下颌后根残端拔除中使用尖部吊具与起重机吊具的比较评价

Q3 Dentistry Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1111/ors.12858
Mili Mehta, Sonal Shah, Bhimappa Rudagi, Piyush Lunkad, Bhushan Bhagat, Smriti Ticku
{"title":"下颌后根残端拔除中使用尖部吊具与起重机吊具的比较评价","authors":"Mili Mehta, Sonal Shah, Bhimappa Rudagi, Piyush Lunkad, Bhushan Bhagat, Smriti Ticku","doi":"10.1111/ors.12858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose The crane pick elevator is a solid version of the pick‐type dental elevator that rolls the root out of the socket using the wheel and axle method. The traditional apexo elevator works on the wedge principle, wherein it helps to retrieve root stumps below the gingival line. Although most of the extractions can be performed with routine techniques and instruments, there is a constant urge to improve these conventional procedures with newer instruments and techniques. Thus, we intend to do a comparative study, evaluating the efficiency of apexo elevators versus crane pick elevators in the extraction of mandibular root stumps. Patients and Methods This was a comparative in vivo study conducted on a total of 68 patients aged 18 years and above. They were divided into two groups of 34 each using a random number generator. The patients were evaluated on the basis of their gender, whether extraction was successful, time taken for extraction, operators' difficulty, root length and the tooth that was extracted. Results Majority of the participants were males in the apexo group (61.7%) and females in the crane pick group (55.8%). InAU terms of successful extraction, it was seen to be more with apexo elevators compared to crane pick elevators and is statistically significant (0.04*). The operator encountered greater difficulty during the removal of root stumps with crane pick elevators. Conclusion We concluded that crane pick elevators are useful in luxating apical one third of the root when fractured. However, apexo elevators are better when it comes to delivering the tooth out of the socket.","PeriodicalId":38418,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery","volume":"1 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of use of apexo elevators versus crane pick elevators in extraction of mandibular posterior root stumps\",\"authors\":\"Mili Mehta, Sonal Shah, Bhimappa Rudagi, Piyush Lunkad, Bhushan Bhagat, Smriti Ticku\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ors.12858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Purpose The crane pick elevator is a solid version of the pick‐type dental elevator that rolls the root out of the socket using the wheel and axle method. The traditional apexo elevator works on the wedge principle, wherein it helps to retrieve root stumps below the gingival line. Although most of the extractions can be performed with routine techniques and instruments, there is a constant urge to improve these conventional procedures with newer instruments and techniques. Thus, we intend to do a comparative study, evaluating the efficiency of apexo elevators versus crane pick elevators in the extraction of mandibular root stumps. Patients and Methods This was a comparative in vivo study conducted on a total of 68 patients aged 18 years and above. They were divided into two groups of 34 each using a random number generator. The patients were evaluated on the basis of their gender, whether extraction was successful, time taken for extraction, operators' difficulty, root length and the tooth that was extracted. Results Majority of the participants were males in the apexo group (61.7%) and females in the crane pick group (55.8%). InAU terms of successful extraction, it was seen to be more with apexo elevators compared to crane pick elevators and is statistically significant (0.04*). The operator encountered greater difficulty during the removal of root stumps with crane pick elevators. Conclusion We concluded that crane pick elevators are useful in luxating apical one third of the root when fractured. However, apexo elevators are better when it comes to delivering the tooth out of the socket.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

起重机镐式提升机是镐式牙科提升机的固体版本,使用轮轴方法将牙根从插座中滚动出来。传统的根尖提升器是根据楔形原理工作的,它可以帮助牙龈线以下的牙根残端恢复。虽然大多数的拔牙可以用常规的技术和仪器进行,但人们一直迫切需要用新的仪器和技术来改进这些传统的程序。因此,我们打算做一项比较研究,评估顶端升降机与起重机升降机在下颌根残端拔除中的效率。患者和方法这是一项对68名18岁及以上患者进行的体内比较研究。他们被分成两组,每组34人,每组使用随机数发生器。根据患者的性别、拔牙是否成功、拔牙时间、操作难度、牙根长度和所拔出的牙进行评估。结果尖顶组以男性居多(61.7%),鹤钩组以女性居多(55.8%)。在成功提取方面,与起重机升降机相比,apex升降机被认为更多,并且具有统计学意义(0.04*)。操作人员在使用起重机铲斗升降机移除根桩时遇到了更大的困难。结论起重机吊具对根尖三分之一的脱位有较好的效果。然而,在将牙齿从牙槽中取出时,尖顶升降机更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative evaluation of use of apexo elevators versus crane pick elevators in extraction of mandibular posterior root stumps
Abstract Purpose The crane pick elevator is a solid version of the pick‐type dental elevator that rolls the root out of the socket using the wheel and axle method. The traditional apexo elevator works on the wedge principle, wherein it helps to retrieve root stumps below the gingival line. Although most of the extractions can be performed with routine techniques and instruments, there is a constant urge to improve these conventional procedures with newer instruments and techniques. Thus, we intend to do a comparative study, evaluating the efficiency of apexo elevators versus crane pick elevators in the extraction of mandibular root stumps. Patients and Methods This was a comparative in vivo study conducted on a total of 68 patients aged 18 years and above. They were divided into two groups of 34 each using a random number generator. The patients were evaluated on the basis of their gender, whether extraction was successful, time taken for extraction, operators' difficulty, root length and the tooth that was extracted. Results Majority of the participants were males in the apexo group (61.7%) and females in the crane pick group (55.8%). InAU terms of successful extraction, it was seen to be more with apexo elevators compared to crane pick elevators and is statistically significant (0.04*). The operator encountered greater difficulty during the removal of root stumps with crane pick elevators. Conclusion We concluded that crane pick elevators are useful in luxating apical one third of the root when fractured. However, apexo elevators are better when it comes to delivering the tooth out of the socket.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery
Oral Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Calcification of stylohyoid ligaments and its association with obesity: A cross‐sectional retrospective study Superficial skin necrosis as a rare complication of inferior alveolar nerve block in Egyptian child: A case report The dental management of patients with Brugada syndrome: A case series Spindle cell carcinoma of the maxillary antrum presenting in the oral cavity: A case report Challenge and strategy in the management of retrobulbar hematoma: A case evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1