公司不当行为的公共和私人制裁:来自上市公司的证据

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Competition Law & Economics Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1093/joclec/nhad010
Clara Cardone-Riportella, Myriam García-Olalla, Camilo J Vázquez-Ordás
{"title":"公司不当行为的公共和私人制裁:来自上市公司的证据","authors":"Clara Cardone-Riportella, Myriam García-Olalla, Camilo J Vázquez-Ordás","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims to evaluate the impact that the application of competition legislation exerts on financial markets. The sanctioning process is classified into three key moments: the announcement of an investigation when a case of corporate misconduct is suspected; the imposition of a fine, if applicable; and, finally, the rectification or ratification of the sanction. The impact of these announcements on share prices between 2013 and 2021 is analyzed using the event study methodology. This research focuses on companies listed on the Spanish stock exchange, yielding 22 firms with 95 observations. The results show a negative and significant market reaction to the series of announcements. While this reaction intensifies if the fine is ratified, the response becomes positive when the sanction is rectified and annulled. In conclusion, the evidence found allows us to state that the market does in effect penalize corporate misconduct. Furthermore, the public sanction imposed by the competent authority is then followed by a private sanction, which manifests itself as a drop in market value. This is consistent with a hypothetical effect of reputational loss, especially in those cases in which the sanction is more significant in relation to the company’s market value.","PeriodicalId":45547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public and Private Sanctions for Corporate Misconduct: Evidence From Listed Companies\",\"authors\":\"Clara Cardone-Riportella, Myriam García-Olalla, Camilo J Vázquez-Ordás\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/joclec/nhad010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper aims to evaluate the impact that the application of competition legislation exerts on financial markets. The sanctioning process is classified into three key moments: the announcement of an investigation when a case of corporate misconduct is suspected; the imposition of a fine, if applicable; and, finally, the rectification or ratification of the sanction. The impact of these announcements on share prices between 2013 and 2021 is analyzed using the event study methodology. This research focuses on companies listed on the Spanish stock exchange, yielding 22 firms with 95 observations. The results show a negative and significant market reaction to the series of announcements. While this reaction intensifies if the fine is ratified, the response becomes positive when the sanction is rectified and annulled. In conclusion, the evidence found allows us to state that the market does in effect penalize corporate misconduct. Furthermore, the public sanction imposed by the competent authority is then followed by a private sanction, which manifests itself as a drop in market value. This is consistent with a hypothetical effect of reputational loss, especially in those cases in which the sanction is more significant in relation to the company’s market value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Competition Law & Economics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Competition Law & Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhad010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhad010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文旨在评估竞争立法的实施对金融市场的影响。制裁过程分为三个关键时刻:在怀疑企业不当行为时宣布进行调查;罚款(如适用);最后,纠正或批准制裁。使用事件研究方法分析了这些公告对2013年至2021年间股价的影响。本研究的重点是在西班牙证券交易所上市的公司,产生了22家公司的95个观察结果。结果显示,市场对这一系列公告的反应是消极而显著的。如果罚款被批准,这种反应会加剧,但如果制裁被纠正并取消,这种反应就会变得积极。总之,发现的证据使我们能够声明,市场确实在惩罚企业的不当行为。此外,在主管当局实施公共制裁之后,接着是私人制裁,这表现为市场价值的下降。这与声誉损失的假设影响是一致的,特别是在制裁相对于公司的市场价值更为重要的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public and Private Sanctions for Corporate Misconduct: Evidence From Listed Companies
Abstract This paper aims to evaluate the impact that the application of competition legislation exerts on financial markets. The sanctioning process is classified into three key moments: the announcement of an investigation when a case of corporate misconduct is suspected; the imposition of a fine, if applicable; and, finally, the rectification or ratification of the sanction. The impact of these announcements on share prices between 2013 and 2021 is analyzed using the event study methodology. This research focuses on companies listed on the Spanish stock exchange, yielding 22 firms with 95 observations. The results show a negative and significant market reaction to the series of announcements. While this reaction intensifies if the fine is ratified, the response becomes positive when the sanction is rectified and annulled. In conclusion, the evidence found allows us to state that the market does in effect penalize corporate misconduct. Furthermore, the public sanction imposed by the competent authority is then followed by a private sanction, which manifests itself as a drop in market value. This is consistent with a hypothetical effect of reputational loss, especially in those cases in which the sanction is more significant in relation to the company’s market value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
26.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Requisite Legal Standard of the Digital Markets Act’s Designation Process Price Effects of Horizontal Mergers: A Retrospective on Retrospectives ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ABUSE OF DOMINANCE PROVISIONS MERGING LAGGARDS The Effective Use of Economics in the EU Digital Markets Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1