塞来昔布药物溶液的喷墨印刷性能

Ahmed Sannan, Robert Mau, Hermann Seitz, Thomas Eickner, Michael Teske, Niels Grabow
{"title":"塞来昔布药物溶液的喷墨印刷性能","authors":"Ahmed Sannan, Robert Mau, Hermann Seitz, Thomas Eickner, Michael Teske, Niels Grabow","doi":"10.1515/cdbme-2023-1083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Inkjet printing is a versatile tool for the precise positioning of droplets that is used in many application areas such as 3D printing, biotechnology or pharmacy. This work focused on comparing the inkjet printability of different drug solutions of celecoxib (CLX), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, to produce drug depots in medical implants. CLX was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and a mixture of DMSO and PEGDA in a ratio of 1:1. The pure solvents and the drug solutions were inkjet printed using a Nanoplotter 2.1 with the NanoTip J printhead (GeSiM mbH, Radeberg, Germany). The voltage was varied from 60 V to 150 V using a step size of 5 V. Droplet volume and the trajectory of the droplets were investigated. For DMSO, DMSO-CLX, DMSO-PEGDA and DMSOPEGDA- CLX, reproducible droplet formation occurred with a droplet volume of approximately 300 pl - 500 pl and not more than one satellite droplet in a voltage range between 60 V to 80 V. Inkjet printing of PEGDA and PEGDA-CLX was not reproducible in the range of 60 V to 150 V. DMSO, DMSOPEGDA, DMSO-CLX and DMSO-PEGDA-CLX showed a high inkjet printability. In contrast, inkjet printability of PEGDA and PEGDA-CLX was very limited.","PeriodicalId":10739,"journal":{"name":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inkjet printability of Celecoxib drug solutions\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Sannan, Robert Mau, Hermann Seitz, Thomas Eickner, Michael Teske, Niels Grabow\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cdbme-2023-1083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Inkjet printing is a versatile tool for the precise positioning of droplets that is used in many application areas such as 3D printing, biotechnology or pharmacy. This work focused on comparing the inkjet printability of different drug solutions of celecoxib (CLX), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, to produce drug depots in medical implants. CLX was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and a mixture of DMSO and PEGDA in a ratio of 1:1. The pure solvents and the drug solutions were inkjet printed using a Nanoplotter 2.1 with the NanoTip J printhead (GeSiM mbH, Radeberg, Germany). The voltage was varied from 60 V to 150 V using a step size of 5 V. Droplet volume and the trajectory of the droplets were investigated. For DMSO, DMSO-CLX, DMSO-PEGDA and DMSOPEGDA- CLX, reproducible droplet formation occurred with a droplet volume of approximately 300 pl - 500 pl and not more than one satellite droplet in a voltage range between 60 V to 80 V. Inkjet printing of PEGDA and PEGDA-CLX was not reproducible in the range of 60 V to 150 V. DMSO, DMSOPEGDA, DMSO-CLX and DMSO-PEGDA-CLX showed a high inkjet printability. In contrast, inkjet printability of PEGDA and PEGDA-CLX was very limited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2023-1083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2023-1083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要喷墨打印是一种多功能的工具,用于液滴的精确定位,用于许多应用领域,如3D打印,生物技术或制药。本研究的重点是比较塞来昔布(一种非甾体抗炎药)不同药物溶液在医用植入物中生产药库的喷墨可打印性。CLX溶解在二甲亚砜(DMSO)、聚乙二醇二丙烯酸酯(PEGDA)和DMSO和PEGDA的混合物中,比例为1:1。使用NanoTip J打印头(GeSiM mbH, Radeberg,德国)的nano绘图仪2.1对纯溶剂和药物溶液进行喷墨打印。使用5 V的步长将电压从60 V变化到150 V。研究了液滴的体积和运动轨迹。对于DMSO, DMSO-CLX, DMSO- pegda和DMSOPEGDA- CLX,在60 V至80 V的电压范围内,可重复形成的液滴体积约为300 pl - 500 pl,不超过一个卫星液滴。PEGDA和PEGDA- clx的喷墨打印在60 ~ 150 V范围内是不可复制的。DMSO、DMSOPEGDA、DMSO- clx和DMSO- pegda - clx表现出较高的喷墨打印适性。相比之下,PEGDA和PEGDA- clx的喷墨打印能力非常有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inkjet printability of Celecoxib drug solutions
Abstract Inkjet printing is a versatile tool for the precise positioning of droplets that is used in many application areas such as 3D printing, biotechnology or pharmacy. This work focused on comparing the inkjet printability of different drug solutions of celecoxib (CLX), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, to produce drug depots in medical implants. CLX was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and a mixture of DMSO and PEGDA in a ratio of 1:1. The pure solvents and the drug solutions were inkjet printed using a Nanoplotter 2.1 with the NanoTip J printhead (GeSiM mbH, Radeberg, Germany). The voltage was varied from 60 V to 150 V using a step size of 5 V. Droplet volume and the trajectory of the droplets were investigated. For DMSO, DMSO-CLX, DMSO-PEGDA and DMSOPEGDA- CLX, reproducible droplet formation occurred with a droplet volume of approximately 300 pl - 500 pl and not more than one satellite droplet in a voltage range between 60 V to 80 V. Inkjet printing of PEGDA and PEGDA-CLX was not reproducible in the range of 60 V to 150 V. DMSO, DMSOPEGDA, DMSO-CLX and DMSO-PEGDA-CLX showed a high inkjet printability. In contrast, inkjet printability of PEGDA and PEGDA-CLX was very limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
239
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Stability of cell adhesion noise analysis for the detection of cancer cell lines Consideration of Kv ion channels as firstorder systems Photovoltaic Stimulation Induces Overdrive Suppression in Embryonic Chicken Cardiomyocytes Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Water Level Tank and Human Fluid Flow ECG Beat classification: Impact of linear dependent samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1