一种新型的气流环,用于减少手术现场的细菌负荷

Andreas Scherrieble, Elena Haab, Evi Held-Föhn, Carsten Linti, Michael Doser, Götz T. Gresser, Tobias Baumgartner, Claus G. Wandres
{"title":"一种新型的气流环,用于减少手术现场的细菌负荷","authors":"Andreas Scherrieble, Elena Haab, Evi Held-Föhn, Carsten Linti, Michael Doser, Götz T. Gresser, Tobias Baumgartner, Claus G. Wandres","doi":"10.1515/cdbme-2023-1098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hospital-acquired infections occur through microbial contamination of the surgical wound and can lead to severe complications. A significant transmission path is the aerogenic transmission, where pathogens stick to floating particles like skin scales or to air moisture. A novel porous airflow ring which is placed around the surgical field aims to overcome this by applying sterile air directly at the operation wound. The ring is provided with an air tight coating at the outer side and allows for fixation on the skin by an adhesive coating at the lower side. To evaluate its performance the airflow ring was placed in an atmosphere with nebulized suspension of Staphylococcus arlettae of a concentration of 5.0 x 10^5 CFU/ml resp. 5.0 x 10^6 CFU/ml within a box. The formation of bacterial colonies (CFU) on contact plates placed within the airflow ring was subsequently determined by visual counting after incubating at 37 °C for one day. CFU counts of the ventilated and the unventilated situation were compared. With the smaller inoculum, the introduction of bacteria into the inner site of the ring was completely prevented, whereas the contact plate of the unventilated ring resulted in 77 to 427 colonies in different trials. With the higher inoculum, the bacteria ingress was very strongly reduced by 99.7% respectively 99.9%. In conclusion the airflow ring shows a strong shielding effect for germs adhered to fog-sized water droplets. To clearly demonstrate the effect, the number of bacteria was greatly increased compared to reality in this setup. It was shown that it can withstand even conditions significantly worse than those encountered in an operating theatre. In order to demonstrate the effect in vivo, clinical trials have to be conducted to confirm the laboratory results.","PeriodicalId":10739,"journal":{"name":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel airflow ring for the reduction of germ load in a surgical field\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Scherrieble, Elena Haab, Evi Held-Föhn, Carsten Linti, Michael Doser, Götz T. Gresser, Tobias Baumgartner, Claus G. Wandres\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cdbme-2023-1098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Hospital-acquired infections occur through microbial contamination of the surgical wound and can lead to severe complications. A significant transmission path is the aerogenic transmission, where pathogens stick to floating particles like skin scales or to air moisture. A novel porous airflow ring which is placed around the surgical field aims to overcome this by applying sterile air directly at the operation wound. The ring is provided with an air tight coating at the outer side and allows for fixation on the skin by an adhesive coating at the lower side. To evaluate its performance the airflow ring was placed in an atmosphere with nebulized suspension of Staphylococcus arlettae of a concentration of 5.0 x 10^5 CFU/ml resp. 5.0 x 10^6 CFU/ml within a box. The formation of bacterial colonies (CFU) on contact plates placed within the airflow ring was subsequently determined by visual counting after incubating at 37 °C for one day. CFU counts of the ventilated and the unventilated situation were compared. With the smaller inoculum, the introduction of bacteria into the inner site of the ring was completely prevented, whereas the contact plate of the unventilated ring resulted in 77 to 427 colonies in different trials. With the higher inoculum, the bacteria ingress was very strongly reduced by 99.7% respectively 99.9%. In conclusion the airflow ring shows a strong shielding effect for germs adhered to fog-sized water droplets. To clearly demonstrate the effect, the number of bacteria was greatly increased compared to reality in this setup. It was shown that it can withstand even conditions significantly worse than those encountered in an operating theatre. In order to demonstrate the effect in vivo, clinical trials have to be conducted to confirm the laboratory results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2023-1098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2023-1098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医院获得性感染是通过外科伤口的微生物污染而发生的,可导致严重的并发症。一个重要的传播途径是空气传播,病原体附着在皮肤鳞片等漂浮颗粒或空气湿度上。一种新型的多孔气流环被放置在手术区域周围,旨在通过将无菌空气直接应用于手术伤口来克服这一问题。所述环在其外侧设有气密涂层,并允许在其下侧通过粘合剂涂层固定在皮肤上。为了评估其性能,将气流环放置在浓度为5.0 × 10^5 CFU/ml的葡萄球菌雾化悬浮液的气氛中。盒内5.0 x 10^6 CFU/ml。在37°C孵育1天后,通过目测计数测定放置在气流环内的接触板上菌落(CFU)的形成。比较通风与不通风情况下的CFU计数。较小的接种量完全阻止了细菌进入环内部位,而不通风环的接触板在不同的试验中产生了77 ~ 427个菌落。在较高的接种量下,细菌的进入率分别降低了99.7%和99.9%。综上所述,气流环对附着在雾状水滴上的细菌具有较强的屏蔽作用。为了清楚地证明这种效果,在这种设置中,细菌的数量大大增加了。研究表明,它甚至可以承受比手术室更恶劣的条件。为了证明在体内的效果,必须进行临床试验来确认实验室结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel airflow ring for the reduction of germ load in a surgical field
Abstract Hospital-acquired infections occur through microbial contamination of the surgical wound and can lead to severe complications. A significant transmission path is the aerogenic transmission, where pathogens stick to floating particles like skin scales or to air moisture. A novel porous airflow ring which is placed around the surgical field aims to overcome this by applying sterile air directly at the operation wound. The ring is provided with an air tight coating at the outer side and allows for fixation on the skin by an adhesive coating at the lower side. To evaluate its performance the airflow ring was placed in an atmosphere with nebulized suspension of Staphylococcus arlettae of a concentration of 5.0 x 10^5 CFU/ml resp. 5.0 x 10^6 CFU/ml within a box. The formation of bacterial colonies (CFU) on contact plates placed within the airflow ring was subsequently determined by visual counting after incubating at 37 °C for one day. CFU counts of the ventilated and the unventilated situation were compared. With the smaller inoculum, the introduction of bacteria into the inner site of the ring was completely prevented, whereas the contact plate of the unventilated ring resulted in 77 to 427 colonies in different trials. With the higher inoculum, the bacteria ingress was very strongly reduced by 99.7% respectively 99.9%. In conclusion the airflow ring shows a strong shielding effect for germs adhered to fog-sized water droplets. To clearly demonstrate the effect, the number of bacteria was greatly increased compared to reality in this setup. It was shown that it can withstand even conditions significantly worse than those encountered in an operating theatre. In order to demonstrate the effect in vivo, clinical trials have to be conducted to confirm the laboratory results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
239
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Stability of cell adhesion noise analysis for the detection of cancer cell lines Consideration of Kv ion channels as firstorder systems Photovoltaic Stimulation Induces Overdrive Suppression in Embryonic Chicken Cardiomyocytes Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Water Level Tank and Human Fluid Flow ECG Beat classification: Impact of linear dependent samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1