6.5马赫数钝前缘激波干扰气动热力学分析及后尾迹评估

Gaurav Shivpratap Singh, Chirag Sharma, Siddhant Swaroop Padhy, Deepu Dinesan, Bibin John
{"title":"6.5马赫数钝前缘激波干扰气动热力学分析及后尾迹评估","authors":"Gaurav Shivpratap Singh, Chirag Sharma, Siddhant Swaroop Padhy, Deepu Dinesan, Bibin John","doi":"10.1177/09544100231199859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A detailed numerical study of shock-wave interference on a cylindrical blunt leading edge in hypersonic flow is carried out to reveal the effect of shock-shock interaction on peak heating and blunt body aerodynamics. This study is unique in that it examines the effect of interactions on rear wake formation and aerodynamic forces acting on the blunt body. Six different shock wave interference patterns described by Edney are studied for a freestream Mach number of 6.5. Compressible Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations are solved using finite volume method to obtain accurate prediction of the flowfield and aerodynamic loads. Hugoniot jump conditions are imposed in the inlet boundary to realize oblique shock of desired strength to interact with the detached shock at specific location. Numerical predictions are in good agreement with reported experimental measurements. The results obtained in this study reveals that the type of shock-shock interaction pattern can significantly alter the characteristics of the rear wake. Comparisons to undisturbed flow conditions reveal that Type II to VI interactions lead to an increase in wake size, whereas Type I interaction shows a marginal reduction. These changes in wake size are attributed to modifications in the forebody boundary layer induced by the shock-shock interactions. In the case of Type I interaction, however, the transmitted wave interacting with the rear wake is found to be responsible for the marginal reduction in wake size. This study also shows that changes to the rear wake structure caused by the change in interaction type can affect aerodynamic loads. Type VI interaction recorded a maximum drag coefficient of 2.96, whereas Type IV interaction yielded a maximum lift coefficient of 0.992. These findings demonstrate the potential for dynamically adjusting the control forces of a flying body by manipulating shock interference.","PeriodicalId":54566,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aerothermodynamic analysis and rear wake assessment of shock wave interference over blunt leading edge at Mach 6.5\",\"authors\":\"Gaurav Shivpratap Singh, Chirag Sharma, Siddhant Swaroop Padhy, Deepu Dinesan, Bibin John\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09544100231199859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A detailed numerical study of shock-wave interference on a cylindrical blunt leading edge in hypersonic flow is carried out to reveal the effect of shock-shock interaction on peak heating and blunt body aerodynamics. This study is unique in that it examines the effect of interactions on rear wake formation and aerodynamic forces acting on the blunt body. Six different shock wave interference patterns described by Edney are studied for a freestream Mach number of 6.5. Compressible Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations are solved using finite volume method to obtain accurate prediction of the flowfield and aerodynamic loads. Hugoniot jump conditions are imposed in the inlet boundary to realize oblique shock of desired strength to interact with the detached shock at specific location. Numerical predictions are in good agreement with reported experimental measurements. The results obtained in this study reveals that the type of shock-shock interaction pattern can significantly alter the characteristics of the rear wake. Comparisons to undisturbed flow conditions reveal that Type II to VI interactions lead to an increase in wake size, whereas Type I interaction shows a marginal reduction. These changes in wake size are attributed to modifications in the forebody boundary layer induced by the shock-shock interactions. In the case of Type I interaction, however, the transmitted wave interacting with the rear wake is found to be responsible for the marginal reduction in wake size. This study also shows that changes to the rear wake structure caused by the change in interaction type can affect aerodynamic loads. Type VI interaction recorded a maximum drag coefficient of 2.96, whereas Type IV interaction yielded a maximum lift coefficient of 0.992. These findings demonstrate the potential for dynamically adjusting the control forces of a flying body by manipulating shock interference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100231199859\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100231199859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了揭示激波相互作用对峰值加热和钝体空气动力学的影响,对高超声速流动中圆柱钝前缘的激波干扰进行了详细的数值研究。这项研究的独特之处在于它考察了相互作用对后尾流形成和作用在钝体上的气动力的影响。在自由流马赫数为6.5的条件下,研究了Edney描述的六种不同的激波干涉模式。采用有限体积法求解可压缩reynolds -average Navier-Stokes方程,得到了精确的流场和气动载荷预测。在进口边界施加Hugoniot跳变条件,实现所需强度的斜激波在特定位置与分离激波相互作用。数值预测与报告的实验测量结果非常吻合。研究结果表明,冲击-冲击相互作用模式的类型可以显著改变后尾流的特性。与无扰动流动条件的比较表明,II型到VI型相互作用导致尾迹大小增加,而I型相互作用则显示出边际减小。这些尾迹大小的变化归因于激波-激波相互作用引起的前体边界层的改变。然而,在I型相互作用的情况下,发现与后尾迹相互作用的透射波是尾迹尺寸边际减小的原因。研究还表明,由于相互作用类型的改变而引起的后尾迹结构的变化会影响气动载荷。VI型相互作用最大阻力系数为2.96,IV型相互作用最大升力系数为0.992。这些发现证明了通过操纵冲击干扰来动态调整飞行体的控制力的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aerothermodynamic analysis and rear wake assessment of shock wave interference over blunt leading edge at Mach 6.5
A detailed numerical study of shock-wave interference on a cylindrical blunt leading edge in hypersonic flow is carried out to reveal the effect of shock-shock interaction on peak heating and blunt body aerodynamics. This study is unique in that it examines the effect of interactions on rear wake formation and aerodynamic forces acting on the blunt body. Six different shock wave interference patterns described by Edney are studied for a freestream Mach number of 6.5. Compressible Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations are solved using finite volume method to obtain accurate prediction of the flowfield and aerodynamic loads. Hugoniot jump conditions are imposed in the inlet boundary to realize oblique shock of desired strength to interact with the detached shock at specific location. Numerical predictions are in good agreement with reported experimental measurements. The results obtained in this study reveals that the type of shock-shock interaction pattern can significantly alter the characteristics of the rear wake. Comparisons to undisturbed flow conditions reveal that Type II to VI interactions lead to an increase in wake size, whereas Type I interaction shows a marginal reduction. These changes in wake size are attributed to modifications in the forebody boundary layer induced by the shock-shock interactions. In the case of Type I interaction, however, the transmitted wave interacting with the rear wake is found to be responsible for the marginal reduction in wake size. This study also shows that changes to the rear wake structure caused by the change in interaction type can affect aerodynamic loads. Type VI interaction recorded a maximum drag coefficient of 2.96, whereas Type IV interaction yielded a maximum lift coefficient of 0.992. These findings demonstrate the potential for dynamically adjusting the control forces of a flying body by manipulating shock interference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
212
审稿时长
5.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aerospace Engineering is dedicated to the publication of high quality research in all branches of applied sciences and technology dealing with aircraft and spacecraft, and their support systems. "Our authorship is truly international and all efforts are made to ensure that each paper is presented in the best possible way and reaches a wide audience. "The Editorial Board is composed of recognized experts representing the technical communities of fifteen countries. The Board Members work in close cooperation with the editors, reviewers, and authors to achieve a consistent standard of well written and presented papers."Professor Rodrigo Martinez-Val, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Fatigue life analysis of a composite materials structure using allowable strain criteria Feasibility study of carbon-fiber reinforced polymer linerless pressure vessel tank Testability modeling of aeroengine and analysis optimization method based on improved correlation matrix Research on a backstepping flight control method improved by STFT in atmospheric disturbance applications Evaluating the effect of frigate hangar shape modifications on helicopter recovery using piloted flight simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1