脑卒中患者中重度大脑中动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的检测:经颅彩色编码双工超声与计算机断层血管造影

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Ultrasound Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1177/1742271x231195723
Moussa Toudou-Daouda, Nicolas Chausson, Didier Smadja, Cosmin Alecu
{"title":"脑卒中患者中重度大脑中动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的检测:经颅彩色编码双工超声与计算机断层血管造影","authors":"Moussa Toudou-Daouda, Nicolas Chausson, Didier Smadja, Cosmin Alecu","doi":"10.1177/1742271x231195723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is a common cause of ischemic cerebrovascular events and is associated with a high risk of stroke recurrence. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography for moderate-to-severe middle cerebral artery stenosis in stroke patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out, including 31 patients aged ⩾18 years hospitalized for ischemic cerebrovascular event in whom middle cerebral artery stenosis ⩾30% was identified on computed tomography angiography. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography findings were compared to the degree of stenosis blindly identified on the computed tomography angiography used as the reference method. Results: Overall, 27 patients had M1 stenosis and the other 4 had M2 stenosis. To detect M2 stenosis ⩾ 50% and ⩾ 70%, stenotic to pre-stenotic ratio ⩾ 2 and ⩾ 3 had a sensitivity of 100%, respectively. To detect M1 stenosis ⩾ 70%, peak systolic velocity ⩾ 300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 53.8% and specificity of 85.7% with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.753 (95% confidence interval: 0.568–0.938; p = 0.026), and stenotic to pre-stenotic ratio ⩾ 3 had a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 78.6% (area under the curve = 0.854; 95% confidence interval: 0.707–1; p = 0.002). Middle cerebral artery/anterior cerebral artery velocity ratio < 0.7 had a sensitivity of 57.1% and specificity of 90% to detect dampened pre-stenotic flow in middle cerebral artery secondary to downstream M1 stenosis ⩾ 70% (area under the curve = 0.800; 95% confidence interval: 0.584–1; p = 0.040). This study showed that stenotic to pre-stenotic ratio ⩾ 3 was more sensitive than peak systolic velocity ⩾ 300 cm/s to screen M1 stenosis ⩾ 70%. Middle cerebral artery/anterior cerebral artery ratio < 0.7 was a good indirect sign to detect dampened pre-stenotic flow due to M1 stenosis ⩾ 70%.","PeriodicalId":23440,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound","volume":"355 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of moderate to severe middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis in stroke patients: Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography versus computed tomography angiography\",\"authors\":\"Moussa Toudou-Daouda, Nicolas Chausson, Didier Smadja, Cosmin Alecu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1742271x231195723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is a common cause of ischemic cerebrovascular events and is associated with a high risk of stroke recurrence. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography for moderate-to-severe middle cerebral artery stenosis in stroke patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out, including 31 patients aged ⩾18 years hospitalized for ischemic cerebrovascular event in whom middle cerebral artery stenosis ⩾30% was identified on computed tomography angiography. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography findings were compared to the degree of stenosis blindly identified on the computed tomography angiography used as the reference method. Results: Overall, 27 patients had M1 stenosis and the other 4 had M2 stenosis. To detect M2 stenosis ⩾ 50% and ⩾ 70%, stenotic to pre-stenotic ratio ⩾ 2 and ⩾ 3 had a sensitivity of 100%, respectively. To detect M1 stenosis ⩾ 70%, peak systolic velocity ⩾ 300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 53.8% and specificity of 85.7% with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.753 (95% confidence interval: 0.568–0.938; p = 0.026), and stenotic to pre-stenotic ratio ⩾ 3 had a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 78.6% (area under the curve = 0.854; 95% confidence interval: 0.707–1; p = 0.002). Middle cerebral artery/anterior cerebral artery velocity ratio < 0.7 had a sensitivity of 57.1% and specificity of 90% to detect dampened pre-stenotic flow in