当代中国育儿性别角色观念及其社会经济差异

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY 社会 Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1177/2057150x231207121
Yichun Yang
{"title":"当代中国育儿性别角色观念及其社会经济差异","authors":"Yichun Yang","doi":"10.1177/2057150x231207121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender inequality in the division of childcare between parents has long been a focal topic in the field of family and marriage research. Drawing on Chinese Childbearing and Parenting Intentions and Behaviors Survey (CCPIBS) and employing latent class analysis modeling strategies, this article examines attitudes toward gender roles in child-rearing among Chinese people and how they are shaped by socioeconomic determinants. The empirical findings show that the distribution of attitudes toward the gender division in childcare conforms to three ideal types: the traditional “mother-oriented” parenting style, the “father-oriented” parenting style, and the “parental collaboration” parenting style. Among these, the “mother-oriented” type continues to be predominant, but the “father-oriented” and “parental collaboration” types are gaining acceptance. The results also show that attitudes toward gender division in child-rearing are influenced by multiple socioeconomic determinants in contemporary China: educationally and occupationally advantaged groups, urban hukou holders, and younger cohorts are more likely to hold more egalitarian and liberal views regarding child-rearing, suggesting that trends in gender ideology in child-rearing could be explained using structural theories of attitudinal change.","PeriodicalId":37302,"journal":{"name":"社会","volume":"4 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes toward gender roles in child-rearing and their socioeconomic differentials in contemporary China\",\"authors\":\"Yichun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2057150x231207121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gender inequality in the division of childcare between parents has long been a focal topic in the field of family and marriage research. Drawing on Chinese Childbearing and Parenting Intentions and Behaviors Survey (CCPIBS) and employing latent class analysis modeling strategies, this article examines attitudes toward gender roles in child-rearing among Chinese people and how they are shaped by socioeconomic determinants. The empirical findings show that the distribution of attitudes toward the gender division in childcare conforms to three ideal types: the traditional “mother-oriented” parenting style, the “father-oriented” parenting style, and the “parental collaboration” parenting style. Among these, the “mother-oriented” type continues to be predominant, but the “father-oriented” and “parental collaboration” types are gaining acceptance. The results also show that attitudes toward gender division in child-rearing are influenced by multiple socioeconomic determinants in contemporary China: educationally and occupationally advantaged groups, urban hukou holders, and younger cohorts are more likely to hold more egalitarian and liberal views regarding child-rearing, suggesting that trends in gender ideology in child-rearing could be explained using structural theories of attitudinal change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"社会\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"社会\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150x231207121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"社会","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150x231207121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

父母育儿分工中的性别不平等一直是家庭与婚姻研究领域的热点问题。根据中国生育和育儿意向和行为调查(CCPIBS),采用潜在阶级分析模型策略,研究了中国人对育儿中性别角色的态度,以及社会经济因素如何影响这些态度。实证结果表明,儿童对育儿性别分工的态度分布符合三种理想类型:传统的“母亲导向型”育儿方式、“父亲导向型”育儿方式和“父母协作型”育儿方式。其中,“以母亲为导向”的类型仍然占主导地位,但“以父亲为导向”和“父母合作”类型正在获得接受。研究结果还表明,当代中国对育儿中性别划分的态度受到多重社会经济因素的影响:教育和职业优势群体、城市户口持有者和年轻群体更有可能在育儿方面持有更平等和自由的观点,这表明育儿中性别意识形态的趋势可以用态度变化的结构理论来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes toward gender roles in child-rearing and their socioeconomic differentials in contemporary China
Gender inequality in the division of childcare between parents has long been a focal topic in the field of family and marriage research. Drawing on Chinese Childbearing and Parenting Intentions and Behaviors Survey (CCPIBS) and employing latent class analysis modeling strategies, this article examines attitudes toward gender roles in child-rearing among Chinese people and how they are shaped by socioeconomic determinants. The empirical findings show that the distribution of attitudes toward the gender division in childcare conforms to three ideal types: the traditional “mother-oriented” parenting style, the “father-oriented” parenting style, and the “parental collaboration” parenting style. Among these, the “mother-oriented” type continues to be predominant, but the “father-oriented” and “parental collaboration” types are gaining acceptance. The results also show that attitudes toward gender division in child-rearing are influenced by multiple socioeconomic determinants in contemporary China: educationally and occupationally advantaged groups, urban hukou holders, and younger cohorts are more likely to hold more egalitarian and liberal views regarding child-rearing, suggesting that trends in gender ideology in child-rearing could be explained using structural theories of attitudinal change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
社会
社会 Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6799
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Sociology is a peer reviewed, international journal with the following standards: 1. The purpose of the Journal is to publish (in the English language) articles, reviews and scholarly comment which have been judged worthy of publication by appropriate specialists and accepted by the University on studies relating to sociology. 2. The Journal will be international in the sense that it will seek, wherever possible, to publish material from authors with an international reputation and articles that are of interest to an international audience. 3. In pursuit of the above the journal shall: (i) draw on and include high quality work from the international community . The Journal shall include work representing the major areas of interest in sociology. (ii) avoid bias in favour of the interests of particular schools or directions of research or particular political or narrow disciplinary objectives to the exclusion of others; (iii) ensure that articles are written in a terminology and style which makes them intelligible, not merely within the context of a particular discipline or abstract mode, but across the domain of relevant disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Changing fertility patterns in China Who is the ideal parent of my children? A choice experiment study in China Fertility transition of Han and ethnic minorities in China: A tale of convergence and variation Attitudes toward gender roles in child-rearing and their socioeconomic differentials in contemporary China China's family planning policy and fertility transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1