关键供应链社会责任方法的系统原则

Mohamed Basta, James Lapalme, Marc Paquet
{"title":"关键供应链社会责任方法的系统原则","authors":"Mohamed Basta, James Lapalme, Marc Paquet","doi":"10.1177/18479790231202420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social responsibility issues keep reoccurring despite the popularity of numerous approaches perceived widely as adequate. In this paper, the authors conducted a systematic literature review to explore this phenomenon from a systems thinking standpoint. The findings revealed that each approach is founded on a different systemic paradigm, makes different assumptions on the nature of social responsibility issues, and has different objectives when resolving them. Therefore, employing any of these approaches alone will certainly fail given their underlying systemic limitations. The findings also revealed that these approaches are complementary from a critical systems thinking perspective, hence, researchers and practitioners can use their tools and methods together in the form of tailored interventions to better address efficiency, subjectivity, and fairness when resolving social responsibility issues. This paper concludes by proposing a practical framework based on critical systems practice which encompasses four systemic paradigms allowing the inclusion of a spectrum of perspectives, and assumptions.","PeriodicalId":45882,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Business Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The systemic tenets of the key supply chain social responsibility approaches\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Basta, James Lapalme, Marc Paquet\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18479790231202420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social responsibility issues keep reoccurring despite the popularity of numerous approaches perceived widely as adequate. In this paper, the authors conducted a systematic literature review to explore this phenomenon from a systems thinking standpoint. The findings revealed that each approach is founded on a different systemic paradigm, makes different assumptions on the nature of social responsibility issues, and has different objectives when resolving them. Therefore, employing any of these approaches alone will certainly fail given their underlying systemic limitations. The findings also revealed that these approaches are complementary from a critical systems thinking perspective, hence, researchers and practitioners can use their tools and methods together in the form of tailored interventions to better address efficiency, subjectivity, and fairness when resolving social responsibility issues. This paper concludes by proposing a practical framework based on critical systems practice which encompasses four systemic paradigms allowing the inclusion of a spectrum of perspectives, and assumptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Engineering Business Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Engineering Business Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790231202420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Business Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790231202420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会责任问题不断出现,尽管许多方法普遍被认为是适当的。本文通过系统的文献综述,从系统思维的角度对这一现象进行了探讨。研究结果表明,每种方法都建立在不同的系统范式之上,对社会责任问题的性质做出了不同的假设,并且在解决社会责任问题时具有不同的目标。因此,考虑到潜在的系统局限性,单独使用这些方法中的任何一种都肯定会失败。研究结果还表明,从批判性系统思维的角度来看,这些方法是互补的,因此,研究人员和从业人员可以将他们的工具和方法结合起来,以量身定制的干预形式更好地解决社会责任问题时的效率、主观性和公平性。本文最后提出了一个基于关键系统实践的实践框架,该框架包含四个系统范式,允许包含一系列观点和假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The systemic tenets of the key supply chain social responsibility approaches
Social responsibility issues keep reoccurring despite the popularity of numerous approaches perceived widely as adequate. In this paper, the authors conducted a systematic literature review to explore this phenomenon from a systems thinking standpoint. The findings revealed that each approach is founded on a different systemic paradigm, makes different assumptions on the nature of social responsibility issues, and has different objectives when resolving them. Therefore, employing any of these approaches alone will certainly fail given their underlying systemic limitations. The findings also revealed that these approaches are complementary from a critical systems thinking perspective, hence, researchers and practitioners can use their tools and methods together in the form of tailored interventions to better address efficiency, subjectivity, and fairness when resolving social responsibility issues. This paper concludes by proposing a practical framework based on critical systems practice which encompasses four systemic paradigms allowing the inclusion of a spectrum of perspectives, and assumptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Engineering Business Management (IJEBM) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal that aims to promote an integrated and multidisciplinary approach to engineering, business and management. The journal focuses on issues related to the design, development and implementation of new methodologies and technologies that contribute to strategic and operational improvements of organizations within the contemporary global business environment. IJEBM encourages a systematic and holistic view in order to ensure an integrated and economically, socially and environmentally friendly approach to management of new technologies in business. It aims to be a world-class research platform for academics, managers, and professionals to publish scholarly research in the global arena. All submitted articles considered suitable for the International Journal of Engineering Business Management are subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure the highest levels of quality. The review process is carried out as quickly as possible to minimize any delays in the online publication of articles. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: -Competitive product design and innovation -Operations and manufacturing strategy -Knowledge management and knowledge innovation -Information and decision support systems -Radio Frequency Identification -Wireless Sensor Networks -Industrial engineering for business improvement -Logistics engineering and transportation -Modeling and simulation of industrial and business systems -Quality management and Six Sigma -Automation of industrial processes and systems -Manufacturing performance and productivity measurement -Supply Chain Management and the virtual enterprise network -Environmental, legal and social aspects -Technology Capital and Financial Modelling -Engineering Economics and Investment Theory -Behavioural, Social and Political factors in Engineering
期刊最新文献
Configurational risks and innovation performance of complex product systems development: A fsQCA lens Entrepreneurship environments and entrepreneurial intention- the role of self efficacy and role model Integrating human factors into the distribution model of goods and fast-moving consumer goods for effective inventory control Towards a framework for successful metaverse adoption in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: An exploratory study Digital supply chain transformation: The role of smart technologies on operational performance in manufacturing industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1