Barbara Valle , Mauro Gobbi , Mattia Brambilla , Marina Serena Borgatti , Marco Caccianiga
{"title":"题目:寻找冰川岩石层中弹尾群落(六足目:弹尾纲)定量采样的最佳策略","authors":"Barbara Valle , Mauro Gobbi , Mattia Brambilla , Marina Serena Borgatti , Marco Caccianiga","doi":"10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) play a key role in biological community in glacial ecosystems and represent important ecological indicators in such threatened habitats. An effective sampling protocol for springtail community that optimizes sampling effort in the peculiar conditions of glacial lithosols is not available. We tested three sampling methods on the Sforzellina glacier (Central Italian Alps) in 21 sampling points. For each sampling point, we performed: 1. Tullgren funnels; 2. Flotation method; 3. Pitfall trapping. The potential effect of different sampling methods on species detection was evaluated by ANOVA and by N-mixture models for Flotation method and Tullgren funnels. The incidence coverage estimator (ICE) was used to test the performance of each sampling method comparing the observed vs estimated species richness. Our analysis showed that the sampling method affected the number of species and individuals recorded. Tullgren funnels collected the highest number of species, pitfall trapping the highest average number of species, but did not detect soil species. The observed/estimated species ratio was higher for pitfall trapping and Tullgren funnels than for flotation. The combination of pitfall trapping with Tullgren funnels or flotation method resulted optimal in terms of number of species and functional types recorded. Flotation method collected more than twice the number of specimens obtained with Tullgren, indicating a higher ability to extract springtails from mineral soil. Flotation method and Tullgren funnels detected the same community, from a functional point of view, but only flotation method collected all the most abundant species. These results indicate that a combination of pitfall trapping and flotation should be evaluated in order to maximize the obtained information in terms of specie assemblage composition and functional categories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49711,"journal":{"name":"Pedobiologia","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 150914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405623079829/pdfft?md5=81ba29ee72675de455f44d029443076b&pid=1-s2.0-S0031405623079829-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding the optimal strategy for quantitative sampling of springtails community (Hexapoda: Collembola) in glacial lithosols\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Valle , Mauro Gobbi , Mattia Brambilla , Marina Serena Borgatti , Marco Caccianiga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) play a key role in biological community in glacial ecosystems and represent important ecological indicators in such threatened habitats. An effective sampling protocol for springtail community that optimizes sampling effort in the peculiar conditions of glacial lithosols is not available. We tested three sampling methods on the Sforzellina glacier (Central Italian Alps) in 21 sampling points. For each sampling point, we performed: 1. Tullgren funnels; 2. Flotation method; 3. Pitfall trapping. The potential effect of different sampling methods on species detection was evaluated by ANOVA and by N-mixture models for Flotation method and Tullgren funnels. The incidence coverage estimator (ICE) was used to test the performance of each sampling method comparing the observed vs estimated species richness. Our analysis showed that the sampling method affected the number of species and individuals recorded. Tullgren funnels collected the highest number of species, pitfall trapping the highest average number of species, but did not detect soil species. The observed/estimated species ratio was higher for pitfall trapping and Tullgren funnels than for flotation. The combination of pitfall trapping with Tullgren funnels or flotation method resulted optimal in terms of number of species and functional types recorded. Flotation method collected more than twice the number of specimens obtained with Tullgren, indicating a higher ability to extract springtails from mineral soil. Flotation method and Tullgren funnels detected the same community, from a functional point of view, but only flotation method collected all the most abundant species. These results indicate that a combination of pitfall trapping and flotation should be evaluated in order to maximize the obtained information in terms of specie assemblage composition and functional categories.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedobiologia\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 150914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405623079829/pdfft?md5=81ba29ee72675de455f44d029443076b&pid=1-s2.0-S0031405623079829-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedobiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405623079829\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405623079829","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Finding the optimal strategy for quantitative sampling of springtails community (Hexapoda: Collembola) in glacial lithosols
Springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) play a key role in biological community in glacial ecosystems and represent important ecological indicators in such threatened habitats. An effective sampling protocol for springtail community that optimizes sampling effort in the peculiar conditions of glacial lithosols is not available. We tested three sampling methods on the Sforzellina glacier (Central Italian Alps) in 21 sampling points. For each sampling point, we performed: 1. Tullgren funnels; 2. Flotation method; 3. Pitfall trapping. The potential effect of different sampling methods on species detection was evaluated by ANOVA and by N-mixture models for Flotation method and Tullgren funnels. The incidence coverage estimator (ICE) was used to test the performance of each sampling method comparing the observed vs estimated species richness. Our analysis showed that the sampling method affected the number of species and individuals recorded. Tullgren funnels collected the highest number of species, pitfall trapping the highest average number of species, but did not detect soil species. The observed/estimated species ratio was higher for pitfall trapping and Tullgren funnels than for flotation. The combination of pitfall trapping with Tullgren funnels or flotation method resulted optimal in terms of number of species and functional types recorded. Flotation method collected more than twice the number of specimens obtained with Tullgren, indicating a higher ability to extract springtails from mineral soil. Flotation method and Tullgren funnels detected the same community, from a functional point of view, but only flotation method collected all the most abundant species. These results indicate that a combination of pitfall trapping and flotation should be evaluated in order to maximize the obtained information in terms of specie assemblage composition and functional categories.
期刊介绍:
Pedobiologia publishes peer reviewed articles describing original work in the field of soil ecology, which includes the study of soil organisms and their interactions with factors in their biotic and abiotic environments.
Analysis of biological structures, interactions, functions, and processes in soil is fundamental for understanding the dynamical nature of terrestrial ecosystems, a prerequisite for appropriate soil management. The scope of this journal consists of fundamental and applied aspects of soil ecology; key focal points include interactions among organisms in soil, organismal controls on soil processes, causes and consequences of soil biodiversity, and aboveground-belowground interactions.
We publish:
original research that tests clearly defined hypotheses addressing topics of current interest in soil ecology (including studies demonstrating nonsignificant effects);
descriptions of novel methodological approaches, or evaluations of current approaches, that address a clear need in soil ecology research;
innovative syntheses of the soil ecology literature, including metaanalyses, topical in depth reviews and short opinion/perspective pieces, and descriptions of original conceptual frameworks; and
short notes reporting novel observations of ecological significance.