面临风险的回报:女童教育和2019冠状病毒病的性别种族白话

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Comparative Education Review Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1086/726614
Rachel Silver, Alyssa Morley
{"title":"面临风险的回报:女童教育和2019冠状病毒病的性别种族白话","authors":"Rachel Silver, Alyssa Morley","doi":"10.1086/726614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since COVID-19 closed schools in March 2020, international development experts, politicians, and celebrities across the globe have raised alarm about the pandemic’s impacts on girls’ education, particularly in Africa. These warnings, which link school closures with untimely pregnancy and marriage, reflect belief in the multiplicative power of girls’ schooling and a long-standing concern with the sexual practices of Black and African girls. In this article, we explore English-language reporting on girls’ education from March 2020 to March 2021 to ask: (1) How has COVID-19 been framed as a crisis for girls? (2) How do these discourses relate to a history of anxiety about African girls’ sexuality? and (3) What does this mean for girls’ education as a global endeavor? Drawing on critical feminist and development theories, we argue that discourses of gendered risk and lost returns emphasize sexualized problems and reproduce racialized difference. Specifically, COVID-19 responses deploy and legitimize a gendered “racial vernacular” (Pierre 2020) that underpins and reifies white supremacy. We contend that these framings are both socially and materially consequential.","PeriodicalId":51506,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Education Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Returns at Risk: Girls’ Education and the Gendered Racial Vernacular of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Silver, Alyssa Morley\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since COVID-19 closed schools in March 2020, international development experts, politicians, and celebrities across the globe have raised alarm about the pandemic’s impacts on girls’ education, particularly in Africa. These warnings, which link school closures with untimely pregnancy and marriage, reflect belief in the multiplicative power of girls’ schooling and a long-standing concern with the sexual practices of Black and African girls. In this article, we explore English-language reporting on girls’ education from March 2020 to March 2021 to ask: (1) How has COVID-19 been framed as a crisis for girls? (2) How do these discourses relate to a history of anxiety about African girls’ sexuality? and (3) What does this mean for girls’ education as a global endeavor? Drawing on critical feminist and development theories, we argue that discourses of gendered risk and lost returns emphasize sexualized problems and reproduce racialized difference. Specifically, COVID-19 responses deploy and legitimize a gendered “racial vernacular” (Pierre 2020) that underpins and reifies white supremacy. We contend that these framings are both socially and materially consequential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Education Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726614\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2019冠状病毒病于2020年3月关闭学校以来,全球国际发展专家、政治家和名人都对疫情对女童教育的影响提出了警告,尤其是在非洲。这些警告将学校停课与过早怀孕和结婚联系起来,反映出人们相信女孩上学的倍增作用,并长期关注黑人和非洲女孩的性行为。在本文中,我们探讨了2020年3月至2021年3月期间关于女童教育的英语报告,并提出以下问题:(1)如何将COVID-19定义为女童的危机?(2)这些话语与对非洲女孩性行为的焦虑历史有什么关系?(3)这对全球女童教育事业意味着什么?借鉴批判性女权主义和发展理论,我们认为性别风险和失去的回报的话语强调性别化的问题和再现种族化的差异。具体而言,2019冠状病毒病应对措施部署了一种性别化的“种族白话”(Pierre 2020),并使其合法化,这种白话支撑并具体化了白人至上主义。我们认为,这些框架既具有社会意义,又具有物质意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Returns at Risk: Girls’ Education and the Gendered Racial Vernacular of COVID-19
Since COVID-19 closed schools in March 2020, international development experts, politicians, and celebrities across the globe have raised alarm about the pandemic’s impacts on girls’ education, particularly in Africa. These warnings, which link school closures with untimely pregnancy and marriage, reflect belief in the multiplicative power of girls’ schooling and a long-standing concern with the sexual practices of Black and African girls. In this article, we explore English-language reporting on girls’ education from March 2020 to March 2021 to ask: (1) How has COVID-19 been framed as a crisis for girls? (2) How do these discourses relate to a history of anxiety about African girls’ sexuality? and (3) What does this mean for girls’ education as a global endeavor? Drawing on critical feminist and development theories, we argue that discourses of gendered risk and lost returns emphasize sexualized problems and reproduce racialized difference. Specifically, COVID-19 responses deploy and legitimize a gendered “racial vernacular” (Pierre 2020) that underpins and reifies white supremacy. We contend that these framings are both socially and materially consequential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Education Review
Comparative Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Comparative Education Review investigates education throughout the world and the social, economic, and political forces that shape it. Founded in 1957 to advance knowledge and teaching in comparative education studies, the Review has since established itself as the most reliable source for the analysis of the place of education in countries other than the United States.
期刊最新文献
Reconceptualizing Violence in International and Comparative Education: Revisiting Galtung’s Framework Renewing Protest and Earth Day at School: Thinking with Recent Texts on Anticolonial Methods and Climate Change Education :Emergent Trends in Comparative Education: The Dialectical of the Global and the Local Comparative Education Review Guide to Searching for World Literature 2023 :Navigating Precarity in Educational Contexts: Reflection, Pedagogy, and Activism for Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1