探索世界上第一个成功的真相委员会:阿根廷的CONADEP和受害者在寻求真相中的作用

IF 0.9 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Human Rights Practice Pub Date : 2023-01-05 DOI:10.1093/jhuman/huac060
Valeria Vegh Weis
{"title":"探索世界上第一个成功的真相委员会:阿根廷的CONADEP和受害者在寻求真相中的作用","authors":"Valeria Vegh Weis","doi":"10.1093/jhuman/huac060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article will present the case of Argentina and the conditions, struggles and social actors that made the establishment of the world’s first successful truth commission possible after the most recent dictatorship, in power between 1976 and 1983. This study is aimed at not only acknowledging the work of civil society organizations, who pressure powerholders to be responsive to victims’ concerns, but to argue that victims’ organizations were the ones who took a leading role in the truth commissions/achieving justice or human rights. The article will also show that victims’ organizations have worked to reach their goals by engaging with the state from a proactive and empowered position that pushed the process forward over government resistance. Through this in-depth case study, the article aims to transform the question from what shall be done in terms of truth commissions to who shall do it. The assumption is that the leading role of victims’ organizations in engaging with the state through participatory democracy can foster truth-seeking mechanisms beyond the limits of realpolitik.","PeriodicalId":45407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the World’s First Successful Truth Commission: Argentina’s CONADEP and the Role of Victims in Truth-Seeking\",\"authors\":\"Valeria Vegh Weis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jhuman/huac060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article will present the case of Argentina and the conditions, struggles and social actors that made the establishment of the world’s first successful truth commission possible after the most recent dictatorship, in power between 1976 and 1983. This study is aimed at not only acknowledging the work of civil society organizations, who pressure powerholders to be responsive to victims’ concerns, but to argue that victims’ organizations were the ones who took a leading role in the truth commissions/achieving justice or human rights. The article will also show that victims’ organizations have worked to reach their goals by engaging with the state from a proactive and empowered position that pushed the process forward over government resistance. Through this in-depth case study, the article aims to transform the question from what shall be done in terms of truth commissions to who shall do it. The assumption is that the leading role of victims’ organizations in engaging with the state through participatory democracy can foster truth-seeking mechanisms beyond the limits of realpolitik.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Rights Practice\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Rights Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huac060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Rights Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huac060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将介绍阿根廷的情况,以及在1976年至1983年执政的最近一次独裁统治之后,世界上第一个成功建立真相委员会的条件、斗争和社会行动者。这项研究的目的不仅在于承认民间社会组织的工作,这些组织向当权者施压,要求他们对受害者的关切作出回应,而且还在于证明受害者组织在真相委员会/实现正义或人权方面发挥了主导作用。这篇文章还将展示,受害者组织通过积极主动地与政府接触,推动这一进程,克服政府的阻力,努力实现自己的目标。通过深入的案例研究,本文旨在将问题从真相委员会应该做什么转变为谁来做。其假设是,受害者组织通过参与式民主与国家接触的主导作用可以培养超越现实政治限制的寻求真相的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the World’s First Successful Truth Commission: Argentina’s CONADEP and the Role of Victims in Truth-Seeking
Abstract This article will present the case of Argentina and the conditions, struggles and social actors that made the establishment of the world’s first successful truth commission possible after the most recent dictatorship, in power between 1976 and 1983. This study is aimed at not only acknowledging the work of civil society organizations, who pressure powerholders to be responsive to victims’ concerns, but to argue that victims’ organizations were the ones who took a leading role in the truth commissions/achieving justice or human rights. The article will also show that victims’ organizations have worked to reach their goals by engaging with the state from a proactive and empowered position that pushed the process forward over government resistance. Through this in-depth case study, the article aims to transform the question from what shall be done in terms of truth commissions to who shall do it. The assumption is that the leading role of victims’ organizations in engaging with the state through participatory democracy can foster truth-seeking mechanisms beyond the limits of realpolitik.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Administrative Lawfare at the European Union’s External Borders: Some Perspectives on Administrative Regulation of NGO Search and Rescue Activities in Italy and the Situation at the Polish-Belarusian Border Specificity in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights A Jurisdictional Vertigo: Compulsory Arbitration, Sports and the European Court of Human Rights Forced Marriages in Times of Armed Conflict: An Implicit Paradox of Modern Slavery under International Humanitarian Law The Politics of Ambiguous Loss: Missing Persons and Social Ecologies after Armed Conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1