{"title":"面临风险的回报:女童教育和2019冠状病毒病的性别种族白话","authors":"Rachel Silver, Alyssa Morley","doi":"10.1086/726614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since COVID-19 closed schools in March 2020, international development experts, politicians, and celebrities across the globe have raised alarm about the pandemic’s impacts on girls’ education, particularly in Africa. These warnings, which link school closures with untimely pregnancy and marriage, reflect belief in the multiplicative power of girls’ schooling and a long-standing concern with the sexual practices of Black and African girls. In this article, we explore English-language reporting on girls’ education from March 2020 to March 2021 to ask: (1) How has COVID-19 been framed as a crisis for girls? (2) How do these discourses relate to a history of anxiety about African girls’ sexuality? and (3) What does this mean for girls’ education as a global endeavor? Drawing on critical feminist and development theories, we argue that discourses of gendered risk and lost returns emphasize sexualized problems and reproduce racialized difference. Specifically, COVID-19 responses deploy and legitimize a gendered “racial vernacular” (Pierre 2020) that underpins and reifies white supremacy. We contend that these framings are both socially and materially consequential.","PeriodicalId":51506,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Education Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Returns at Risk: Girls’ Education and the Gendered Racial Vernacular of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Silver, Alyssa Morley\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since COVID-19 closed schools in March 2020, international development experts, politicians, and celebrities across the globe have raised alarm about the pandemic’s impacts on girls’ education, particularly in Africa. These warnings, which link school closures with untimely pregnancy and marriage, reflect belief in the multiplicative power of girls’ schooling and a long-standing concern with the sexual practices of Black and African girls. In this article, we explore English-language reporting on girls’ education from March 2020 to March 2021 to ask: (1) How has COVID-19 been framed as a crisis for girls? (2) How do these discourses relate to a history of anxiety about African girls’ sexuality? and (3) What does this mean for girls’ education as a global endeavor? Drawing on critical feminist and development theories, we argue that discourses of gendered risk and lost returns emphasize sexualized problems and reproduce racialized difference. Specifically, COVID-19 responses deploy and legitimize a gendered “racial vernacular” (Pierre 2020) that underpins and reifies white supremacy. We contend that these framings are both socially and materially consequential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Education Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726614\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Returns at Risk: Girls’ Education and the Gendered Racial Vernacular of COVID-19
Since COVID-19 closed schools in March 2020, international development experts, politicians, and celebrities across the globe have raised alarm about the pandemic’s impacts on girls’ education, particularly in Africa. These warnings, which link school closures with untimely pregnancy and marriage, reflect belief in the multiplicative power of girls’ schooling and a long-standing concern with the sexual practices of Black and African girls. In this article, we explore English-language reporting on girls’ education from March 2020 to March 2021 to ask: (1) How has COVID-19 been framed as a crisis for girls? (2) How do these discourses relate to a history of anxiety about African girls’ sexuality? and (3) What does this mean for girls’ education as a global endeavor? Drawing on critical feminist and development theories, we argue that discourses of gendered risk and lost returns emphasize sexualized problems and reproduce racialized difference. Specifically, COVID-19 responses deploy and legitimize a gendered “racial vernacular” (Pierre 2020) that underpins and reifies white supremacy. We contend that these framings are both socially and materially consequential.
期刊介绍:
Comparative Education Review investigates education throughout the world and the social, economic, and political forces that shape it. Founded in 1957 to advance knowledge and teaching in comparative education studies, the Review has since established itself as the most reliable source for the analysis of the place of education in countries other than the United States.