聪明还是聪明?金融制裁对商品和服务贸易的影响

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of International Economics Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1111/roie.12706
Tibor Besedeš, Stefan Goldbach, Volker Nitsch
{"title":"聪明还是聪明?金融制裁对商品和服务贸易的影响","authors":"Tibor Besedeš, Stefan Goldbach, Volker Nitsch","doi":"10.1111/roie.12706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We examine the extent to which financial sanctions imposed by Germany through its European Union and United Nations commitments cause collateral damage on Germany's trade in goods and services. Financial sanctions reduce Germany's inflows and outflows of financial assets, as well as imports and exports of goods and services. The relative effects on trade in goods and services are weaker than on financial assets, about half as large in the case of goods and two‐thirds as large in the case of services. The effect on trade in goods is entirely due to episodes where financial sanctions are accompanied by export restrictions of specific goods. In the case of services trade, only exports are affected by financial sanctions once export restrictions are considered. The primary channel through which sanctions affect the three types of cross‐border flows is the extensive margin. Anticipation effects are quite strong for financial assets and weak for services and goods.","PeriodicalId":47712,"journal":{"name":"Review of International Economics","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smart or smash? The effect of financial sanctions on trade in goods and services\",\"authors\":\"Tibor Besedeš, Stefan Goldbach, Volker Nitsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/roie.12706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We examine the extent to which financial sanctions imposed by Germany through its European Union and United Nations commitments cause collateral damage on Germany's trade in goods and services. Financial sanctions reduce Germany's inflows and outflows of financial assets, as well as imports and exports of goods and services. The relative effects on trade in goods and services are weaker than on financial assets, about half as large in the case of goods and two‐thirds as large in the case of services. The effect on trade in goods is entirely due to episodes where financial sanctions are accompanied by export restrictions of specific goods. In the case of services trade, only exports are affected by financial sanctions once export restrictions are considered. The primary channel through which sanctions affect the three types of cross‐border flows is the extensive margin. Anticipation effects are quite strong for financial assets and weak for services and goods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of International Economics\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of International Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12706\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了德国通过其欧盟和联合国承诺实施的金融制裁在多大程度上对德国的货物和服务贸易造成附带损害。金融制裁减少了德国金融资产的流入和流出,以及商品和服务的进出口。对商品和服务贸易的相对影响弱于金融资产,对商品和服务贸易的影响约为商品和服务贸易的一半,对服务贸易的影响约为金融资产的三分之二。对货物贸易的影响完全是由于金融制裁伴随着对特定货物的出口限制。就服务贸易而言,一旦考虑出口限制,只有出口受到金融制裁的影响。制裁影响这三种类型跨境流动的主要渠道是广泛的边际。对金融资产的预期效应相当强,而对服务和商品的预期效应较弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smart or smash? The effect of financial sanctions on trade in goods and services
Abstract We examine the extent to which financial sanctions imposed by Germany through its European Union and United Nations commitments cause collateral damage on Germany's trade in goods and services. Financial sanctions reduce Germany's inflows and outflows of financial assets, as well as imports and exports of goods and services. The relative effects on trade in goods and services are weaker than on financial assets, about half as large in the case of goods and two‐thirds as large in the case of services. The effect on trade in goods is entirely due to episodes where financial sanctions are accompanied by export restrictions of specific goods. In the case of services trade, only exports are affected by financial sanctions once export restrictions are considered. The primary channel through which sanctions affect the three types of cross‐border flows is the extensive margin. Anticipation effects are quite strong for financial assets and weak for services and goods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Review of International Economics is devoted to the publication of high-quality articles on a full range of topics in international economics. The Review comprises controversial and innovative thought and detailed contributions from other directly related fields such as economic development; trade and the environment; and political economy. Whether theoretical, empirical or policy-oriented, its relevance to real world problems is of paramount concern.
期刊最新文献
Determinants and international transmission of interest rates: Do foreign reserves and sovereign debt matter? Firm‐level prices, quality, and markups: The role of immigrant workers Corporate tax, R&D and export decisions: Evidence from European firms Can exports be pain relievers? The effect of exports on workplace safety and health The Linder hypothesis for foreign direct investment revisited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1