定量荧光血管造影中丸传递时间测量不确定度的降低

Yang Gao, Miriam Weiß, Werner Nahm
{"title":"定量荧光血管造影中丸传递时间测量不确定度的降低","authors":"Yang Gao, Miriam Weiß, Werner Nahm","doi":"10.1515/cdbme-2023-1155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During cerebral revascularization surgeries, blood flow values help surgeons to monitor the quality of the procedure, e.g., to avoid cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome due to excessively enhanced perfusion. The state-of-the-art technique is the ultrasonic flow probe that has to be placed around the blood vessel. This causes contact between probe and vessel, which, in the worst case, leads to rupture. The recently developed intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) Quantitative Fluorescence Angiography (QFA) is an alternative technique that overcomes this risk. However, it has been shown by the developer that the calculated flow has deviations. After determining the bolus transit time as the most sensitive parameter in flow calculation, we propose a new two-step uncertainty reduction method for flow calculation. The first step is to generate more data in each measurement that results in functions of the parameters. Noise can then be reduced in a second step. Two methods for this step are compared. The first method fits the model for each parameter function separately and calculates flow from models, while the second one fits multiple parameter functions together. The latter method is proven to perform best by in silico tests. Besides, this method reduces the deviation of flow comparing to original QFA as expected. Our approach can be generally used in all QFA applications using two-point theory. Further development is possible if number of dimensions of the achieved parameter data are broadened that results in even more data for processing in the second step.","PeriodicalId":10739,"journal":{"name":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction of Uncertainty in Bolus Transit Time Measurement in Quantitative Fluorescence Angiography\",\"authors\":\"Yang Gao, Miriam Weiß, Werner Nahm\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cdbme-2023-1155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract During cerebral revascularization surgeries, blood flow values help surgeons to monitor the quality of the procedure, e.g., to avoid cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome due to excessively enhanced perfusion. The state-of-the-art technique is the ultrasonic flow probe that has to be placed around the blood vessel. This causes contact between probe and vessel, which, in the worst case, leads to rupture. The recently developed intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) Quantitative Fluorescence Angiography (QFA) is an alternative technique that overcomes this risk. However, it has been shown by the developer that the calculated flow has deviations. After determining the bolus transit time as the most sensitive parameter in flow calculation, we propose a new two-step uncertainty reduction method for flow calculation. The first step is to generate more data in each measurement that results in functions of the parameters. Noise can then be reduced in a second step. Two methods for this step are compared. The first method fits the model for each parameter function separately and calculates flow from models, while the second one fits multiple parameter functions together. The latter method is proven to perform best by in silico tests. Besides, this method reduces the deviation of flow comparing to original QFA as expected. Our approach can be generally used in all QFA applications using two-point theory. Further development is possible if number of dimensions of the achieved parameter data are broadened that results in even more data for processing in the second step.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2023-1155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2023-1155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在脑血运重建术中,血流量值有助于外科医生监测手术质量,例如避免因过度增强灌注而引起脑高灌注综合征。最先进的技术是超声波流量探头,它必须放置在血管周围。这会导致探头与血管接触,在最坏的情况下,会导致破裂。最近发展的术中吲哚菁绿(ICG)定量荧光血管造影(QFA)是克服这种风险的一种替代技术。然而,开发商已经表明,计算的流量有偏差。在确定了流体流动计算中最敏感的参数是流体通过时间后,提出了一种新的两步不确定性降低方法。第一步是在每次测量中生成更多的数据,从而得到参数的函数。然后在第二步中减少噪音。比较了这一步骤的两种方法。第一种方法是对每个参数函数分别拟合模型,从模型中计算流量;第二种方法是对多个参数函数一起拟合。后一种方法经计算机测试证明效果最好。此外,与原QFA相比,该方法还减少了流量的偏差。我们的方法可以在使用两点理论的所有QFA应用中普遍使用。如果所获得的参数数据的维数得到扩大,则可以进一步开发,从而在第二步中处理更多的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reduction of Uncertainty in Bolus Transit Time Measurement in Quantitative Fluorescence Angiography
Abstract During cerebral revascularization surgeries, blood flow values help surgeons to monitor the quality of the procedure, e.g., to avoid cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome due to excessively enhanced perfusion. The state-of-the-art technique is the ultrasonic flow probe that has to be placed around the blood vessel. This causes contact between probe and vessel, which, in the worst case, leads to rupture. The recently developed intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) Quantitative Fluorescence Angiography (QFA) is an alternative technique that overcomes this risk. However, it has been shown by the developer that the calculated flow has deviations. After determining the bolus transit time as the most sensitive parameter in flow calculation, we propose a new two-step uncertainty reduction method for flow calculation. The first step is to generate more data in each measurement that results in functions of the parameters. Noise can then be reduced in a second step. Two methods for this step are compared. The first method fits the model for each parameter function separately and calculates flow from models, while the second one fits multiple parameter functions together. The latter method is proven to perform best by in silico tests. Besides, this method reduces the deviation of flow comparing to original QFA as expected. Our approach can be generally used in all QFA applications using two-point theory. Further development is possible if number of dimensions of the achieved parameter data are broadened that results in even more data for processing in the second step.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
239
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Stability of cell adhesion noise analysis for the detection of cancer cell lines Consideration of Kv ion channels as firstorder systems Photovoltaic Stimulation Induces Overdrive Suppression in Embryonic Chicken Cardiomyocytes Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Water Level Tank and Human Fluid Flow ECG Beat classification: Impact of linear dependent samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1