{"title":"《一战时期的国际犹太人人道主义》作者:杰奎琳·格兰尼克(书评)","authors":"Sara Halpern","doi":"10.1353/ajs.2023.a911544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War by Jaclyn Granick Sara Halpern Jaclyn Granick. International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 418 pp. My step-grandfather, who directed the JDC’s (American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee) Jerusalem office, once told me: “The JDC went to help the Jews in Europe during World War I and then it was going to get out of business. Then there were crises in the 1920s, so the JDC stayed to solve those and then it’d get out of business. That didn’t happen. It’s been a hundred years and it’s still in business!” His words echo Jaclyn Granick’s meticulous research in her International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War. This book chronicles how American Jewish organizations, the JDC especially, expanded and transformed their philanthropic work overseas between 1914 and 1929. In contrast to non-sectarian American counterparts such as the American Relief Association (ARA) and American Red Cross, American Jewish organizations’ ethnic and religious ties to Jewish beneficiaries in east central Europe, the Soviet Union, and Palestine complicated their departure after 1921. They lingered via philanthropy, credit lending, loans, and advising in social and medical welfare. Granick argues that their leaders regarded American Progressive values and practices as superior to Western European ideas of solving the “Jewish question” in those regions. This proposition also worked as both complementary and antithetical to Zionism, which Granick tenaciously illustrates. Conversely, Jewish participation in social and economic welfare widens the interpretation of “humanitarianism” beyond Christian and nonsectarian frameworks in the United States and Western Europe. The book’s chapter structures betray seemingly infinite moving parts in the planning and execution of humanitarian work as American Jews sought to import social scientific expertise and formalize relationships with surviving Jewish communities and organizations. The targeted population numbered seven million, making their “scale, ambition, modern sophistication, and institutional insurance” [End Page 476] (26) unprecedented in the history of Jewish institutions. With rich evidence from twenty archives and five languages in four countries and an impressive synthesis of national studies, Granick argues that American Jewish humanitarian concerns for Jews in Europe and Palestine as an institution occurred “a full generation earlier” than acknowledged (20). American Jews engaged with the State Department and multiple Jewish and international financial networks to assist Jewish victims of the Great War for the first time. The introduction of Progressivism and rehabilitation as a path to self-sufficiency marked a clear departure from the European path in the historiography of Jewish solidarity and participation in imperialism. Yet it did not mean that American Jewish humanitarians happily sojourned to feed the hungry and become saviors. Rather, they confronted, as one JDC worker described, “a calamity of stupendous proportions” (2). Against the backdrop of continued public resistance to the United States’s global engagement, American Jewish organizations began negotiating with the State Department in the realms of foreign policy and empire-building to be able to carry out their mission. To be clear, Granick investigates how American Jewish organizations, especially the JDC, employed soft power in communities abroad by exporting Progressivist values and culture in the provision of food, vocational training, and medical care. By adapting American models to local communities’ culture and needs and promoting Jewish solidarity, they hoped that this approach to modernity would stabilize Jewish futures in vulnerable parts of the Diaspora. The book explores the years of the American “project of collectivist Jewish welfarism” (19). In chapter 1, Granick delves into the JDC’s bureaucratic structures that enabled it to appear “state-like” and draw criticisms of micromanagement from beneficiaries (21). This discussion maps how uptown Jewish bankers cultivated relationships inside the State Department to cross enemy lines and utilized European Jewish financial networks for distribution of funds and supplies. In chapter 2, the focus shifts to (borrowing Peter Gatrell’s words) the consequences of how “the Great War rendered Jews as a whole diaspora walking” as empires collapsed (6). The JDC and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) reengineered their road maps for emergency relief to align with nonsectarian American organizations and the American Friends...","PeriodicalId":54106,"journal":{"name":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","volume":"23 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War by Jaclyn Granick (review)\",\"authors\":\"Sara Halpern\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ajs.2023.a911544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War by Jaclyn Granick Sara Halpern Jaclyn Granick. International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 418 pp. My step-grandfather, who directed the JDC’s (American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee) Jerusalem office, once told me: “The JDC went to help the Jews in Europe during World