网络宣言(上):少探索,多科学

Q4 Computer Science Performance Evaluation Review Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1145/3626570.3626609
Walter Willinger, Arpit Gupta, Arthur S. Jacobs, Roman Beltiukov, Ronaldo A. Ferreira, Lisandro Granville
{"title":"网络宣言(上):少探索,多科学","authors":"Walter Willinger, Arpit Gupta, Arthur S. Jacobs, Roman Beltiukov, Ronaldo A. Ferreira, Lisandro Granville","doi":"10.1145/3626570.3626609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of the latest techniques from artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to improve and automate the decision-making required for solving realworld network security and performance problems (NetAI, for short) has generated great excitement among networking researchers. However, network operators have remained very reluctant when it comes to deploying NetAI-based solutions in their production networks, mainly because the black-box nature of the underlying learning models forces operators to blindly trust these models without having any understanding of how they work, why they work, or when they don't work (and why not). Paraphrasing [1], we argue that to overcome this roadblock and ensure its future success in practice, NetAI \"has to get past its current stage of explorimentation, or the practice of poking around to see what happens, and has to start employing tools of the scientific method.\"","PeriodicalId":35745,"journal":{"name":"Performance Evaluation Review","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A NetAI Manifesto (Part I): Less Explorimentation, More Science\",\"authors\":\"Walter Willinger, Arpit Gupta, Arthur S. Jacobs, Roman Beltiukov, Ronaldo A. Ferreira, Lisandro Granville\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3626570.3626609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The application of the latest techniques from artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to improve and automate the decision-making required for solving realworld network security and performance problems (NetAI, for short) has generated great excitement among networking researchers. However, network operators have remained very reluctant when it comes to deploying NetAI-based solutions in their production networks, mainly because the black-box nature of the underlying learning models forces operators to blindly trust these models without having any understanding of how they work, why they work, or when they don't work (and why not). Paraphrasing [1], we argue that to overcome this roadblock and ensure its future success in practice, NetAI \\\"has to get past its current stage of explorimentation, or the practice of poking around to see what happens, and has to start employing tools of the scientific method.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":35745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Performance Evaluation Review\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Performance Evaluation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3626570.3626609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance Evaluation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3626570.3626609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

应用人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)的最新技术来改进和自动化解决现实世界网络安全和性能问题(简称NetAI)所需的决策,这在网络研究人员中引起了极大的兴奋。然而,当涉及到在其生产网络中部署基于netai的解决方案时,网络运营商仍然非常不情愿,主要是因为底层学习模型的黑箱性质迫使运营商盲目信任这些模型,而不了解它们如何工作、为什么工作或何时不起作用(以及为什么不起作用)。通过对[1]的解释,我们认为,要克服这一障碍并确保其未来在实践中的成功,NetAI“必须超越目前的探索阶段,或者是四处看看会发生什么的实践,并且必须开始使用科学方法的工具。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A NetAI Manifesto (Part I): Less Explorimentation, More Science
The application of the latest techniques from artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to improve and automate the decision-making required for solving realworld network security and performance problems (NetAI, for short) has generated great excitement among networking researchers. However, network operators have remained very reluctant when it comes to deploying NetAI-based solutions in their production networks, mainly because the black-box nature of the underlying learning models forces operators to blindly trust these models without having any understanding of how they work, why they work, or when they don't work (and why not). Paraphrasing [1], we argue that to overcome this roadblock and ensure its future success in practice, NetAI "has to get past its current stage of explorimentation, or the practice of poking around to see what happens, and has to start employing tools of the scientific method."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Performance Evaluation Review
Performance Evaluation Review Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
193
期刊最新文献
Exponential Tail Bounds on Queues Tackling Deployability Challenges in ML-Powered Networks GHZ distillation protocols in the presence of decoherence Markov Decision Process Framework for Control-Based Reinforcement Learning Entanglement Management through Swapping over Quantum Internets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1