约鲁巴人土地上的边界纷争:最早的伊泽/埃穆雷危机案例

None Buhari Lateef Oluwafemi
{"title":"约鲁巴人土地上的边界纷争:最早的伊泽/埃穆雷危机案例","authors":"None Buhari Lateef Oluwafemi","doi":"10.33258/polit.v3i1.835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since communities and families held land in trust for all family members, it was determined that individuals did not own any of it. Boundary and territorial disputes often stem from material or cultural claims; sometimes they may also emerge as a result of fundamental changes in domestic environments. The focus of this study is an attempt to consider disputation involvements or experiences of two communities, Ise - Ekiti and Emure Ekiti about land as traditionally conceived. The study found clearly that boundaries created by the colonial government became a problem for Ise and Emure communities who were not satisfied with the British artificial boundary demarcations in Yoruba land. The cases of artificial boundary demarcation had led to communal clashes and destroyed properties between these communities. A combination of historical, descriptive and interpretative methods of data collection and analysis was adopted. The study used both primary and secondary sources. The primary data was sourced through oral interviews. Here, fieldwork was carried out among the people of Ise/ Orun and Emure. The researcher interacted with the prominent chiefs, elders, and women in different categories. Information collected through life experience formed the bedrock of the primary data. Secondary data was generated from various relevant journal articles, newspapers, magazines, textbooks, archival materials, unpublished theses, dissertations, WACA Report and the internet. The study concludes that up till the recent time, the boundary discord between Ise and Emure has mellowed down their cordial relationship. It is important to state that the WACA judgments need to be taken by the supreme court for interpretations.","PeriodicalId":498036,"journal":{"name":"Polit Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boundary Discords in Yoruba Land: A Case of Ise/ Emure Crisis from the Earliest Time\",\"authors\":\"None Buhari Lateef Oluwafemi\",\"doi\":\"10.33258/polit.v3i1.835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since communities and families held land in trust for all family members, it was determined that individuals did not own any of it. Boundary and territorial disputes often stem from material or cultural claims; sometimes they may also emerge as a result of fundamental changes in domestic environments. The focus of this study is an attempt to consider disputation involvements or experiences of two communities, Ise - Ekiti and Emure Ekiti about land as traditionally conceived. The study found clearly that boundaries created by the colonial government became a problem for Ise and Emure communities who were not satisfied with the British artificial boundary demarcations in Yoruba land. The cases of artificial boundary demarcation had led to communal clashes and destroyed properties between these communities. A combination of historical, descriptive and interpretative methods of data collection and analysis was adopted. The study used both primary and secondary sources. The primary data was sourced through oral interviews. Here, fieldwork was carried out among the people of Ise/ Orun and Emure. The researcher interacted with the prominent chiefs, elders, and women in different categories. Information collected through life experience formed the bedrock of the primary data. Secondary data was generated from various relevant journal articles, newspapers, magazines, textbooks, archival materials, unpublished theses, dissertations, WACA Report and the internet. The study concludes that up till the recent time, the boundary discord between Ise and Emure has mellowed down their cordial relationship. It is important to state that the WACA judgments need to be taken by the supreme court for interpretations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":498036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polit Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polit Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33258/polit.v3i1.835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polit Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33258/polit.v3i1.835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于社区和家庭信托所有家庭成员持有土地,因此确定个人不拥有任何土地。边界和领土争端往往源于物质或文化要求;有时,它们也可能由于国内环境的根本变化而出现。本研究的重点是试图考虑伊泽-埃基蒂和埃穆里埃基蒂这两个社区关于传统意义上的土地的争议或经验。研究清楚地发现,殖民政府划定的边界对伊泽和埃穆尔社区来说是一个问题,他们对英国在约鲁巴人土地上划定的人工边界不满意。人为划界的案件导致这些社区之间的社区冲突和财产遭到破坏。采用了历史、描述和解释相结合的数据收集和分析方法。这项研究使用了一手资料和第二手资料。主要数据来源于口头访谈。在这里,实地工作是在伊泽/奥伦和埃穆尔的人们中进行的。研究人员与不同类别的杰出酋长,长老和妇女进行了互动。通过生活经验收集的信息构成了原始数据的基础。辅助数据来源于各种相关的期刊文章、报纸、杂志、教科书、档案资料、未发表的论文、学位论文、WACA报告和互联网。该研究的结论是,直到最近,伊势和爱子之间的边界分歧已经缓和了他们的友好关系。重要的是要指出,WACA的判决需要由最高法院进行解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Boundary Discords in Yoruba Land: A Case of Ise/ Emure Crisis from the Earliest Time
Since communities and families held land in trust for all family members, it was determined that individuals did not own any of it. Boundary and territorial disputes often stem from material or cultural claims; sometimes they may also emerge as a result of fundamental changes in domestic environments. The focus of this study is an attempt to consider disputation involvements or experiences of two communities, Ise - Ekiti and Emure Ekiti about land as traditionally conceived. The study found clearly that boundaries created by the colonial government became a problem for Ise and Emure communities who were not satisfied with the British artificial boundary demarcations in Yoruba land. The cases of artificial boundary demarcation had led to communal clashes and destroyed properties between these communities. A combination of historical, descriptive and interpretative methods of data collection and analysis was adopted. The study used both primary and secondary sources. The primary data was sourced through oral interviews. Here, fieldwork was carried out among the people of Ise/ Orun and Emure. The researcher interacted with the prominent chiefs, elders, and women in different categories. Information collected through life experience formed the bedrock of the primary data. Secondary data was generated from various relevant journal articles, newspapers, magazines, textbooks, archival materials, unpublished theses, dissertations, WACA Report and the internet. The study concludes that up till the recent time, the boundary discord between Ise and Emure has mellowed down their cordial relationship. It is important to state that the WACA judgments need to be taken by the supreme court for interpretations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Normative Analysis of Juvenile Sentencing Laws in Indonesia: Reconciling Justice, Rehabilitation, and Victim Redress Phenomenological Views of Pancasila Perspectives about Democracy The Legal Impact of Merger, Acquisition, and Other Corporate Restructuring Activities on Employment Relationship Based on Labor Law in Indonesia After the Enactment of the Job Creation Law Newspaper Reportage of Cult Related Activities in Emohua Local Government Area of Rivers State The Adequacy of Legal Regulation of Acquisition and Consortium as a Mean of Economic Focus in Jordanian Legislation: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1