{"title":"二值神经网络硬件效率的量化与优化","authors":"Geng Yang, Jie Lei, Zhenman Fang, Yunsong li, Jiaqing Zhang, Weiying Xie","doi":"10.1145/3631610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Binary neural network (BNN), where both the weight and the activation values are represented with one bit, provides an attractive alternative to deploy highly efficient deep learning inference on resource-constrained edge devices. However, our investigation reveals that, to achieve satisfactory accuracy gains, state-of-the-art (SOTA) BNNs, such as FracBNN and ReActNet, usually have to incorporate various auxiliary floating-point components and increase the model size, which in turn degrades the hardware performance efficiency. In this paper, we aim to quantify such hardware inefficiency in SOTA BNNs and further mitigate it with negligible accuracy loss. First, we observe that the auxiliary floating-point (AFP) components consume an average of 93% DSPs, 46% LUTs, and 62% FFs, among the entire BNN accelerator resource utilization. To mitigate such overhead, we propose a novel algorithm-hardware co-design, called FuseBNN , to fuse those AFP operators without hurting the accuracy. On average, FuseBNN reduces AFP resource utilization to 59% DSPs, 13% LUTs, and 16% FFs. Second, SOTA BNNs often use the compact MobileNetV1 as the backbone network but have to replace the lightweight 3 × 3 depth-wise convolution (DWC) with the 3 × 3 standard convolution (SC, e.g., in ReActNet and our ReActNet-adapted BaseBNN) or even more complex fractional 3 × 3 SC (e.g., in FracBNN) to bridge the accuracy gap. As a result, the model parameter size is significantly increased and becomes 2.25 × larger than that of the 4-bit direct quantization with the original DWC (4-Bit-Net); the number of multiply-accumulate operations is also significantly increased so that the overall LUT resource usage of BaseBNN is almost the same as that of 4-Bit-Net. To address this issue, we propose HyBNN , where we binarize depth-wise separation convolution (DSC) blocks for the first time to decrease the model size and incorporate 4-bit DSC blocks to compensate for the accuracy loss. For the ship detection task in synthetic aperture radar imagery on the AMD-Xilinx ZCU102 FPGA, HyBNN achieves a detection accuracy of 94.8% and a detection speed of 615 frames per second (FPS), which is 6.8 × faster than FuseBNN+ (94.9% accuracy) and 2.7 × faster than 4-Bit-Net (95.9% accuracy). For image classification on the CIFAR-10 dataset on the AMD-Xilinx Ultra96-V2 FPGA, HyBNN achieves 1.5 × speedup and 0.7% better accuracy over SOTA FracBNN.","PeriodicalId":49248,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems","volume":"279 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HyBNN: Quantifying and Optimizing Hardware Efficiency of Binary Neural Networks\",\"authors\":\"Geng Yang, Jie Lei, Zhenman Fang, Yunsong li, Jiaqing Zhang, Weiying Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3631610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Binary neural network (BNN), where both the weight and the activation values are represented with one bit, provides an attractive alternative to deploy highly efficient deep learning inference on resource-constrained edge devices. However, our investigation reveals that, to achieve satisfactory accuracy gains, state-of-the-art (SOTA) BNNs, such as FracBNN and ReActNet, usually have to incorporate various auxiliary floating-point components and increase the model size, which in turn degrades the hardware performance efficiency. In this paper, we aim to quantify such hardware inefficiency in SOTA BNNs and further mitigate it with negligible accuracy loss. First, we observe that the auxiliary floating-point (AFP) components consume an average of 93% DSPs, 46% LUTs, and 62% FFs, among the entire BNN accelerator resource utilization. To mitigate such overhead, we propose a novel algorithm-hardware co-design, called FuseBNN , to fuse those AFP operators without hurting the accuracy. On average, FuseBNN reduces AFP resource utilization to 59% DSPs, 13% LUTs, and 16% FFs. Second, SOTA BNNs often use the compact MobileNetV1 as the backbone network but have to replace the lightweight 3 × 3 depth-wise convolution (DWC) with the 3 × 3 standard convolution (SC, e.g., in ReActNet and our ReActNet-adapted BaseBNN) or even more complex fractional 3 × 3 SC (e.g., in FracBNN) to bridge the accuracy gap. As a result, the model parameter size is significantly increased and becomes 2.25 × larger than that of the 4-bit direct quantization with the original DWC (4-Bit-Net); the number of multiply-accumulate operations is also significantly increased so that the overall LUT resource usage of BaseBNN is almost the same as that of 4-Bit-Net. To address this issue, we propose HyBNN , where we binarize depth-wise separation convolution (DSC) blocks for the first time to decrease the model size and incorporate 4-bit DSC blocks to compensate for the accuracy loss. For the ship detection task in synthetic aperture radar imagery on the AMD-Xilinx ZCU102 FPGA, HyBNN achieves a detection accuracy of 94.8% and a detection speed of 615 frames per second (FPS), which is 6.8 × faster than FuseBNN+ (94.9% accuracy) and 2.7 × faster than 4-Bit-Net (95.9% accuracy). For image classification on the CIFAR-10 dataset on the AMD-Xilinx Ultra96-V2 FPGA, HyBNN achieves 1.5 × speedup and 0.7% better accuracy over SOTA FracBNN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems\",\"volume\":\"279 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3631610\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3631610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
