我们在中风中使用rTMS的经验

Pawan T. Ojha, Abhijit Gaikwad, Sumit Kharat, Nishu Ojha, Shashank Nagendra, Jayendra Yadav, Aamna Maniyar
{"title":"我们在中风中使用rTMS的经验","authors":"Pawan T. Ojha, Abhijit Gaikwad, Sumit Kharat, Nishu Ojha, Shashank Nagendra, Jayendra Yadav, Aamna Maniyar","doi":"10.1177/25166085231207606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (r-TMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation method, appears promising in augmenting post-stroke recovery and requires further evaluation. Aims and Objective To study the effect of r-TMS treatment on motor function in patients with strokes of different duration and types. Methods A prospective, single center study was conducted to study the effect of bilateral motor cortex rTMS treatment in 100 consecutive patients with either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke of any duration. Measured outcomes were changes in NIHSS, MRC grading for motor power, MAS (modified Ashworth scale) for spasticity and mRS (modified Rankin Score) from baseline to follow-up visit at 90 days. Paired T test was used for comparing the outcomes. Results 77% subjects were males, 82% had ischemic stroke, median age was 58.5 years, and median NIHSS score was 11. We observed favorable changes in outcome measures after treatment. mRS < = 2 at 90 days was observed in 85.71% of patients with acute stroke, 64.51% of subacute and 55.88% of chronic strokes (p value < 0.002). Acute stroke had higher rates of limb power improvement (94.28%) than subacute (70.96%) or chronic strokes (41.17%) (p value = < 0.01). Post-stroke spasticity reduction was also observed after rTMS. Patients with infarcts or hemorrhages had no significant differences. No significant adverse events were seen. Conclusion rTMS appears to be safe in our study population and could be effectively delivered at different time points to augment post-stroke motor recovery.","PeriodicalId":93323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of stroke medicine","volume":"280 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Our Experience with rTMS in a Stroke\",\"authors\":\"Pawan T. Ojha, Abhijit Gaikwad, Sumit Kharat, Nishu Ojha, Shashank Nagendra, Jayendra Yadav, Aamna Maniyar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25166085231207606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (r-TMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation method, appears promising in augmenting post-stroke recovery and requires further evaluation. Aims and Objective To study the effect of r-TMS treatment on motor function in patients with strokes of different duration and types. Methods A prospective, single center study was conducted to study the effect of bilateral motor cortex rTMS treatment in 100 consecutive patients with either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke of any duration. Measured outcomes were changes in NIHSS, MRC grading for motor power, MAS (modified Ashworth scale) for spasticity and mRS (modified Rankin Score) from baseline to follow-up visit at 90 days. Paired T test was used for comparing the outcomes. Results 77% subjects were males, 82% had ischemic stroke, median age was 58.5 years, and median NIHSS score was 11. We observed favorable changes in outcome measures after treatment. mRS < = 2 at 90 days was observed in 85.71% of patients with acute stroke, 64.51% of subacute and 55.88% of chronic strokes (p value < 0.002). Acute stroke had higher rates of limb power improvement (94.28%) than subacute (70.96%) or chronic strokes (41.17%) (p value = < 0.01). Post-stroke spasticity reduction was also observed after rTMS. Patients with infarcts or hemorrhages had no significant differences. No significant adverse events were seen. Conclusion rTMS appears to be safe in our study population and could be effectively delivered at different time points to augment post-stroke motor recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of stroke medicine\",\"volume\":\"280 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of stroke medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25166085231207606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of stroke medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25166085231207606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重复性经颅磁刺激(r-TMS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激方法,有望增强脑卒中后的恢复,但需要进一步评估。目的探讨经颅磁刺激对不同病程、不同类型脑卒中患者运动功能的影响。方法采用前瞻性单中心研究方法,对连续100例缺血性或出血性脑卒中患者进行双侧运动皮质rTMS治疗的效果进行研究。测量结果是NIHSS、MRC运动功率评分、MAS(改良Ashworth评分)痉挛和mRS(改良Rankin评分)从基线到随访90天的变化。结果比较采用配对T检验。结果77%为男性,82%为缺血性脑卒中,中位年龄为58.5岁,NIHSS中位评分为11分。我们观察到治疗后结局指标的有利变化。夫人& lt;85.71%的急性脑卒中患者、64.51%的亚急性脑卒中患者和55.88%的慢性脑卒中患者在90天观察到= 2的差异(p值<0.002)。急性脑卒中患者肢体力量改善率(94.28%)高于亚急性脑卒中患者(70.96%)和慢性脑卒中患者(41.17%)(p值= <0.01)。在rTMS后也观察到卒中后痉挛减少。梗死或出血患者无显著差异。未见明显不良事件。结论rTMS在我们的研究人群中是安全的,可以在不同的时间点有效地进行,以增强脑卒中后的运动恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Our Experience with rTMS in a Stroke
Background Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (r-TMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation method, appears promising in augmenting post-stroke recovery and requires further evaluation. Aims and Objective To study the effect of r-TMS treatment on motor function in patients with strokes of different duration and types. Methods A prospective, single center study was conducted to study the effect of bilateral motor cortex rTMS treatment in 100 consecutive patients with either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke of any duration. Measured outcomes were changes in NIHSS, MRC grading for motor power, MAS (modified Ashworth scale) for spasticity and mRS (modified Rankin Score) from baseline to follow-up visit at 90 days. Paired T test was used for comparing the outcomes. Results 77% subjects were males, 82% had ischemic stroke, median age was 58.5 years, and median NIHSS score was 11. We observed favorable changes in outcome measures after treatment. mRS < = 2 at 90 days was observed in 85.71% of patients with acute stroke, 64.51% of subacute and 55.88% of chronic strokes (p value < 0.002). Acute stroke had higher rates of limb power improvement (94.28%) than subacute (70.96%) or chronic strokes (41.17%) (p value = < 0.01). Post-stroke spasticity reduction was also observed after rTMS. Patients with infarcts or hemorrhages had no significant differences. No significant adverse events were seen. Conclusion rTMS appears to be safe in our study population and could be effectively delivered at different time points to augment post-stroke motor recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of the Correlation of Pulsatility Index by Transcranial Doppler in the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Cerebral Venous Sinus 
Thrombosis Acute Ischaemic Stroke in a Young Adult in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Report of Post-strangulation Carotid Artery Dissection The Effect of Biological Sex on a County Pre-hospital Stroke Initiative COVID and Vaccine-related Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Expert Consensus on Improving Stroke Care Ecosystem in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1