有“比勒菲尔德历史学派”吗?七、八十年代的新社会历史计划

Vito Francesco Gironda
{"title":"有“比勒菲尔德历史学派”吗?七、八十年代的新社会历史计划","authors":"Vito Francesco Gironda","doi":"10.52056/9791254693124/11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the basis of unpublished sources, this essay investigates whether between the 1970s and 1980s the group of social historians at Bielefeld University can be considered as a historiographic school. Were the methodological premises, the historiographical practices as well as the scientific production sufficiently distinctive, uniform and influential to talk about a “Bielefeld School“of History? Rather, this case study shows the ways and forms of the international establishment of a specific academic milieu consisting in a cohesive, but not homogeneous network that shared a similar methodological premise, a thematic focus on society and sought to establish the Historische Sozialwissenschaft as a renewal of West German historical science in the field of historians through joint action.","PeriodicalId":29985,"journal":{"name":"Storicamente","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Was there a ‘Bielefeld School of History’? The Project of the New Social History in the 1970s and 1980s\",\"authors\":\"Vito Francesco Gironda\",\"doi\":\"10.52056/9791254693124/11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the basis of unpublished sources, this essay investigates whether between the 1970s and 1980s the group of social historians at Bielefeld University can be considered as a historiographic school. Were the methodological premises, the historiographical practices as well as the scientific production sufficiently distinctive, uniform and influential to talk about a “Bielefeld School“of History? Rather, this case study shows the ways and forms of the international establishment of a specific academic milieu consisting in a cohesive, but not homogeneous network that shared a similar methodological premise, a thematic focus on society and sought to establish the Historische Sozialwissenschaft as a renewal of West German historical science in the field of historians through joint action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Storicamente\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Storicamente\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52056/9791254693124/11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Storicamente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52056/9791254693124/11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在未发表资料的基础上,调查了在20世纪70年代至80年代之间,比勒费尔德大学的社会历史学家群体是否可以被视为一个史学学派。方法论前提,史学实践以及科学成果是否足够独特,统一和有影响力来谈论历史的“比勒菲尔德学派”?相反,本案例研究显示了国际建立特定学术环境的方式和形式,该环境由一个有凝聚力但不同质的网络组成,该网络共享类似的方法论前提,主题关注社会,并试图通过联合行动建立历史学家领域的西德历史科学的更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Was there a ‘Bielefeld School of History’? The Project of the New Social History in the 1970s and 1980s
On the basis of unpublished sources, this essay investigates whether between the 1970s and 1980s the group of social historians at Bielefeld University can be considered as a historiographic school. Were the methodological premises, the historiographical practices as well as the scientific production sufficiently distinctive, uniform and influential to talk about a “Bielefeld School“of History? Rather, this case study shows the ways and forms of the international establishment of a specific academic milieu consisting in a cohesive, but not homogeneous network that shared a similar methodological premise, a thematic focus on society and sought to establish the Historische Sozialwissenschaft as a renewal of West German historical science in the field of historians through joint action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
How to Write History? Le “quasi” due vite del sociologo Camillo Pellizzi Francesca Trivellato, “Ebrei e capitalismo” Valentine Lomellini, “Il «lodo Moro»” Biografia di un intellettuale nell’Europa del Novecento. Una introduzione
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1