HyBNN: Quantifying and Optimizing Hardware Efficiency of Binary Neural Networks
Binary neural network (BNN), where both the weight and the activation values are represented with one bit, provides an attractive alternative to deploy highly efficient deep learning inference on resource-constrained edge devices. However, our investigation reveals that, to achieve satisfactory accuracy gains, state-of-the-art (SOTA) BNNs, such as FracBNN and ReActNet, usually have to incorporate various auxiliary floating-point components and increase the model size, which in turn degrades the hardware performance efficiency. In this paper, we aim to quantify such hardware inefficiency in SOTA BNNs and further mitigate it with negligible accuracy loss. First, we observe that the auxiliary floating-point (AFP) components consume an average of 93% DSPs, 46% LUTs, and 62% FFs, among the entire BNN accelerator resource utilization. To mitigate such overhead, we propose a novel algorithm-hardware co-design, called FuseBNN , to fuse those AFP operators without hurting the accuracy. On average, FuseBNN reduces AFP resource utilization to 59% DSPs, 13% LUTs, and 16% FFs. Second, SOTA BNNs often use the compact MobileNetV1 as the backbone network but have to replace the lightweight 3 × 3 depth-wise convolution (DWC) with the 3 × 3 standard convolution (SC, e.g., in ReActNet and our ReActNet-adapted BaseBNN) or even more complex fractional 3 × 3 SC (e.g., in FracBNN) to bridge the accuracy gap. As a result, the model parameter size is significantly increased and becomes 2.25 × larger than that of the 4-bit direct quantization with the original DWC (4-Bit-Net); the number of multiply-accumulate operations is also significantly increased so that the overall LUT resource usage of BaseBNN is almost the same as that of 4-Bit-Net. To address this issue, we propose HyBNN , where we binarize depth-wise separation convolution (DSC) blocks for the first time to decrease the model size and incorporate 4-bit DSC blocks to compensate for the accuracy loss. For the ship detection task in synthetic aperture radar imagery on the AMD-Xilinx ZCU102 FPGA, HyBNN achieves a detection accuracy of 94.8% and a detection speed of 615 frames per second (FPS), which is 6.8 × faster than FuseBNN+ (94.9% accuracy) and 2.7 × faster than 4-Bit-Net (95.9% accuracy). For image classification on the CIFAR-10 dataset on the AMD-Xilinx Ultra96-V2 FPGA, HyBNN achieves 1.5 × speedup and 0.7% better accuracy over SOTA FracBNN.
期刊介绍:
TRETS is the top journal focusing on research in, on, and with reconfigurable systems and on their underlying technology. The scope, rationale, and coverage by other journals are often limited to particular aspects of reconfigurable technology or reconfigurable systems. TRETS is a journal that covers reconfigurability in its own right.
Topics that would be appropriate for TRETS would include all levels of reconfigurable system abstractions and all aspects of reconfigurable technology including platforms, programming environments and application successes that support these systems for computing or other applications.
-The board and systems architectures of a reconfigurable platform.
-Programming environments of reconfigurable systems, especially those designed for use with reconfigurable systems that will lead to increased programmer productivity.
-Languages and compilers for reconfigurable systems.
-Logic synthesis and related tools, as they relate to reconfigurable systems.
-Applications on which success can be demonstrated.
The underlying technology from which reconfigurable systems are developed. (Currently this technology is that of FPGAs, but research on the nature and use of follow-on technologies is appropriate for TRETS.)
In considering whether a paper is suitable for TRETS, the foremost question should be whether reconfigurability has been essential to success. Topics such as architecture, programming languages, compilers, and environments, logic synthesis, and high performance applications are all suitable if the context is appropriate. For example, an architecture for an embedded application that happens to use FPGAs is not necessarily suitable for TRETS, but an architecture using FPGAs for which the reconfigurability of the FPGAs is an inherent part of the specifications (perhaps due to a need for re-use on multiple applications) would be appropriate for TRETS.