在意大利各保护区对地衣的物种-地区关系进行了测试

IF 1.6 4区 生物学 Q4 MYCOLOGY Lichenologist Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1017/s0024282923000488
Gabriele Gheza, Luca Di Nuzzo, Paolo Giordani, Alessandro Chiarucci, Renato Benesperi, Elisabetta Bianchi, Giulia Canali, Luana Francesconi, Chiara Vallese, Juri Nascimbene
{"title":"在意大利各保护区对地衣的物种-地区关系进行了测试","authors":"Gabriele Gheza, Luca Di Nuzzo, Paolo Giordani, Alessandro Chiarucci, Renato Benesperi, Elisabetta Bianchi, Giulia Canali, Luana Francesconi, Chiara Vallese, Juri Nascimbene","doi":"10.1017/s0024282923000488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The species–area relationship (SAR) states that species richness increases with the increase of the sampled area, although other factors can influence the pattern. SARs have been tested on many different organisms, but only rarely on lichens. We aimed to test the SAR, across a wide range of area sizes, for three main substratum-related guilds of lichens, namely epiphytic, epilithic and epigaeic. The test was performed using data from lichen inventories carried out in 44 protected areas of various sizes across Italy. We found a positive correlation of species richness with area size for all three guilds, better fitted by the logarithmic function for epilithic lichens and by the power function for epiphytic and epigaeic lichens. Our results support the fundamental role of area size as the main driver for lichen diversity, suggesting that in an area-based conservation framework, larger protected areas are fundamental to support high lichen species richness. However, finer scale investigations are also required to better elucidate whether and how other environmental factors could interact with area size and modify SAR patterns. Exhaustive lichen inventories could be useful information sources to more robustly test such relationships, and therefore better inform conservation practices.","PeriodicalId":18124,"journal":{"name":"Lichenologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species–area relationship in lichens tested in protected areas across Italy\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Gheza, Luca Di Nuzzo, Paolo Giordani, Alessandro Chiarucci, Renato Benesperi, Elisabetta Bianchi, Giulia Canali, Luana Francesconi, Chiara Vallese, Juri Nascimbene\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0024282923000488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The species–area relationship (SAR) states that species richness increases with the increase of the sampled area, although other factors can influence the pattern. SARs have been tested on many different organisms, but only rarely on lichens. We aimed to test the SAR, across a wide range of area sizes, for three main substratum-related guilds of lichens, namely epiphytic, epilithic and epigaeic. The test was performed using data from lichen inventories carried out in 44 protected areas of various sizes across Italy. We found a positive correlation of species richness with area size for all three guilds, better fitted by the logarithmic function for epilithic lichens and by the power function for epiphytic and epigaeic lichens. Our results support the fundamental role of area size as the main driver for lichen diversity, suggesting that in an area-based conservation framework, larger protected areas are fundamental to support high lichen species richness. However, finer scale investigations are also required to better elucidate whether and how other environmental factors could interact with area size and modify SAR patterns. Exhaustive lichen inventories could be useful information sources to more robustly test such relationships, and therefore better inform conservation practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lichenologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lichenologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0024282923000488\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lichenologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0024282923000488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物种-面积关系(SAR)表明物种丰富度随采样面积的增加而增加,但其他因素也会影响这一格局。SARs已经在许多不同的生物体上进行了测试,但很少在地衣上进行测试。我们的目标是在广泛的面积范围内测试地衣的SAR,用于三种主要的与基质相关的地衣行业,即附生地衣、附生地衣和附生地衣。该测试使用的数据来自意大利44个不同大小的保护区的地衣清单。结果表明,三种地衣的物种丰富度均与面积大小呈正相关,且对附生地衣的对数函数和对附生地衣和附生地衣的幂函数拟合较好。我们的研究结果支持了区域大小作为地衣多样性的主要驱动因素的基本作用,这表明在基于区域的保护框架中,更大的保护区是支持高地衣物种丰富度的基础。然而,还需要更精细的调查来更好地阐明其他环境因素是否以及如何与面积大小相互作用并改变SAR模式。详尽的地衣清单可能是有用的信息来源,可以更有力地测试这种关系,从而更好地为保护实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Species–area relationship in lichens tested in protected areas across Italy
Abstract The species–area relationship (SAR) states that species richness increases with the increase of the sampled area, although other factors can influence the pattern. SARs have been tested on many different organisms, but only rarely on lichens. We aimed to test the SAR, across a wide range of area sizes, for three main substratum-related guilds of lichens, namely epiphytic, epilithic and epigaeic. The test was performed using data from lichen inventories carried out in 44 protected areas of various sizes across Italy. We found a positive correlation of species richness with area size for all three guilds, better fitted by the logarithmic function for epilithic lichens and by the power function for epiphytic and epigaeic lichens. Our results support the fundamental role of area size as the main driver for lichen diversity, suggesting that in an area-based conservation framework, larger protected areas are fundamental to support high lichen species richness. However, finer scale investigations are also required to better elucidate whether and how other environmental factors could interact with area size and modify SAR patterns. Exhaustive lichen inventories could be useful information sources to more robustly test such relationships, and therefore better inform conservation practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lichenologist
Lichenologist 生物-真菌学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The Lichenologist is the premier scientific journal devoted exclusively to the study of lichens worldwide. As the leading forum for the dissemination of new concepts and topical reviews, The Lichenologist reaches more scientists concerned with the study of lichens and lichen symbionts than any other single journal. All aspects of lichenology are considered including systematics and phylogenetics; molecular biology; ultrastructure, anatomy and morphology; secondary chemistry, effects of pollutants and use as bioindicators; biogeography. In addition to standard length research papers, the journal also publishes Short Communications and Book Reviews. A monthly issue may occasionally be devoted to papers deriving from a symposium.
期刊最新文献
A new species of Thelocarpon from Dutch quarries, with a worldwide key to the species of the genus An ecological investigation on lichens and other lithobionts colonizing rock art in Valle Camonica (UNESCO WHS n. 94) addresses preventive conservation strategies Coenogonium nimisii – a new isidiate epiphytic lichen similar to Porina rosei The genus Schaereria Körb. in Australia PhyloKey: a novel method to rapidly and reliably identify species in complex, species-rich genera, and an opportunity for ‘non-molecular museomics’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1