野猪:肉质性状的初步比较

IF 1.8 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Italian Journal of Food Safety Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.4081/ijfs.2023.11618
Caterina Altissimi, Eleonora Torregiani, Fausto Cambiotti, Rossana Roila, Raffaella Branciari, Samira Giovannini, David Ranucci
{"title":"在大型畜栏式陷阱中捕获或狩猎的野猪:肉质性状的初步比较","authors":"Caterina Altissimi, Eleonora Torregiani, Fausto Cambiotti, Rossana Roila, Raffaella Branciari, Samira Giovannini, David Ranucci","doi":"10.4081/ijfs.2023.11618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management and numerical control of wild boars mainly depend on hunting practices, even if other alternative strategies such as the use of traps and cages can be adopted. There is little information available on the quality of captured wild boar meat. The aim of this study was to evaluate the meat quality of wild boars captured with a large corral-style trap compared to still hunting and collective hunting methods. Longissimus dorsi samples were collected from 60 wild boars, 20 of which were obtained by trapping, 20 by still hunting, and 20 by collective hunting. The animals considered were 32 males and 28 females, weighing between 42 and 68 kg. Muscle pH has been recorded after 1, 24, and 48 hours post-mortem. Furthermore, after 24 hours, color, drip loss, cooking loss, and Warner-Bratzler shear force were also evaluated. Trapping with large enclosures such as corral-style traps, if properly managed, does not seem to adversely affect the quality traits of wild boar meat, which were found to be like those obtained by the still hunting method.","PeriodicalId":14508,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Food Safety","volume":"27 40","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wild boar captured in a large corral-style trap or hunted: preliminary comparison of meat quality traits\",\"authors\":\"Caterina Altissimi, Eleonora Torregiani, Fausto Cambiotti, Rossana Roila, Raffaella Branciari, Samira Giovannini, David Ranucci\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ijfs.2023.11618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The management and numerical control of wild boars mainly depend on hunting practices, even if other alternative strategies such as the use of traps and cages can be adopted. There is little information available on the quality of captured wild boar meat. The aim of this study was to evaluate the meat quality of wild boars captured with a large corral-style trap compared to still hunting and collective hunting methods. Longissimus dorsi samples were collected from 60 wild boars, 20 of which were obtained by trapping, 20 by still hunting, and 20 by collective hunting. The animals considered were 32 males and 28 females, weighing between 42 and 68 kg. Muscle pH has been recorded after 1, 24, and 48 hours post-mortem. Furthermore, after 24 hours, color, drip loss, cooking loss, and Warner-Bratzler shear force were also evaluated. Trapping with large enclosures such as corral-style traps, if properly managed, does not seem to adversely affect the quality traits of wild boar meat, which were found to be like those obtained by the still hunting method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Journal of Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"27 40\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Journal of Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2023.11618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2023.11618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野猪的管理和数量控制主要依靠狩猎活动,即使可以采用其他替代策略,如使用陷阱和笼子。关于捕获的野猪肉质量的信息很少。本研究的目的是比较用大型畜栏式陷阱捕获的野猪与静止狩猎和集体狩猎方法的肉质。采集60只野猪背最长肌标本,其中诱捕法20只,静捕法20只,集体狩猎法20只。研究对象为32只雄性和28只雌性,体重在42至68公斤之间。分别在死后1、24和48小时记录肌肉pH值。24小时后,观察颜色、滴漏损失、蒸煮损失和Warner-Bratzler剪切力。如果管理得当,用诸如畜栏式陷阱之类的大型围栏进行诱捕,似乎不会对野猪肉的质量性状产生不利影响,这些品质性状与用静止狩猎方法获得的品质性状相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wild boar captured in a large corral-style trap or hunted: preliminary comparison of meat quality traits
The management and numerical control of wild boars mainly depend on hunting practices, even if other alternative strategies such as the use of traps and cages can be adopted. There is little information available on the quality of captured wild boar meat. The aim of this study was to evaluate the meat quality of wild boars captured with a large corral-style trap compared to still hunting and collective hunting methods. Longissimus dorsi samples were collected from 60 wild boars, 20 of which were obtained by trapping, 20 by still hunting, and 20 by collective hunting. The animals considered were 32 males and 28 females, weighing between 42 and 68 kg. Muscle pH has been recorded after 1, 24, and 48 hours post-mortem. Furthermore, after 24 hours, color, drip loss, cooking loss, and Warner-Bratzler shear force were also evaluated. Trapping with large enclosures such as corral-style traps, if properly managed, does not seem to adversely affect the quality traits of wild boar meat, which were found to be like those obtained by the still hunting method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Italian Journal of Food Safety
Italian Journal of Food Safety FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Safety (IJFS) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Veterinary Food Hygienists (AIVI). The Journal addresses veterinary food hygienists, specialists in the food industry and experts offering technical support and advice on food of animal origin. The Journal of Food Safety publishes original research papers concerning food safety and hygiene, animal health, zoonoses and food safety, food safety economics. Reviews, editorials, technical reports, brief notes, conference proceedings, letters to the Editor, book reviews are also welcome. Every article published in the Journal will be peer-reviewed by experts in the field and selected by members of the editorial board. The publication of manuscripts is subject to the approval of the Editor who has knowledge of the field discussed in the manuscript in accordance with the principles of Peer Review; referees will be selected from the Editorial Board or among qualified scientists of the international scientific community. Articles must be written in English and must adhere to the guidelines and details contained in the Instructions to Authors.
期刊最新文献
Wild boar captured in a large corral-style trap or hunted: preliminary comparison of meat quality traits Lactic acid bacteria from artisanal raw goat milk cheeses: technological properties and antimicrobial potential Occurrence and distribution of <i>Salmonella</i> serovars associated with human infection isolated from irrigation waters and food-producing animals in southern Italy: eleven-year monitoring (2011-2021) <i>Trichinella</i> spp. detection in hunted wild boar (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) diaphragm biopsies in Central Italy A study on the occurrence of human enteric viruses in salad vegetables and seafood and associated health risks for consumers in Mauritius
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1