Laurel H. Messer, Colleen Bauza, Kellee M. Miller, Mark A. Clements, Daniel J. DeSalvo, Jennifer Sherr, Ruth S. Weinstock, Korey Hood, Lori M. Laffel
{"title":"青少年和年轻人报告的结果和使用连续血糖监测功能:来自CITY试验的报告","authors":"Laurel H. Messer, Colleen Bauza, Kellee M. Miller, Mark A. Clements, Daniel J. DeSalvo, Jennifer Sherr, Ruth S. Weinstock, Korey Hood, Lori M. Laffel","doi":"10.1155/2023/6906023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To evaluate patterns of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use and perceptions of quality of life in adolescents/young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after using CGM for up to 52 weeks in the CGM Intervention in Teens and Young (CITY) Adults randomized clinical trial (RCT). Subjects and Methods. Participants with T1D were initially randomized 1 : 1 to use of CGM or blood glucose meter (BGM) for 26 weeks. Following the RCT, participants in the BGM group initiated CGM (BGM–CGM cohort) and participants in the CGM group continued CGM (CGM–CGM cohort) for another 26 weeks. Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey-Pediatric Version (PAID-peds), Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS), Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale (HCS), Diabetes Technology Attitudes (DTA), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Benefits of CGM, and Burdens of CGM were completed at baseline, 26 and 52 weeks. Results. In both cohorts, >70% of participants were wearing CGM > 5 days/week at 52 weeks; 5% discontinued CGM. The majority used the mobile app to receive glucose data. Adolescents (14 to <19 years) were more likely to use SHARE features than young adults (80% versus 41%). CGM–CGM participants had significantly higher scores on GMSS, DTA, and HCS at 52 weeks compared with baseline, and reported higher benefit and lower burden perceptions than at baseline. Similar results were observed for the BGM–CGM cohort. Conclusions. Improvements in self-reported measures were observed in adolescents and young adults using CGM. As CGM use is also associated with better glycemic control, utilizing CGM may contribute to improving both medical outcomes and emotional health.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adolescent- and Young Adult-Reported Outcomes and Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Features: A Report from the CITY Trial\",\"authors\":\"Laurel H. Messer, Colleen Bauza, Kellee M. Miller, Mark A. Clements, Daniel J. DeSalvo, Jennifer Sherr, Ruth S. Weinstock, Korey Hood, Lori M. Laffel\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/6906023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To evaluate patterns of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use and perceptions of quality of life in adolescents/young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after using CGM for up to 52 weeks in the CGM Intervention in Teens and Young (CITY) Adults randomized clinical trial (RCT). Subjects and Methods. Participants with T1D were initially randomized 1 : 1 to use of CGM or blood glucose meter (BGM) for 26 weeks. Following the RCT, participants in the BGM group initiated CGM (BGM–CGM cohort) and participants in the CGM group continued CGM (CGM–CGM cohort) for another 26 weeks. Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey-Pediatric Version (PAID-peds), Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS), Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale (HCS), Diabetes Technology Attitudes (DTA), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Benefits of CGM, and Burdens of CGM were completed at baseline, 26 and 52 weeks. Results. In both cohorts, >70% of participants were wearing CGM > 5 days/week at 52 weeks; 5% discontinued CGM. The majority used the mobile app to receive glucose data. Adolescents (14 to <19 years) were more likely to use SHARE features than young adults (80% versus 41%). CGM–CGM participants had significantly higher scores on GMSS, DTA, and HCS at 52 weeks compared with baseline, and reported higher benefit and lower burden perceptions than at baseline. Similar results were observed for the BGM–CGM cohort. Conclusions. Improvements in self-reported measures were observed in adolescents and young adults using CGM. As CGM use is also associated with better glycemic control, utilizing CGM may contribute to improving both medical outcomes and emotional health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6906023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6906023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adolescent- and Young Adult-Reported Outcomes and Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Features: A Report from the CITY Trial
Objective. To evaluate patterns of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use and perceptions of quality of life in adolescents/young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after using CGM for up to 52 weeks in the CGM Intervention in Teens and Young (CITY) Adults randomized clinical trial (RCT). Subjects and Methods. Participants with T1D were initially randomized 1 : 1 to use of CGM or blood glucose meter (BGM) for 26 weeks. Following the RCT, participants in the BGM group initiated CGM (BGM–CGM cohort) and participants in the CGM group continued CGM (CGM–CGM cohort) for another 26 weeks. Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey-Pediatric Version (PAID-peds), Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS), Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale (HCS), Diabetes Technology Attitudes (DTA), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Benefits of CGM, and Burdens of CGM were completed at baseline, 26 and 52 weeks. Results. In both cohorts, >70% of participants were wearing CGM > 5 days/week at 52 weeks; 5% discontinued CGM. The majority used the mobile app to receive glucose data. Adolescents (14 to <19 years) were more likely to use SHARE features than young adults (80% versus 41%). CGM–CGM participants had significantly higher scores on GMSS, DTA, and HCS at 52 weeks compared with baseline, and reported higher benefit and lower burden perceptions than at baseline. Similar results were observed for the BGM–CGM cohort. Conclusions. Improvements in self-reported measures were observed in adolescents and young adults using CGM. As CGM use is also associated with better glycemic control, utilizing CGM may contribute to improving both medical outcomes and emotional health.