War I and then it was going to get out of business. Then there were crises in the 1920s, so the JDC stayed to solve those and then it’d get out of business. That didn’t happen. It’s been a hundred years and it’s still in business!” His words echo Jaclyn Granick’s meticulous research in her International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War. This book chronicles how American Jewish organizations, the JDC especially, expanded and transformed their philanthropic work overseas between 1914 and 1929. In contrast to non-sectarian American counterparts such as the American Relief Association (ARA) and American Red Cross, American Jewish organizations’ ethnic and religious ties to Jewish beneficiaries in east central Europe, the Soviet Union, and Palestine complicated their departure after 1921. They lingered via philanthropy, credit lending, loans, and advising in social and medical welfare. Granick argues that their leaders regarded American Progressive values and practices as superior to Western European ideas of solving the “Jewish question” in those regions. This proposition also worked as both complementary and antithetical to Zionism, which Granick tenaciously illustrates. Conversely, Jewish participation in social and economic welfare widens the interpretation of “humanitarianism” beyond Christian and nonsectarian frameworks in the United States and Western Europe. The book’s chapter structures betray seemingly infinite moving parts in the planning and execution of humanitarian work as American Jews sought to import social scientific expertise and formalize relationships with surviving Jewish communities and organizations. The targeted population numbered seven million, making their “scale, ambition, modern sophistication, and institutional insurance” [End Page 476] (26) unprecedented in the history of Jewish institutions. With rich evidence from twenty archives and five languages in four countries and an impressive synthesis of national studies, Granick argues that American Jewish humanitarian concerns for Jews in Europe and Palestine as an institution occurred “a full generation earlier” than acknowledged (20). American Jews engaged with the State Department and multiple Jewish and international financial networks to assist Jewish victims of the Great War for the first time. The introduction of Progressivism and rehabilitation as a path to self-sufficiency marked a clear departure from the European path in the historiography of Jewish solidarity and participation in imperialism. Yet it did not mean that American Jewish humanitarians happily sojourned to feed the hungry and become saviors. Rather, they confronted, as one JDC worker described, “a calamity of stupendous proportions” (2). Against the backdrop of continued public resistance to the United States’s global engagement, American Jewish organizations began negotiating with the State Department in the realms of foreign policy and empire-building to be able to carry out their mission. To be clear, Granick investigates how American Jewish organizations, especially the JDC, employed soft power in communities abroad by exporting Progressivist values and culture in the provision of food, vocational training, and medical care. By adapting American models to local communities’ culture and needs and promoting Jewish solidarity, they hoped that this approach to modernity would stabilize Jewish futures in vulnerable parts of the Diaspora. The book explores the years of the American “project of collectivist Jewish welfarism” (19). In chapter 1, Granick delves into the JDC’s bureaucratic structures that enabled it to appear “state-like” and draw criticisms of micromanagement from beneficiaries (21). This discussion maps how uptown Jewish bankers cultivated relationships inside the State Department to cross enemy lines and utilized European Jewish financial networks for distribution of funds and supplies. In chapter 2, the focus shifts to (borrowing Peter Gatrell’s words) the consequences of how “the Great War rendered Jews as a whole diaspora walking” as empires collapsed (6). The JDC and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) reengineered their road maps for emergency relief to align with nonsectarian American organizations and the American Friends...\",\"PeriodicalId\":54106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies\",\"volume\":\"23 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2023.a911544\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2023.a911544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
书评:《一战时期的国际犹太人人道主义》作者:杰奎琳·格兰尼克。一战时期的国际犹太人人道主义。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2021。我的继祖父是JDC(美国犹太人联合分配委员会)耶路撒冷办事处的负责人,他曾经告诉我:“第一次世界大战期间,JDC去帮助欧洲的犹太人,然后它就要倒闭了。然后在20世纪20年代出现了危机,所以JDC留下来解决这些问题,然后它就倒闭了。但这并没有发生。已经100年了,它还在营业!”他的话呼应了杰奎琳·格兰尼克在她的《一战时期的国际犹太人人道主义》一书中细致的研究。这本书记录了1914年至1929年间,美国犹太组织,尤其是犹太共同委员会,是如何扩展和转变他们在海外的慈善工作的。与美国救济协会(ARA)和美国红十字会(American Red Cross)等非宗派的美国同类组织不同,美国犹太组织与东欧、苏联和巴勒斯坦的犹太人受益人在种族和宗教上的联系使他们在1921年后的离开变得更加复杂。他们通过慈善事业、信用贷款、贷款以及在社会和医疗福利方面提供咨询而徘徊。格兰尼克认为,他们的领导人认为美国进步主义的价值观和做法优于西欧解决这些地区“犹太人问题”的理念。这一主张也起到了补充和反对犹太复国主义的作用,格拉尼克顽强地说明了这一点。相反,犹太人参与社会和经济福利扩大了对“人道主义”的解释,超出了美国和西欧的基督教和非宗派框架。这本书的章节结构暴露了在人道主义工作的规划和执行中看似无限的活动部分,因为美国犹太人试图引进社会科学专业知识,并与幸存的犹太社区和组织建立正式关系。目标人口达到700万,这使得他们的“规模、野心、现代复杂性和制度保障”(End Page 476)在犹太机构的历史上前所未有。根据来自四个国家的二十份档案和五种语言的丰富证据,以及令人印象深刻的民族研究综合,格兰尼克认为,美国犹太人对欧洲和巴勒斯坦犹太人的人道主义关怀作为一个机构,比人们所承认的“早了整整一代人”(20)。美国犹太人首次与国务院以及多个犹太和国际金融网络合作,帮助第一次世界大战的犹太受害者。进步主义和复兴作为自给自足之路的引入,标志着犹太人团结和参与帝国主义的欧洲历史道路的明显背离。然而,这并不意味着美国犹太人道主义者会愉快地旅居他乡,为饥民提供食物,成为救世主。相反,他们面对的是,正如一位犹太犹太人委员会的工作人员所描述的那样,“一场规模巨大的灾难”(2)。在公众持续抵制美国参与全球事务的背景下,美国犹太组织开始与国务院就外交政策和帝国建设领域进行谈判,以便能够执行他们的使命。明确地说,格兰尼克调查了美国犹太人组织,特别是犹太共同委员会,如何通过输出进步主义价值观和文化,在提供食品、职业培训和医疗保健方面,在海外社区运用软实力。通过使美国模式适应当地社区的文化和需求,并促进犹太人的团结,他们希望这种现代化的方式能够稳定散居在脆弱地区的犹太人的未来。这本书探讨了多年来美国“集体主义犹太福利主义计划”(19)。在第一章中,Granick深入研究了JDC的官僚结构,这使得它看起来像“国家”,并引起了受益者对微观管理的批评(21)。这个讨论描绘了上城区的犹太银行家如何在国务院内部建立关系,越过敌线,并利用欧洲犹太人的金融网络来分配资金和物资。在第二章中,重点转移到(借用Peter Gatrell的话)随着帝国的崩溃,“第一次世界大战使犹太人成为一个整体的散居者”的后果(6)。JDC和希伯来移民援助协会(HIAS)重新设计了他们的紧急救援路线图,以与非宗派的美国组织和美国之友保持一致……