middle cerebral artery secondary to downstream M1 stenosis ⩾ 70% (area under the curve = 0.800; 95% confidence interval: 0.584–1; p = 0.040). This study showed that stenotic to pre-stenotic ratio ⩾ 3 was more sensitive than peak systolic velocity ⩾ 300 cm/s to screen M1 stenosis ⩾ 70%. Middle cerebral artery/anterior cerebral artery ratio < 0.7 was a good indirect sign to detect dampened pre-stenotic flow due to M1 stenosis ⩾ 70%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"355 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271x231195723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271x231195723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄是缺血性脑血管事件的常见原因,与卒中复发的高风险相关。本研究旨在评估经颅彩色编码双超对中重度脑卒中患者大脑中动脉狭窄的诊断准确性。方法:进行回顾性分析,包括31名年龄小于18岁的缺血性脑血管事件住院患者,其中在计算机断层扫描血管造影中发现大脑中动脉狭窄小于30%。将经颅彩色编码双超声检查结果与计算机断层血管造影盲目识别的狭窄程度作为参考方法进行比较。结果:M1狭窄27例,M2狭窄4例。为了检测M2狭窄大于或等于50%和大于或等于70%,狭窄与狭窄前比值大于或等于2和大于或等于3的敏感性分别为100%。为了检测M1狭窄小于70%,峰值收缩速度大于或等于300 cm/s的敏感性为53.8%,特异性为85.7%,接受者-操作特征曲线下面积为0.753(95%置信区间:0.568-0.938;P = 0.026),狭窄与狭窄前比值大于或等于3的敏感性为84.6%,特异性为78.6%(曲线下面积= 0.854;95%置信区间:0.707-1;P = 0.002)。大脑中动脉/大脑前动脉流速比<0.7的敏感性为57.1%,特异性为90%,以检测继发于下游M1狭窄小于70%的大脑中动脉狭窄前血流(曲线下面积= 0.800;95%置信区间:0.584-1;P = 0.040)。该研究表明,狭窄与狭窄前比值大于或等于300 cm/s的峰值收缩速度对筛选M1狭窄大于或等于70%的患者更敏感。大脑中动脉/大脑前动脉比值<0.7是一个很好的间接信号,用于检测由于M1狭窄小于70%而抑制的狭窄前血流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection of moderate to severe middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis in stroke patients: Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography versus computed tomography angiography
Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is a common cause of ischemic cerebrovascular events and is associated with a high risk of stroke recurrence. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography for moderate-to-severe middle cerebral artery stenosis in stroke patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out, including 31 patients aged ⩾18 years hospitalized for ischemic cerebrovascular event in whom middle cerebral artery stenosis ⩾30% was identified on computed tomography angiography. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography findings were compared to the degree of stenosis blindly identified on the computed tomography angiography used as the reference method. Results: Overall, 27 patients had M1 stenosis and the other 4 had M2 stenosis. To detect M2 stenosis ⩾ 50% and ⩾ 70%, stenotic to pre-stenotic ratio ⩾ 2 and ⩾ 3 had a sensitivity of 100%, respectively. To detect M1 stenosis ⩾ 70%, peak systolic velocity ⩾ 300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 53.8% and specificity of 85.7% with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.753 (95% confidence interval: 0.568–0.938; p = 0.026), and stenotic to pre-stenotic ratio ⩾ 3 had a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 78.6% (area under the curve = 0.854; 95% confidence interval: 0.707–1; p = 0.002). Middle cerebral artery/anterior cerebral artery velocity ratio < 0.7 had a sensitivity of 57.1% and specificity of 90% to detect dampened pre-stenotic flow in middle cerebral artery secondary to downstream M1 stenosis ⩾ 70% (area under the curve = 0.800; 95% confidence interval: 0.584–1; p = 0.040). This study showed that stenotic to pre-stenotic ratio ⩾ 3 was more sensitive than peak systolic velocity ⩾ 300 cm/s to screen M1 stenosis ⩾ 70%. Middle cerebral artery/anterior cerebral artery ratio < 0.7 was a good indirect sign to detect dampened pre-stenotic flow due to M1 stenosis ⩾ 70%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound
Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Ultrasound is the official journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS), a multidisciplinary, charitable society comprising radiologists, obstetricians, sonographers, physicists and veterinarians amongst others.
期刊最新文献
Two case reports of triple ectopic: Literature review of incidence, risk factors and management of recurrent ectopic pregnancy. Beyond the hernia in groin ultrasound. Investigation of artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support system's performance in reducing the fine needle aspiration rate of thyroid nodules: A pilot study. Advanced multimodal ultrasound for pre-operative assessment of skin tumours: A case series. Diagnostic accuracy of strain cervical elastography as a predictor for preterm delivery: A single tertiary care centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1