混合效应回归分析语言距离矩阵的有效性:模拟研究

John L.A. Huisman, Roeland van Hout
{"title":"混合效应回归分析语言距离矩阵的有效性:模拟研究","authors":"John L.A. Huisman, Roeland van Hout","doi":"10.5117/tet2023.1.004.huis","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work in dialectometry has proposed the use of linear mixed-effects regression (LMER) for analysing full distance matrices. While the outcomes are promising, work is needed to confirm that such outcomes are valid, given that the analysis of distance matrices using this method is not established. The current contribution provides a supporting framework for this approach by testing its validity through a series of simulated datasets. We analysed the generated data using LMER, and compared its performance to that of the well-established multiple regression on distance matrices (MRM) approach. We find that the LMER results are on par with—and sometimes even exceed—the results obtained from MRM. The potential to include random effects makes LMER a more powerful tool than MRM to examine a linguistic area as a whole, with all pairwise comparisons included, making it an ideal candidate for big data analyses that are becoming more prevalent with the ongoing digitisation of large dialect databases.","PeriodicalId":30675,"journal":{"name":"Taal en Tongval Language Variation in the Low Countries","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The validity of mixed-effects regression for analysing linguistic distance matrices: a simulation study\",\"authors\":\"John L.A. Huisman, Roeland van Hout\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/tet2023.1.004.huis\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent work in dialectometry has proposed the use of linear mixed-effects regression (LMER) for analysing full distance matrices. While the outcomes are promising, work is needed to confirm that such outcomes are valid, given that the analysis of distance matrices using this method is not established. The current contribution provides a supporting framework for this approach by testing its validity through a series of simulated datasets. We analysed the generated data using LMER, and compared its performance to that of the well-established multiple regression on distance matrices (MRM) approach. We find that the LMER results are on par with—and sometimes even exceed—the results obtained from MRM. The potential to include random effects makes LMER a more powerful tool than MRM to examine a linguistic area as a whole, with all pairwise comparisons included, making it an ideal candidate for big data analyses that are becoming more prevalent with the ongoing digitisation of large dialect databases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taal en Tongval Language Variation in the Low Countries\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taal en Tongval Language Variation in the Low Countries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/tet2023.1.004.huis\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taal en Tongval Language Variation in the Low Countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/tet2023.1.004.huis","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近在辩证法方面的工作已经提出使用线性混合效应回归(LMER)来分析全距离矩阵。虽然结果是有希望的,但考虑到使用这种方法分析距离矩阵尚未建立,需要进行工作来确认这些结果是有效的。目前的贡献通过一系列模拟数据集测试了该方法的有效性,为该方法提供了一个支持框架。我们使用LMER分析了生成的数据,并将其性能与已建立的距离矩阵(MRM)方法的性能进行了比较。我们发现LMER的结果与MRM的结果相当,有时甚至超过了MRM的结果。包含随机效应的潜力使LMER成为比MRM更强大的工具,可以从整体上检查语言区域,包括所有成对比较,使其成为大数据分析的理想候选者,随着大型方言数据库的持续数字化,大数据分析正变得越来越普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The validity of mixed-effects regression for analysing linguistic distance matrices: a simulation study
Recent work in dialectometry has proposed the use of linear mixed-effects regression (LMER) for analysing full distance matrices. While the outcomes are promising, work is needed to confirm that such outcomes are valid, given that the analysis of distance matrices using this method is not established. The current contribution provides a supporting framework for this approach by testing its validity through a series of simulated datasets. We analysed the generated data using LMER, and compared its performance to that of the well-established multiple regression on distance matrices (MRM) approach. We find that the LMER results are on par with—and sometimes even exceed—the results obtained from MRM. The potential to include random effects makes LMER a more powerful tool than MRM to examine a linguistic area as a whole, with all pairwise comparisons included, making it an ideal candidate for big data analyses that are becoming more prevalent with the ongoing digitisation of large dialect databases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Historical Corpus of Dutch: A new multi-genre corpus of Early and Late Modern Dutch Big Pimpin’. Een big data-benadering van de verspreiding van het leenwoord pimpen in het Nederlands Sound Change Estimation in Netherlandic Regional Languages: Reducing Inter-Transcriber Variability in Dialect Corpora Big data: New perspectives for research on language variation and change The validity of mixed-effects regression for analysing linguistic distance matrices: a simulation study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1