以教师为中心的科学学习技巧与探究式科学实习的比较:小学生的认知

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.46328/ijemst.3146
Mirjam Ndaimehafo Asilevi, Sirpa Kärkkäinen, Kari Sormunen, Sari Havu-Nuutinen
{"title":"以教师为中心的科学学习技巧与探究式科学实习的比较:小学生的认知","authors":"Mirjam Ndaimehafo Asilevi, Sirpa Kärkkäinen, Kari Sormunen, Sari Havu-Nuutinen","doi":"10.46328/ijemst.3146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes and compares primary school students' perceptions of science learning skills in a teacher-centered approach (TCA) and in inquiry-based science fieldwork (IBSF). This comparison was prompted by primary school students' perceptions of science learning skills, which has recently gained momentum, and the Namibian primary schools' recent curriculum shift from TCA to IBSF. The study utilized quantitative cross-sectional data (n = 237) collected from two primary schools in the Oshana region of Namibia. The data were gathered via an online survey and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the TCA and IBSF groups. The results revealed that the students had positive to fairly positive perceptions of science learning skills in IBSF and very negative to negative perceptions of science learning skills in TCA, with the difference between the two perceptions being statistically significant. This may indicate that Namibian primary school students find it hard to develop science learning skills under TCA. Therefore, the current study provided evidence for the need to focus more on supporting students' science learning skills, particularly problem-solving, communication and teamwork skills. This implies that the IBSF teaching approach, which allows students to become aware of the importance of science learning skills, must be adopted in Namibian primary schools. The paper also discusses the benefits of IBSF of science learning skills in students.","PeriodicalId":44518,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","volume":"17 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Science Learning Skills in the Teacher-centered Approach and Inquiry-based Science Fieldwork: Primary School Students' Perceptions\",\"authors\":\"Mirjam Ndaimehafo Asilevi, Sirpa Kärkkäinen, Kari Sormunen, Sari Havu-Nuutinen\",\"doi\":\"10.46328/ijemst.3146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes and compares primary school students' perceptions of science learning skills in a teacher-centered approach (TCA) and in inquiry-based science fieldwork (IBSF). This comparison was prompted by primary school students' perceptions of science learning skills, which has recently gained momentum, and the Namibian primary schools' recent curriculum shift from TCA to IBSF. The study utilized quantitative cross-sectional data (n = 237) collected from two primary schools in the Oshana region of Namibia. The data were gathered via an online survey and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the TCA and IBSF groups. The results revealed that the students had positive to fairly positive perceptions of science learning skills in IBSF and very negative to negative perceptions of science learning skills in TCA, with the difference between the two perceptions being statistically significant. This may indicate that Namibian primary school students find it hard to develop science learning skills under TCA. Therefore, the current study provided evidence for the need to focus more on supporting students' science learning skills, particularly problem-solving, communication and teamwork skills. This implies that the IBSF teaching approach, which allows students to become aware of the importance of science learning skills, must be adopted in Namibian primary schools. The paper also discusses the benefits of IBSF of science learning skills in students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述并比较了小学生在以教师为中心的方法(TCA)和以探究为基础的科学实地工作(IBSF)中对科学学习技能的看法。这一比较是由小学生对科学学习技能的看法引起的,这种看法最近得到了发展,而且纳米比亚小学最近的课程从TCA转向了IBSF。该研究利用了从纳米比亚奥沙纳地区的两所小学收集的定量横断面数据(n = 237)。这些数据是通过在线调查收集的,并使用描述性统计进行分析。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较TCA组和IBSF组。结果表明,学生对IBSF的科学学习技能有积极到相当积极的感知,对TCA的科学学习技能有非常消极到消极的感知,两者的感知差异有统计学意义。这可能表明纳米比亚小学生在TCA下很难培养科学学习技能。因此,目前的研究提供了证据,证明需要更多地关注支持学生的科学学习技能,特别是解决问题、沟通和团队合作技能。这意味着纳米比亚的小学必须采用IBSF的教学方法,这种方法可以让学生意识到科学学习技能的重要性。本文还讨论了IBSF对学生科学学习技能的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of Science Learning Skills in the Teacher-centered Approach and Inquiry-based Science Fieldwork: Primary School Students' Perceptions
This paper describes and compares primary school students' perceptions of science learning skills in a teacher-centered approach (TCA) and in inquiry-based science fieldwork (IBSF). This comparison was prompted by primary school students' perceptions of science learning skills, which has recently gained momentum, and the Namibian primary schools' recent curriculum shift from TCA to IBSF. The study utilized quantitative cross-sectional data (n = 237) collected from two primary schools in the Oshana region of Namibia. The data were gathered via an online survey and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the TCA and IBSF groups. The results revealed that the students had positive to fairly positive perceptions of science learning skills in IBSF and very negative to negative perceptions of science learning skills in TCA, with the difference between the two perceptions being statistically significant. This may indicate that Namibian primary school students find it hard to develop science learning skills under TCA. Therefore, the current study provided evidence for the need to focus more on supporting students' science learning skills, particularly problem-solving, communication and teamwork skills. This implies that the IBSF teaching approach, which allows students to become aware of the importance of science learning skills, must be adopted in Namibian primary schools. The paper also discusses the benefits of IBSF of science learning skills in students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
23.10%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The Degree of Special Education Teachers’ Employment of Electronic Educational Games in Teaching Disabled Students Focus on the Assessment Concerns of In-service and Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Stereotypes and Views of Science among Elementary Students: Gender and Grade Differences Systematic Review: Trends in Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Mathematics Teaching and Learning Computational Thinking Research in Mathematics Learning in the Last Decade: A Bibliometric Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1