International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War by Jaclyn Granick (review)
Reviewed by: International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War by Jaclyn Granick Sara Halpern Jaclyn Granick. International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 418 pp. My step-grandfather, who directed the JDC’s (American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee) Jerusalem office, once told me: “The JDC went to help the Jews in Europe during World War I and then it was going to get out of business. Then there were crises in the 1920s, so the JDC stayed to solve those and then it’d get out of business. That didn’t happen. It’s been a hundred years and it’s still in business!” His words echo Jaclyn Granick’s meticulous research in her International Jewish Humanitarianism in the Age of the Great War. This book chronicles how American Jewish organizations, the JDC especially, expanded and transformed their philanthropic work overseas between 1914 and 1929. In contrast to non-sectarian American counterparts such as the American Relief Association (ARA) and American Red Cross, American Jewish organizations’ ethnic and religious ties to Jewish beneficiaries in east central Europe, the Soviet Union, and Palestine complicated their departure after 1921. They lingered via philanthropy, credit lending, loans, and advising in social and medical welfare. Granick argues that their leaders regarded American Progressive values and practices as superior to Western European ideas of solving the “Jewish question” in those regions. This proposition also worked as both complementary and antithetical to Zionism, which Granick tenaciously illustrates. Conversely, Jewish participation in social and economic welfare widens the interpretation of “humanitarianism” beyond Christian and nonsectarian frameworks in the United States and Western Europe. The book’s chapter structures betray seemingly infinite moving parts in the planning and execution of humanitarian work as American Jews sought to import social scientific expertise and formalize relationships with surviving Jewish communities and organizations. The targeted population numbered seven million, making their “scale, ambition, modern sophistication, and institutional insurance” [End Page 476] (26) unprecedented in the history of Jewish institutions. With rich evidence from twenty archives and five languages in four countries and an impressive synthesis of national studies, Granick argues that American Jewish humanitarian concerns for Jews in Europe and Palestine as an institution occurred “a full generation earlier” than acknowledged (20). American Jews engaged with the State Department and multiple Jewish and international financial networks to assist Jewish victims of the Great War for the first time. The introduction of Progressivism and rehabilitation as a path to self-sufficiency marked a clear departure from the European path in the historiography of Jewish solidarity and participation in imperialism. Yet it did not mean that American Jewish humanitarians happily sojourned to feed the hungry and become saviors. Rather, they confronted, as one JDC worker described, “a calamity of stupendous proportions” (2). Against the backdrop of continued public resistance to the United States’s global engagement, American Jewish organizations began negotiating with the State Department in the realms of foreign policy and empire-building to be able to carry out their mission. To be clear, Granick investigates how American Jewish organizations, especially the JDC, employed soft power in communities abroad by exporting Progressivist values and culture in the provision of food, vocational training, and medical care. By adapting American models to local communities’ culture and needs and promoting Jewish solidarity, they hoped that this approach to modernity would stabilize Jewish futures in vulnerable parts of the Diaspora. The book explores the years of the American “project of collectivist Jewish welfarism” (19). In chapter 1, Granick delves into the JDC’s bureaucratic structures that enabled it to appear “state-like” and draw criticisms of micromanagement from beneficiaries (21). This discussion maps how uptown Jewish bankers cultivated relationships inside the State Department to cross enemy lines and utilized European Jewish financial networks for distribution of funds and supplies. In chapter 2, the focus shifts to (borrowing Peter Gatrell’s words) the consequences of how “the Great War rendered Jews as a whole diaspora walking” as empires collapsed (6). The JDC and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) reengineered their road maps for emergency relief to align with nonsectarian American organizations and the American Friends...